I think that we have to be careful when calling someone a 'rape apologist', and instead think about the way in which we have been conditioned by society and the press to think that women could prevent rape.
Almost every article about a rape includes some mention of what the woman did 'wrong'. Short skirt, dark alley, too much alcohol.
And I do see what Eclectic is getting at.
If we say around 85% of women knew the person who raped them then that leaves 15% of rapes by strangers (not sure if these are the exact figures, but I think it is something like this)
So what I think Eclectic means (and do correct me if I am wrong) is: should we be looking at these 15% of rapes and considering ways in which they could be avoided.
The problem with this is that not all of these 15% of rapes were at night/when the woman had been drinking/wearing a short skirt. And even if they were, millions of women go out at night, have a drink and/or wear a short skirt.
Can we (should we) really tell millions of women to cover up, stay home and not get drunk because of the tiny 'risk' that they could get raped?
We might as well all just go and live in Saudi Arabia. Oh. But wait. Women get raped there too.
Damn. Flaw in your plan, Eclectic. Back to the drawing board.