,ø?º°°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°°º?ø,¸¸,ø?º°°º?ø,¸
Just finished book, very impressed at some of the theories on this thread, think Regulus Black and locket sounds very plausible.
Snape definitely bad, I'm sorry, he just HAS to be, can't think of any way he can redeem himself having revealed being responsible for telling Voldemort the prophecy and hence indirectly for James and Lily Potter being killed by Voldy. And then actually killing Dumbledore. Bit of an anticlimax after the whole Dumbledore trusting him for some secret and enigmatic reason. He's always been boo-hiss pantomimic bad and felt that revelation that he was genuinely evil and double-agent was most rounded and convincing thing she did with his character.
Found the episode when Dumbledore and Harry go after what turns out to be the fake horcrux strangely disengaging - just Dumbledore waving his arms and muttering and Harry mostly had passive role, apart from force-drinking Dumbledore the potion. What hope does this give us that JK can get him to convincingly figure out all the others and destroy them on his own?
Don't think Harry can be a horcrux, but wouldn't surprise me if he does end up dead at the end of the next book - would make sense of the fact that she is totally adamant that she will never write about him again.
And with Dumbledore gone, JK has left large gap at centre of the series. The character provided a focal point and while he was doing lots of leg work in the background gave a realistic chance that Voldemort might eventually be defeated.
Thought this was definitely better than the last one, although felt that plot didn't really pick up pace until p175 or thereabouts.