@BasiliskStare @RecoIIectionsMayVary , again, we will have to agree to disagree. I believe it was a reward, coming off the back of an egregious display of utter disdain for our institutions this week (and for the last 6 years) from Harry. And I also believe it was a sign of KC's weakness in conflating his personal issues with his duties as head of state. If it was all on "his terms" and he was playing 4D chess with the Sussexes as pawns in his hand, then giving a meeting to people who have been responsible for the utterly despicable online harassment of his other son, DIL and grandchildren makes me think even less of him. And if the Sussexes were under his control, he wouldn't have to put out any sort of statement. But they are not, so he has had to get the first jab in (he's had to explain), because he can't control the blabbing and leaking that followed every other encounter with the Sussexes, so what makes this one different? And if they blab/leak, it will be back to square one all round, because Charles has never taken any decisive action - the time for final warnings passed many years ago, surely? If he removes them from the website, I'll change my mind, and agree he's a genius.
I don't really understand the argument that Charles has somehow taken the sting out of the security case (I assume that's what you meant @RecoIIectionsMayVary ). It was never Charles's place to prove Harry and family are safe in the UK in the first place, and implying he has done so seems to imply that he has some control over the matter with RAVEC. All Charles has done is welcome them into his perfectly secure home. Nobody serious minded has ever thought they would be under threat on palace/royal property. There was never a sting in the tail to remove, just the delusions of a paranoid egomaniac.
If the media report on their charade next time the only people to blame are the people ua that click the links
I don't agree. It's their job to report it, and nobody else but the perpetrators of the charade are responsible for it. "It's the media's fault, don't read it" argument simply plays into Sussex hands, and their desire for censorship of any negative press against them.