I’m sorry but people can appear to be “classy” when they have wealth and privilege which enables them to live behind what is essentially a blockade where they can employ people to speak, or not, on their behalf.
The RF have a long history of cutting off people whom they judge to be disloyal.
This is problematic when “loyalty” is prized above anything else, even alleged criminality and abuse of vulnerable women for example.
So H & M are placed firmly outside of the circle of wagons and AMW (as we can see from his brief appearance at Sandringham driving trials) is still firmly within it.
Is that classy? Really?
Is paying off an abused woman to the tune of £12 million to avoid going to trial an act of class?
Not appearing to say or do anything overtly, like the late QE2, rather than “classy” can be the equivalent of burying your head in the sand, and on some occasions, can be downright negligent eg covering up AMW’s behaviour.
IMHO, an act of “class” by Charles, if he had any gumption, would be to employ one of the top mediation firms in the country and invite Camilla, William, Catherine, Harry and Meghan, to thrash out their grievances in private and actually talk to one another face to face and genuinely try to gain an understanding of each other’s positions and put an end to this soap opera! It could be easily done if the will was there!
The trouble is I think that having the journalists focus on H&M rather than AMW atm is too useful to them!