Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 31

615 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 25/08/2026 22:13

Have the eagles landed yet? Another thread to discuss yet more Sussex shenanigans!

PR disasters thread 31
OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
AutumnCrowFlewOverTheCotswoldsNest · Yesterday 08:58

Imagine if M has footage of H pissed out of his tits being angry at the world and various named people - Hollywood moguls, politicians, royals, neighbours in Montecito … She’s always got that ruddy phone out filming away. It’ll be their household ‘normal’ to have phones out and recording.

(Maybe it’s already being sold to the highest bidder for the Kompromat vaults somewhere.)

AtIusvue · Yesterday 09:00

AustenitesUnite · Yesterday 08:55

I keep wondering what M was hinting at when she gave us an exciting glimpse of her picking apples . . . .

Is she going to use her experience of jam-making to branch out into other preserves and produce an As Ever Chutney? Because, honestly, that's what we all need right now. There were only 40 - 50 different chutneys in my garden centre last week . . . .

Or is she going to show us all, step by monotonous step, how to create a Cotswold Ploughman's Plate, artfully arranging hand-cut slices of artisan bread, cheese & apples in an arc and sprinkling them with flower petals, just like the ploughmen of yore did every lunchtime

Perhaps she will produce a new dessert, Sussex Apple Tart, sharp-tasting with an unpleasant aftertaste that lingers for a long time

Or is she hinting at The Big Apple and she's going to take New York by storm although I think the Sussex's upset a few people there a while back with a story about a car chase

It’s an apple butter she’s releasing to go with the jams

Ratherhaveacupofteaandabiscuit · Yesterday 09:01

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · Yesterday 08:41

She let go of every other relationship she’s ever had.

Exactly.

There is no evidence she can maintain relationships or values them.

She can certainly act as if she does when it suits her but even that never rings true.

I have said before that I believe she is an empty person who will never be happy because she cannot love.

Her children are of use as props but if they become troublesome she will find a way to cast them off whilst still protecting her image.

She values attention and adoration but love means nothing to her.

She will never put someone else before herself, and that includes her children.

There is something very wrong with this woman and she will harm everyone who gets close to her throughout her life.

Her looks and ability to mimic enable her to do so.

If she looked like the back of a number 9 she would be on her own and living a very isolated life.

AtIusvue · Yesterday 09:02

How long was it until Meg posted her ring back to her first husband because they couldn’t make the long distance marriage work?

That was a three hour time difference ….this is an 8 hour time difference with the Atlantic between.

FenellaFeldman · Yesterday 09:03

I think she'll remember the Albert Hall episode. Remember when she was pregnant and suffering from serious depression, and instead of getting her help, he made her dress up and go to an event at the Albert Hall?
When I first heard them talk about that, I thought....that will come back to bite him.

AutumnCrowFlewOverTheCotswoldsNest · Yesterday 09:05

AustenitesUnite · Yesterday 08:55

I keep wondering what M was hinting at when she gave us an exciting glimpse of her picking apples . . . .

Is she going to use her experience of jam-making to branch out into other preserves and produce an As Ever Chutney? Because, honestly, that's what we all need right now. There were only 40 - 50 different chutneys in my garden centre last week . . . .

Or is she going to show us all, step by monotonous step, how to create a Cotswold Ploughman's Plate, artfully arranging hand-cut slices of artisan bread, cheese & apples in an arc and sprinkling them with flower petals, just like the ploughmen of yore did every lunchtime

Perhaps she will produce a new dessert, Sussex Apple Tart, sharp-tasting with an unpleasant aftertaste that lingers for a long time

Or is she hinting at The Big Apple and she's going to take New York by storm although I think the Sussex's upset a few people there a while back with a story about a car chase

Maybe she’s telling someone, ‘how do you like them apples?’ And, as ever, it has failed to land.

It’s not really Taylor Swift and her easter eggs, is it?

CameUnstuckNowTryingSalty · Yesterday 09:20

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 08:20

Which will play into that misogynistic trope that it's all the woman's fault. I would like him to apologise to his family and tell the public he has apologised. Then there may be a way forward for him here.

Completely agree with this.

I think they both bring the worst out in each other- but a lot lies with Harry as they entered his world.

Lockupyourbiscuits · Yesterday 09:22

This separation/distance is tying in nicely to her memoir - it’s going to be a corker in all the wrong ways - last card about to be played

CameUnstuckNowTryingSalty · Yesterday 09:22

Ratherhaveacupofteaandabiscuit · Yesterday 09:01

Exactly.

There is no evidence she can maintain relationships or values them.

She can certainly act as if she does when it suits her but even that never rings true.

I have said before that I believe she is an empty person who will never be happy because she cannot love.

Her children are of use as props but if they become troublesome she will find a way to cast them off whilst still protecting her image.

She values attention and adoration but love means nothing to her.

She will never put someone else before herself, and that includes her children.

There is something very wrong with this woman and she will harm everyone who gets close to her throughout her life.

Her looks and ability to mimic enable her to do so.

If she looked like the back of a number 9 she would be on her own and living a very isolated life.

Very like Diana, turns out from the last thread that Diana was very aware how bald children were a good PR stunt.

She didn't put her children first, they boarded and then she spent the summers with boyfriends.

Pedant61 · Yesterday 09:23

Beesandhoney123 · 25/08/2026 23:23

If its true and it is the start of the uncoupling, H must be thrilled to leave that great big white elephant to M and never have to go there again. Who has a 15 year plan for their marriage which begins with lets live a world apart for 15 years and ill pop back every now and then. Sure you will:) dont wait in or up.

If he is here on his own he will be fine. The dc will be fine too, hopefully with a decent nanny / house keeper because for all the talk about dc needing both parents, if one or both parent isn't a natural parent ( polite term) and is more concerned openly with thenselves, they are better off without them. School will bring stability and friends.

Being told not to look at cameras - presumably- whilst your mum is posing and simpering herself at the camera at every opportunity must be so confusing to a child.

So, is Markus coming over?

I agree, but the irony is that Harry has talked about not wanting to recreate the "generational pain" of his father and, to an extent, himself being brought up by nannies....and yet that seems to be what is proposed for Harry's kids!
I accept that with QEII, the times were very different and she suddenly had to take on a massive job, but still.... Harry's hypocrisy is breathtaking.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 09:24

AutumnCrowFlewOverTheCotswoldsNest · Yesterday 08:58

Imagine if M has footage of H pissed out of his tits being angry at the world and various named people - Hollywood moguls, politicians, royals, neighbours in Montecito … She’s always got that ruddy phone out filming away. It’ll be their household ‘normal’ to have phones out and recording.

(Maybe it’s already being sold to the highest bidder for the Kompromat vaults somewhere.)

She probably has, AutumnCrow - also images of him completely stoned so she can claim he's not fit to have custody of the kids

If it comes to divorce he can hardly refuse to let them visit her, and sorry but I still stand by my view that she could simply refuse to send them back

And thanks once again for the new thread, @BigWillyLittleTodger - I'm on a ship at the moment so dipping in when I can

LaMarschallin · Yesterday 09:25

@CameUnstuckNowTryingSalty

Loving your new name! ❤️
I'm so proud 😃

FenellaFeldman · Yesterday 09:26

Pedant61 · Yesterday 09:23

I agree, but the irony is that Harry has talked about not wanting to recreate the "generational pain" of his father and, to an extent, himself being brought up by nannies....and yet that seems to be what is proposed for Harry's kids!
I accept that with QEII, the times were very different and she suddenly had to take on a massive job, but still.... Harry's hypocrisy is breathtaking.

Yet his brother has managed to create a healthy and happy family life. Irony.

smilesy · Yesterday 09:31

FenellaFeldman · Yesterday 09:03

I think she'll remember the Albert Hall episode. Remember when she was pregnant and suffering from serious depression, and instead of getting her help, he made her dress up and go to an event at the Albert Hall?
When I first heard them talk about that, I thought....that will come back to bite him.

Hmmm. I don’t think anyone can make Meghan do
anything she doesn’t want to. Didn’t they spin this that it was Harry’s sense of duty and having to toe the line as a royal that meant that they absolutely had to go to the Albert Hall? What happened to that when they decided to go and schmooze with the Disney boss instead of attending a memorial service for the Marines killed in a bomb blast? And why does it seem that no help was ever sought for Meghan? She seems to have recovered well, considering. I appreciate that I am being cynical but she does have form for playing the victim. And for cos playing Diana who apparently threw herself down the stairs when pregnant with William

FenellaFeldman · Yesterday 09:32

smilesy · Yesterday 09:31

Hmmm. I don’t think anyone can make Meghan do
anything she doesn’t want to. Didn’t they spin this that it was Harry’s sense of duty and having to toe the line as a royal that meant that they absolutely had to go to the Albert Hall? What happened to that when they decided to go and schmooze with the Disney boss instead of attending a memorial service for the Marines killed in a bomb blast? And why does it seem that no help was ever sought for Meghan? She seems to have recovered well, considering. I appreciate that I am being cynical but she does have form for playing the victim. And for cos playing Diana who apparently threw herself down the stairs when pregnant with William

You misunderstand... I'm saying that's how she'll spin it.

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 09:34

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 08:11

It already is on Celebitchy!

Also, William is behind H’s ‘resignation’ from African Parks - he wants the job.

The SS are deeply fearful for M. Catherine is bound to launch another racist attack and there’s also the danger that William, who secretly lusts after the sweet, fragile Meghan, might try something on while H is elsewhere.

It would be funny…except it’s terrifying that these people walk among us!

The small amounts I read about Celebbitchy remind me very much of the Q postings on twitter. Someone who is claiming information they simply don't have yet people believe them and spread the lies far and wide. The snippets I've read on Reddit are very strange.

smilesy · Yesterday 09:38

FenellaFeldman · Yesterday 09:32

You misunderstand... I'm saying that's how she'll spin it.

Ah ok. Yes of course she will 😆

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 09:39

And for cos playing Diana who apparently threw herself down the stairs when pregnant with William

Yes, it's amazing, isn't it, just how much research Meghan can manage to do, or had done, about Diana? Unfortunately she didn't seem to do much about her actual role while in the RF.

How Harry, or anyone, fails to see through the Diana 'shadowing', I just don't know.

KatherineParr · Yesterday 09:40

CameUnstuckNowTryingSalty · Yesterday 09:22

Very like Diana, turns out from the last thread that Diana was very aware how bald children were a good PR stunt.

She didn't put her children first, they boarded and then she spent the summers with boyfriends.

In reality Diana didn't spend a great deal of time with her children and her decisions were not child centred, but can you imagine saying that in the 90s when the narrative was that Diana was an excellent mother?

rocklivia · Yesterday 09:41

Cocolapew · Yesterday 08:50

I can't believe they haven't put out a statement about the magnificent Dolly, she's keeping them off the headlines.
We all know they have to make everything about themselves.

Yet again their news has been eclipsed . Let's compare the two in action - Dolly Parton with her 31 years long Imagination Library inspired by her father who could not read or write and Meg with her swanking up to a school to read to children with her needing nice cushions to do so. 🙄

SheinSussex · Yesterday 09:43

Do you remember Madonna and her children’s books? She did a book reading for the launch in a department store and the children looked [redacted].

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 09:46

MrsLeonFarrell · Yesterday 08:11

Whilst I don't think it is clear what is happening, it is sad if this all ends in divorce. What was the point of it all.

The only thing that will annoy me is if Harry manages to push all responsibility for the last 6 years onto Meghan (which is basically his MO) and behave as if he was completely innocent. I still maintain that he bears the greater responsibility for the way everything turned sour and the attacks on his family and the institution.

It could be even worse than that, MrsLF

If the palace really wanted to risk a rehabilitation of Harry they'd probably try to put all the blame on her themselves ... and as said before they'll have enough ammunition to hand in order to do it

Like so many others it's not that I'm hoping for a divorce, more that, looking at the mess this has become and at Harry's obvious turmoil, it may be for the best in the end

CoffeeCantata · Yesterday 09:51

SheinSussex · Yesterday 09:43

Do you remember Madonna and her children’s books? She did a book reading for the launch in a department store and the children looked [redacted].

Ooh - that would have been scary! She's not really a comforting, child-friendly presence.

AutumnCrowFlewOverTheCotswoldsNest · Yesterday 10:00

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 09:46

It could be even worse than that, MrsLF

If the palace really wanted to risk a rehabilitation of Harry they'd probably try to put all the blame on her themselves ... and as said before they'll have enough ammunition to hand in order to do it

Like so many others it's not that I'm hoping for a divorce, more that, looking at the mess this has become and at Harry's obvious turmoil, it may be for the best in the end

I suppose in terms of the diplomacy analysis and divorce negotiation that the MIGS at the palace do, it’s always better in the long-term if both parties can be (and feel) extricated with as much dignity and calm as possible. I think this is what we’re seeing.

Otherwise it’s a case of assessing your own ammo, waiting for the right moment, pouncing early, and hitting hard and fast. It’ll be ‘shock and awe’ and we’ll know it if we see it. But the risks of escalation are very high, especially regarding an opponent with an unknown amount of weaponry and a volatile disposition.

Both H and M have stuff they’d rather keep hidden, I’ll wager.

MaturingCheeseball · Yesterday 10:01

Am I the only one thinking there is no chance of a divorce? What’s in it for Meghan? No, she’ll be here large as life.