Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can men be feminists?

224 replies

Vivacia · 03/12/2014 21:56

Inspired by another thread!

I've just read the claim that men can never really be feminists. I disagree. Would be fascinated, and grateful, to read others' thoughts on this.

OP posts:
BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 09/12/2014 20:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

YonicSleighdriver · 09/12/2014 20:13
Trills · 09/12/2014 20:20

I consider "feminism" to be a set of beliefs.

People should be treated and valued equally, and given equal opportunities, regardless of their sex or gender. Currently this is not the case.

Men are able to hold those beliefs.

Therefore men can be feminists.

DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 09/12/2014 20:22

I'd suspect though Trills that the actual bar is much higher than what one believes.

Trills · 09/12/2014 20:37

Who precisely decide what the actual bar is?

PuffinsAreFictitious · 09/12/2014 20:46

Can I objectify Brent Spiner?

He nearly married the Queen of the Borg.

My dogs like him too.

BreakingDad77 · 09/12/2014 21:05

To me feminism is many pathed route to equality and don't see what the fear is?

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 09/12/2014 21:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DoctorTwo · 09/12/2014 21:35

Men are able to hold those beliefs.

Therefore men can be feminists.

My daughters tell me this Trills, I tell them that I haven't their 'lived experience' so prefer to be referred to as an ally. I'm slightly wary of men who claim to be feminists, for some reason. Confused

SconeRhymesWithGone · 09/12/2014 21:45

To complicate matters more, if a woman who is a feminist tells a man she thinks he's a feminist, but he says no I'm not, I am an ally, well, that can seem to be a bit of mansplaining perhaps. Maybe suggesting that she doesn't really understand feminism but he does?

UptoapointLordCopper · 09/12/2014 21:49
Confused Grin
DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 09/12/2014 21:58

oh I can easily solve that conundrum Scone. She's wrong.

There.Smile

Trills · 09/12/2014 22:17

Different women have different lives and different experiences.

Which particular experiences are required? How can you be sure that all women have them?

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 09/12/2014 22:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MN164 · 10/12/2014 14:45

To be a feminist do you need to be both:

  1. oppressed (i.e. a woman); and
  2. believe in and promote equality?

If so, you cannot be a male feminist as you cannot claim oppression (although this could be debated). You might also be excluded if you are a woman that claims never to have suffered gender based oppression.

However if being oppressed is not necessary to the membership of "feminists" then you can be a male feminist by the act of believing and supporting the political movement, just like a wealthy privileged Lord can be a socialist.

Who gets to define the rules for membership of feminism anyway?
Pretty sure it's no single person and especially not me. Smile

DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 10/12/2014 18:02

Rules for eligibility to be a 'feminist' - gets kicked around a bit on these boards over time. i.e. some women accused of not being a 'proper feminist' or 'not feminist enough', though that's fairly rare.

'Imagine and empathise' goes some way for men, ime, but recognising that men actually have a "mandate to intervene" (and a requirement imho) to make a difference and following that through re womens rights is the next quite important bit of the Lego structure.

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 10/12/2014 18:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 10/12/2014 18:15

yes I see that Buffy - I'd replace with 'responsibility' I'd guess, though I didn't mean for it to carry the officialdom that comes with it.

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 10/12/2014 18:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 10/12/2014 18:43

Well with respect, really, I didn't 'weigh in' at all, or tell you how to 'do it better'. And I don't need to do the things you ask by way of social media - it's all around me in RL, in gritty reality. That;s where it actually happens, not by proxy on a web-site where you seem to live - so forgive me for pointing that out to you?

You seem to uncomfortable with men taking any responsibility - but essentially 'we' don't require your particular 'blessing' or even agreement - it's regarding men taking responsibility to 'be that better part of themselves', not being abusive, enjoying a 'privilege' at the cost to others, and recognising their powerful role in making a better world. It's the "hard-to-reach" boys and men that involves me, not the easy, liberally-minded ones.

No, not pissed off at all, though thanks for the invitation to feel that way.

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 10/12/2014 19:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 10/12/2014 19:16

erm..it's pretty clear I'm not a 'feminist man' - surely that's been obv.Smile

I'd indicated it's a male responsibility for a few things - some shared, some not so with a feminist interpretation. Not sure where the insulting thing comes in, but that could go on endlessly, with a 'touche' aspect that is too boring to go into, personally. Touchy male ego? Okay. ditto.

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 10/12/2014 19:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffyWithChristmasEarings · 10/12/2014 19:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DeePancrisPandevenistaken · 10/12/2014 19:26

PA digs? Hmm Really, Buffy?

And I don't believe for a nano-second you've hidden this. fwiw.