Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why is the Coronation going to cost £100 million?

184 replies

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 09:38

I do not understand how a ceremony in a cathedral is going to cost this much. We know how much roughly security cost for past Royal weddings so this is not the answer. The estimated cost for William and Kate's wedding with a big reception and evening do was £30 million, includi9ng security. How does a ceremony in a cathedral plus security cost £70 million more than a wedding?

title amended by MNHQ at OP's request.

OP posts:
AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 10:46

The Queen's Coronation cost in equivalent money today (taking into account inflation) £46 million.
metro.co.uk/2022/10/11/how-much-did-the-queens-coronation-cost-2-17545178/

Why should Charles have a Coronation that costs at least £54 million than the Queen?
No one is suggesting he has a ceremony in his dining room, just that he reigns in the costs. £100 million is ridiculous and way more than the £30 million cost of William and Kate's wedding,

OP posts:
00100001 · 24/01/2023 10:47

And some tourists might even spend an extended time in UK and visit other parts of the UK and spend their money there as well... LETS CANCEL THE CORONATION IT WILL DO US NO GOOD AT ALL.

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 10:47

paintitallover · 24/01/2023 10:37

Ffs. Let them eat cake attitude rules.

How can such expense be justified? It's disgusting when some children don't eat enough.

MP annual expenses are on average £140m per year every year. These are the extra “expenses” they get reimbursed for- food, refreshments, transportation, utility bills of their second London residences, extra staff/assistants, etc.

Bit odd that we’d begrudge having the first royal Coronation in 70yrs…when it will cost much much less.

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 10:49

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 10:46

The Queen's Coronation cost in equivalent money today (taking into account inflation) £46 million.
metro.co.uk/2022/10/11/how-much-did-the-queens-coronation-cost-2-17545178/

Why should Charles have a Coronation that costs at least £54 million than the Queen?
No one is suggesting he has a ceremony in his dining room, just that he reigns in the costs. £100 million is ridiculous and way more than the £30 million cost of William and Kate's wedding,

You have posted links to a lot of things but not one link or shred of evidence behind this £100m number…so, please post where you got this figure from.

00100001 · 24/01/2023 10:49

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 10:46

The Queen's Coronation cost in equivalent money today (taking into account inflation) £46 million.
metro.co.uk/2022/10/11/how-much-did-the-queens-coronation-cost-2-17545178/

Why should Charles have a Coronation that costs at least £54 million than the Queen?
No one is suggesting he has a ceremony in his dining room, just that he reigns in the costs. £100 million is ridiculous and way more than the £30 million cost of William and Kate's wedding,

Are you actually going to post the link of where you found the £100m figure ?

BlackBasket · 24/01/2023 10:52

Meh. Calm down Cromwell.

Is ‘the coronation could pay for the NHS instead’ the new ‘Brexit bus’?

ladyforallseasons · 24/01/2023 10:53

emmylousings · 24/01/2023 10:42

Crazy. Bunch of benefit scroungers, don't even pay income tax.

The Royal Family DO pay income tax....educate yourself please.

The monarch doesn't have to but the Queen did and so does Charles.

The rest of the Royal Family pay tax as normal too.

The Duke of Edinburgh paid death duties too

OP posts:
DancingLeaves · 24/01/2023 10:53

I understand that there will be light shows, rock bands playing, buildings lit up with light projections etc. I believe all this will last 3 days...

ForTheLoveOfSleep · 24/01/2023 10:54

🤦‍♀️

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 10:59

Huh,
your yahoo link says the estimate isn’t from the Golden Orb committee itself but an unnamed source close to it:
”source linked to the Operation Golden Orb committee, which plans the ceremony, told the Sun that costs could run to more than £100 million.”
uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/patronising-backlash-king-brings-cost-114112781.html

but both your Sun links report that the extra costs were due to security, not “flattering vanity” or Charles III going big:
“A source said: “In today’s money the 1953 coronation cost around £50million but estimates for King Charles’s are twice that because of things like security, which weren’t such a big issue back then. But worldwide TV rights will more than cover the cost and it will be a massive boost to tourism. Hotels are already being booked out for the coronation weekend.”
www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/20101415/king-charles-coronation-questions-answered/

Also that the cost will be zero to taxpayers due to the worldwide TV rights more than offsetting it….

ForTheLoveOfSleep · 24/01/2023 11:00

The Yahoo one is quoting the Sun so pointless.

The Sun article is from last October. Anything more recent?

Although it actually says within it “But worldwide TV rights will more than cover the cost and it will be a massive boost to tourism. Hotels are already being booked out for the coronation weekend.”

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 11:03

This one is more recent, but the £100m is the reporter’s personal estimate
uk.news.yahoo.com/king-charles-coronation-plans-cost-of-living-crisis-hypocritical-154542678.html

”When Queen Elizabeth II was crowned in 1953, it cost the nation £1.57m — today’s equivalent of £51m ($61m). For Charles, using the cost of security at events such as previous royal weddings as a benchmark, I calculate the figure could be inching closer to £100m ($120m) when factoring in the sophisticated operation it will require.

Despite the estimated increased cost, Charles’ ceremony will be shorter and last between one and two hours (as opposed to his mother’s three-hour event) with rituals considered outdated or cumbersome cut to allow for the reduced run time. There are also expected to be far fewer attendees at the 2023 coronation: 2,000 compared to 8,000 at the late Queen’s.”

by Omid Scobie (and he’s personally estimating £100m)

00100001 · 24/01/2023 11:03

LOL.

One quotes another which says " a source linked to Golden Orb".

So unless you have an actual reliable source....?

SO224350 · 24/01/2023 11:05

America12 · 24/01/2023 09:51

Disgraceful when people are freezing and starving.

Didn't take long for that line to be trotted out 🙄

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 11:09

Even if it were £100m to do the Coronation, that is still a budget event compared to the £162m the Americans spend every 4yrs to inaugurate a President. 🤷‍♀️

And if we didn’t have a monarch, but a President as a head of State, sort of shows even if as a republic we went all frugal, we’d be spending this £100m/Yr every few years instead of after 70yrs this time, and perhaps a good 20yrs until the next coronation.

Sort of squashes the anti-royalist arguments that monarchies are more expensive than republics in terms of ceremonies for heads of state.

MarshaBradyo · 24/01/2023 11:11

ForTheLoveOfSleep · 24/01/2023 10:45

Any links to sources for this? If I google it, it just sends me to Daily Fail type sites. And I'm loathe to believe any site that has a link to a story about Katie Price's teeth next to it.

😂

00100001 · 24/01/2023 11:12

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 10:07

Taxpayers are paying for the Coronation.
Does the monies from the TV rights to film the Coronation go to the Royal Family or the government?
And will TV rights really bring in at least £100 million? It is not as if filming will be sold off to the highest bidder. It will go to the BBC and they will not be paying anything like this amount. £100 million is more than Sky paid for TV rights to 4 World Cups in football.

Nearly every country in the world will have at least one TV station that want to show it, or parts of it.... They'll buy it.... even if it's off the BBC.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 24/01/2023 11:13

It's estimated that every extra bank holiday costs the UK economy over £2 billion and obviously that's before the cost of the coronation itself and the major disruption it will cause for several days before and after which will also have a huge negative impact. So your thread title can be changed back OP 😉

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 11:14

Do the monies from TV rights go to the government or the Royal Family?

OP posts:
00100001 · 24/01/2023 11:14

SO224350 · 24/01/2023 11:05

Didn't take long for that line to be trotted out 🙄

There's starving children in Africa, and there you are stuffing your face with a Greggs baked bean bake.....

Tsk tsk

00100001 · 24/01/2023 11:14

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 11:14

Do the monies from TV rights go to the government or the Royal Family?

It won't go to the royal family....

BlackBasket · 24/01/2023 11:15

Onnabugeisha · 24/01/2023 11:09

Even if it were £100m to do the Coronation, that is still a budget event compared to the £162m the Americans spend every 4yrs to inaugurate a President. 🤷‍♀️

And if we didn’t have a monarch, but a President as a head of State, sort of shows even if as a republic we went all frugal, we’d be spending this £100m/Yr every few years instead of after 70yrs this time, and perhaps a good 20yrs until the next coronation.

Sort of squashes the anti-royalist arguments that monarchies are more expensive than republics in terms of ceremonies for heads of state.

I can’t see why republicans are complaining, if they had their way we’d be spending this every 4 years?

seeing as the last one was seventy years ago, every 4 years has so far cost us about £1.4m at the very top of the estimate. Bargain if you ask me

AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 11:16

@Onnabugeisha In the US they sell tickets to reduce the cost of the Presidential inauguration.
And even then it is clearly too much. Just because one country spends too much it does not mean we have to as well.

OP posts:
AttentionAll · 24/01/2023 11:17

We are an independent nation. We do not have to do what the US do.
If Charles had a Coronation like the Queen it would cost "only" £46 million.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread