Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why is the Coronation going to cost £100 million?

184 replies

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 09:38

I do not understand how a ceremony in a cathedral is going to cost this much. We know how much roughly security cost for past Royal weddings so this is not the answer. The estimated cost for William and Kate's wedding with a big reception and evening do was £30 million, includi9ng security. How does a ceremony in a cathedral plus security cost £70 million more than a wedding?

title amended by MNHQ at OP's request.

OP posts:
HereComesMaleficent · 24/01/2023 12:44

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 12:31

He really is trying, but to anti-monarchists nothing will ever be good enough. They are in La la land thinking no monarchy= more money for regular people and it simply is not possible.

Indeed the money would just get converted to fund a president and their housing/security/team.

Many of the houses and estates would be sold off to private people and organisations, and any profit will just sit in the government coffers for them to do silly things with.

Exchanging Monarchs for presidents doesn't equate more money for the plebs. Never has, never will.

Mamamia7962 · 24/01/2023 12:50

Can't believe that people are outraged over voluntary litter pickers. You should be more outraged that people think it's ok to drop litter in the first place.

Sweetmotherofallthatisholyabov · 24/01/2023 12:50

Well apparently Patrick's day (in Ireland) generates 72 million to our economy and that's an absolute disaster zone so I assume the coronation, which isn't a completely disgusting drunken affair that happens once a year, I will generate a load more. And there's Crown Jewels etc at the coronation and a lot more symbolism at a coronation so I'd imagine a much bigger target requiring more security.

LauraNicolaides · 24/01/2023 12:51

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 10:22

@Onnabugeisha Sorry you are right. But they also sell tickets which raise about $70 million.

I have asked MN to change the title
£100 million is still outrageous.

I have asked MN to change the title
£100 million is still outrageous.

Well at a stroke the figure has reduced by 90%! Maybe what you're complaining about is not really the cost.

IcedPurple · 24/01/2023 12:55

fantasmasgoria1 · 24/01/2023 12:09

They should use that money to help people in need not have a coronation.

Do you really think that if the cost were reduced, or even if the Coronation were cancelled outright, that the money saved would go to 'help people in need'?

Because that's not really how it works.

thankyouforthesun · 24/01/2023 13:13

America12 · 24/01/2023 09:51

Disgraceful when people are freezing and starving.

Some of it will go on police overtime, army overtime, that's cool, they can spend that money in their local communities, local soft play, pubs, cafes and things. There's an army base near us so I hope some of our soldiers get sent down to get the benefits.

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:19

Mamamia7962 · 24/01/2023 12:50

Can't believe that people are outraged over voluntary litter pickers. You should be more outraged that people think it's ok to drop litter in the first place.

They are outraged that £100 million has been spent but that people are expected to volunteer to litter pick. I do find that shocking.

OP posts:
00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:21

It's so bizarre how people like OP are all "waahh, but what about the hungry, the poor, the whatever"

But fail to realise it's her friends, family, colleagues, those poorer people etc that are being paid to work the event, being paid to cater, organise, staff, publicise etc keeping people in work, keeping the economy going, helping people pay their bills etc

It's not as if the coronation is going to consist of a bonfire if £100m in £5 notes and we all get to watch it burn....

HereComesMaleficent · 24/01/2023 13:23

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:19

They are outraged that £100 million has been spent but that people are expected to volunteer to litter pick. I do find that shocking.

Pay them then, and you can add that to the bill 🤷🏻‍♀️ I'm sure nobody will complain about the price associated to "cleaning up" because some members of society are unable to use a bin...the bad people in this equation are those littering not the staff cleaning up or the monarchy.

00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:23

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:19

They are outraged that £100 million has been spent but that people are expected to volunteer to litter pick. I do find that shocking.

No one is expected to do anything.

But if they paid people to litter pick, it would surely add to the expense you're so outraged about...

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:24

@00100001 Why so much more than the Queen's Coronation or William and Kates wedding?
It is way more expensive than either of those. Charles has went for the luxury version.

OP posts:
Planta · 24/01/2023 13:25

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:19

They are outraged that £100 million has been spent but that people are expected to volunteer to litter pick. I do find that shocking.

So you want MORE money spent on it for people to be paid? Or do you think soldiers or police offers should be doing it?

IcedPurple · 24/01/2023 13:29

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:24

@00100001 Why so much more than the Queen's Coronation or William and Kates wedding?
It is way more expensive than either of those. Charles has went for the luxury version.

I'm not sure you can compare costs from the 1950s to hypothetical costs in the present day. And a Coronation of a monarch is a lot more important than the wedding of the man who was then only the son of the Prince of Wales.

The way you are talking, Charles met with party planners and said "OK I'll have your super deluxe Coronation package. No costs spared." It doesn't work like that. It's a state event and while Charles will obviously have input, he doesn't rule by decree and won't have the final say. It's not the Middle Ages.

00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:31

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:24

@00100001 Why so much more than the Queen's Coronation or William and Kates wedding?
It is way more expensive than either of those. Charles has went for the luxury version.

A coronation is more "important" than a wedding if the (then) third in line.

Charles has actually cut back the ceremony...so I'm not sure where you're getting the idea it's the "luxury" version...
and you're still labouring/banging on about the "£100m" figure, which is a number plucked out of thin air....

Move on. Build a bridge, and get over it.

00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:32

*second in line

Aaron95 · 24/01/2023 13:34

£100 million seems like a lot of money but look at it as an investment.

The UK does pomp and ceremony better than any other country in the world. People come to the UK as tourists precicely for that reason. They have a fasination with the pomp, uniforms, the military parades, the history and yes the royals themselves.

This will be the biggest, most elaborate event we have held for 70 years. It will have representatives from practically every country in the world. It will be watched on TV by people around the world and I am willing to bet that as a direct result tourists will come to the UK and spend an awful lot more than £100 million when they do.

MarshaMelrose · 24/01/2023 13:35

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:19

They are outraged that £100 million has been spent but that people are expected to volunteer to litter pick. I do find that shocking.

I pay council tax. We still do voluntary litter picking in local beauty spits...because people are pigs and don't take their rubbish home.
No outrage round here. Its purely voluntary.

MarshaMelrose · 24/01/2023 13:36

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 13:24

@00100001 Why so much more than the Queen's Coronation or William and Kates wedding?
It is way more expensive than either of those. Charles has went for the luxury version.

Can I ask, are you American?

IcedPurple · 24/01/2023 13:37

MarshaMelrose · 24/01/2023 13:36

Can I ask, are you American?

From Antelope Valley perhaps?

On the other hand, she could be a Girl from Bradford.

MargaritaRita · 24/01/2023 13:48

The optics are just all wrong I think. No need for all the pageantry, but that's for the peasants. If they didn't have a coronation there would be no publicity and what are they there for if not to self perpetuate by showing off their diamonds, ermine, crowns and Cinderella coaches. Nothing of any great value really.

I have no problem with a coronation ceremony/celebration, it has to be done to show they mean something, but what do they mean anyway?

I would advocate a hefty pay per view charge, a congestion type charge for arriving in London to witness it, make it self funded, then those who want to watch it can pay for the privilege of seeing their overlords wave from the balcony. What a feeling!

And as for the £1.50 allegedly paid by each of us, remember the cost is shared out ONLY amongst taxpayers, not by dividing the entire population by the overall cost. That is one hell of fake news.

00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:58

It is so funded. The Grant paid for it and selling the TV rights etc will more than pay for it

00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:59

MargaritaRita · 24/01/2023 13:48

The optics are just all wrong I think. No need for all the pageantry, but that's for the peasants. If they didn't have a coronation there would be no publicity and what are they there for if not to self perpetuate by showing off their diamonds, ermine, crowns and Cinderella coaches. Nothing of any great value really.

I have no problem with a coronation ceremony/celebration, it has to be done to show they mean something, but what do they mean anyway?

I would advocate a hefty pay per view charge, a congestion type charge for arriving in London to witness it, make it self funded, then those who want to watch it can pay for the privilege of seeing their overlords wave from the balcony. What a feeling!

And as for the £1.50 allegedly paid by each of us, remember the cost is shared out ONLY amongst taxpayers, not by dividing the entire population by the overall cost. That is one hell of fake news.

Where's the money going to come from to administer the congestion charge for this event?

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 13:59

00100001 · 24/01/2023 13:21

It's so bizarre how people like OP are all "waahh, but what about the hungry, the poor, the whatever"

But fail to realise it's her friends, family, colleagues, those poorer people etc that are being paid to work the event, being paid to cater, organise, staff, publicise etc keeping people in work, keeping the economy going, helping people pay their bills etc

It's not as if the coronation is going to consist of a bonfire if £100m in £5 notes and we all get to watch it burn....

Not to mention part of the cost is the Bank Holiday pay everyone gets….we all get a free full days wages just to celebrate. We aren’t paying for the Coronation, we are being paid to party! 🎉🥳

MarshaMelrose · 24/01/2023 14:23

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 13:59

Not to mention part of the cost is the Bank Holiday pay everyone gets….we all get a free full days wages just to celebrate. We aren’t paying for the Coronation, we are being paid to party! 🎉🥳

I agree. Let's parteeeee. Only on MN do people complain about getting a bank holiday because of what it costs the economy. And only when it concerns royalty. I don't see the same people railing over getting Christmas and New Year off. Strange that.

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 14:27

MarshaMelrose · 24/01/2023 14:23

I agree. Let's parteeeee. Only on MN do people complain about getting a bank holiday because of what it costs the economy. And only when it concerns royalty. I don't see the same people railing over getting Christmas and New Year off. Strange that.

Or the Bank Holidays in May and August when the weather is usually nice and you have a BBQ or long weekend away….