Ham pr disasters 54! ….the relentless reconciliation edition…

[jeffgoldblum]

Apologies for my tardiness! , the last thread finished unexpectedly!!! 😱

She knows how bad it looks that she never said anything for 8 years!!!!

But how could she have said anything? There was an (ongoing?) police investigation and normally the family of the accused would not be keep updated on how that was going. Plus, she would know that if she so much as hinted to the media or her followers that she had her reasons for keeping her distance from her father, the internet and every would-be sleuth in the entire world wouldn't let it rest until they'd found out why.

I'm no fan or apologist for MM (do a MN search on my user handle if you don't believe me), but I don't see how she could've said or done anything.

Thanks @TheTwerkingDuchessOfMonteshitshow I had no idea the health care was so bad there!

It feels like EITHER a massive wind up to get the frothing going, OR as if she's let CEO of the Sussex Squad write the article.
Having said that, I've never read a Sun piece before, so maybe they are all like that. I do know they have to write at <12 reading level though.

I think this whole thing just illustrates how little
strategic thinking goes on with the Sussexes. If this was the real reason why she didn’t see her father, why did she say it was because of the wedding suit photos and then Harry say it was his fault as op have said. If she had this massive secret, why accuse the RF of racism etc. It’s always all just knee jerk reactions and clap backs and it’s now ringing very hollow

He was a Conservative and he presided over one of the most corrupt governments.
Honest? What about the affair with Edwina?

They see themselves at truthsayers, that they are compelled to do what’s right, even in the face of adversity.

Yet on the serious issue of CSA, they cover it up with a story about tabloid collusion?

There’s a difference between not saying anything and obscuring the truth.

I have to go out!!! , with the way things are going, I leave you this!
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/the_royal_family/5592124-ham-pr-disasters-55-no-neither-david-attenborough-or-john-major-will-be-head-of-state?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=app_share

I know. Even by Tory standards, a shyster.

I don't understand how her father's alleged crimes are supposed to affect my opinion of her claiming that the Royal family were racist?

There was an (ongoing?) police investigation and normally the family of the accused would not be keep updated on how that was going.

So why was she told of the allegations in the first place?

And why was Markle allowed to travel around the world if he was the subject of an investigation for very serious crimes?

I agree that it was not Meghan's responsibility to speak about these allegations in public, but the whole story is a bit odd. There has to be a lot more to come out.

Ta muchly!

I googled about how law enforcement in different countries communicate and Interpol used I-24/7, which allows frontline officers and national central bureaus to share criminal data, alerts, and wanted-person notices.

The idea that the FBI wrote a letter and bunged it in the post is risible.

One thing I would say about John Major is that the absurd pantomime that our series of PMs descended into since then does make him seem like an ok calibre in hindsight 😅

Not logical

That’s how I interpreted it. As TM has never been to the UK there wouldn’t be offences here for the Met to investigate.

And here you are. Picking over things with the rest of us.

Welcome.

Sorry... just, no. 🤮

I’m fully aware it isn’t.
Catherine and William were at Frogmore house.

Hmmm. Maybe there was only one copy of the letter and it was given to Meghan, but unfortunately, the dog ate it 🤔

So she said all she could say about the RF instead, because she knew they wouldn’t be able to reply to her or use legal action to address the lies that were told.

She’s a bully. Picks on people who can’t answer back.

Good job that letter didn't get lost in the post.

If William and Harry were budgerigas

x.com/thefigen_/status/2113597196096381202?s=46&t=r558CTZgqkRnEyRy3wUq3g

Conception date for 6th May, assuming going to full term, and we haven't heard anything to suggest that he was early, would be the first week in September. So even assuming an early test wouldn't know for around a fortnight at the earliest.

latest
https://www.dailymail.com/home/index.html