Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters Thread 17

1000 replies

Mylovelygreendress · 17/06/2026 17:58

Can’t see a new thread so thought I would start a new one to continue discussing the grifters

OP posts:
Thread gallery
44
TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 11:50

I don't think Harry and his apologists should be able to plead ignorance about his racism 'because of the times back then' or similar excuses, or say his (royal) family just talked like that around him either. Harry was born in 1984, at school in the 1990s and 2000s, and the Race Relations Act ('Section 1: Racial Discrimination') under Wilson/Callaghan received royal assent in 1976. It was well-ingrained and well-known.

The 1980s-1990s in the UK were magical decades for young people of melting pot popular culture, infusing the air with music and our sights with images from film, TV and 2-Tone - the Specials, UB40, the Selecter, the Beat - multiracial bands with an anti-racist ethos. Does anyone else remember 2-Tone's iconic black-and-white checkerboard symbol of racial unity? I mean, this stuff was the bread-and-butter of shows like Top of the Pops and Radio 1 when Harry was growing up and a drunken nuisance life-and-soul of the party.

Everyone knew about racial discrimination then in the UK, and knew that racial insults were wrong. Then came the time of transition from Thatcher-Major to Blair-New Labour, a time of new millennial hopes, Cool Britannia, and - ironically - Diana's funeral and pop-canonisation. Harry had opportunities to visit African nations and other countries, and to meet people from other cultures, experiences of which most teens and young adults could only dream. He was well-educated, with a cultured father and grandmother who knew the law and about social proprieties. He would rather play the drunken, racist thug to punish them for their existence and his not being Number #1 - that was his conscious choice. He grew to enjoy it.

Harry Windsor is now 41, coming up 42. He won't change.

jeffgoldblum · 23/06/2026 11:53

TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 11:50

I don't think Harry and his apologists should be able to plead ignorance about his racism 'because of the times back then' or similar excuses, or say his (royal) family just talked like that around him either. Harry was born in 1984, at school in the 1990s and 2000s, and the Race Relations Act ('Section 1: Racial Discrimination') under Wilson/Callaghan received royal assent in 1976. It was well-ingrained and well-known.

The 1980s-1990s in the UK were magical decades for young people of melting pot popular culture, infusing the air with music and our sights with images from film, TV and 2-Tone - the Specials, UB40, the Selecter, the Beat - multiracial bands with an anti-racist ethos. Does anyone else remember 2-Tone's iconic black-and-white checkerboard symbol of racial unity? I mean, this stuff was the bread-and-butter of shows like Top of the Pops and Radio 1 when Harry was growing up and a drunken nuisance life-and-soul of the party.

Everyone knew about racial discrimination then in the UK, and knew that racial insults were wrong. Then came the time of transition from Thatcher-Major to Blair-New Labour, a time of new millennial hopes, Cool Britannia, and - ironically - Diana's funeral and pop-canonisation. Harry had opportunities to visit African nations and other countries, and to meet people from other cultures, experiences of which most teens and young adults could only dream. He was well-educated, with a cultured father and grandmother who knew the law and about social proprieties. He would rather play the drunken, racist thug to punish them for their existence and his not being Number #1 - that was his conscious choice. He grew to enjoy it.

Harry Windsor is now 41, coming up 42. He won't change.

👏

Well Done Applause GIF by Robert E Blackmon
TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 11:57

binkie163 · 23/06/2026 10:49

Especially in the middle of an expensive law suit Jo Malone London v Zara for their range of Jo loves perfume, clearly trading off the brand name that Jo sold to estee Lauder with a no competition clause.
Considering the cost of her perfumes £125.00+ for really weak product zero silage ( I have a few of her absolutes) it is naughty to be producing same product at a 10th of the price for zara. To be fair JML have fiercer competition with London fragrances who produce 99% perfect copies for £3.75 at that price I got the collection.
Sorry off track! But surprised Zara would want association with scruffy kids.

That's really interesting detail.

It's the sort of comments that a YouTuber like Beebs Kelley might pick up on. (I think she's lurking on here from time to time!)

TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 12:00

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 23/06/2026 11:14

I would almost suspect that Harry's own racism doesn't come from a particular sense of bias based on race, but from his bullying nature.

Bullies, IME, are incredibly aware of hierarchy, and how to exploit it. Race is just one of the things they know affects status and power and that can be exploited. Harry has used it both ways - to exert power over his poor army colleagues and to exert power over his family with racism accusations.

If it weren't race, it would be something else. Wealth, rank, an extra sausage, an employee who's bent over, a disabled matron, the fact that someone once danced with his mum.

In some cases, racism can be less entrenched than a bullying nature. Because Harry would find another reason to reinforce his status or to whine about people.

Absolutely spot on, IMO, and food for thought.

Tiddlywinks63 · 23/06/2026 12:03

abigailll · 22/06/2026 17:24

I expect they won’t be allowed to film anything in or around any royal property - and if KC3 insists on private meeting only - then they are totally scuppered for royal adjacency photo ops - unless they do a collab with Spencer on his estate / Diana island - but that would be a bit tasteless / morose - first reveal of A & L faces is ‘Daily Mail Sad Face’

I hope they’re checked for hidden cameras and microphones. I wouldn’t trust them one bit.

RockaLock · 23/06/2026 12:09

To be fair, A&Ls outfits are not on Meghan’s oneoff page, and I can’t see any links on her instagram post either.

So it doesn’t actually look as though she has used the photo/the kids as a marketing opportunity. At least not as a blatant advert, anyway.

Tiddlywinks63 · 23/06/2026 12:12

KilkennyCats · 23/06/2026 11:29

I don’t know whether shameful or shameless is the appropriate word here 🤷🏻‍♀️
How much lower can they sink?

I guess it’s good she’s showing her true colours now; she doesn’t have any class. It’s increasingly tacky and grubby and smacks of desperation.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 23/06/2026 12:16

TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 11:57

That's really interesting detail.

It's the sort of comments that a YouTuber like Beebs Kelley might pick up on. (I think she's lurking on here from time to time!)

I wonder if According to Taz lurks?!

MyDogClive · 23/06/2026 12:17

Part of me thinks M won’t come and will stay home and sulk. Her bargaining power is limited now and her terms for a visit are unlikely to be agreed to. But then again, will she want to miss out? And does she trust Harry enough to travel without her?

I’m beginning to lean towards her coming & causing trouble.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 23/06/2026 12:44

TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 11:50

I don't think Harry and his apologists should be able to plead ignorance about his racism 'because of the times back then' or similar excuses, or say his (royal) family just talked like that around him either. Harry was born in 1984, at school in the 1990s and 2000s, and the Race Relations Act ('Section 1: Racial Discrimination') under Wilson/Callaghan received royal assent in 1976. It was well-ingrained and well-known.

The 1980s-1990s in the UK were magical decades for young people of melting pot popular culture, infusing the air with music and our sights with images from film, TV and 2-Tone - the Specials, UB40, the Selecter, the Beat - multiracial bands with an anti-racist ethos. Does anyone else remember 2-Tone's iconic black-and-white checkerboard symbol of racial unity? I mean, this stuff was the bread-and-butter of shows like Top of the Pops and Radio 1 when Harry was growing up and a drunken nuisance life-and-soul of the party.

Everyone knew about racial discrimination then in the UK, and knew that racial insults were wrong. Then came the time of transition from Thatcher-Major to Blair-New Labour, a time of new millennial hopes, Cool Britannia, and - ironically - Diana's funeral and pop-canonisation. Harry had opportunities to visit African nations and other countries, and to meet people from other cultures, experiences of which most teens and young adults could only dream. He was well-educated, with a cultured father and grandmother who knew the law and about social proprieties. He would rather play the drunken, racist thug to punish them for their existence and his not being Number #1 - that was his conscious choice. He grew to enjoy it.

Harry Windsor is now 41, coming up 42. He won't change.

I'm not sure I 100% agree with this, the UK isn't a monoculture, and it still isn't.

I grew up in a very rural area in the 90s. Racist and homophobic attitudes were common amongst my friends. I came from a very anti-racist family and was well-educated on it at home, but I can't say that I blame my young and immature friends for not having that background or access to the culture you describe.

I'm proud to say that one of my friends grew up to the point where she was kicked out of a party for tackling racist and homophobic attitudes - which were being expressed by adults who didn't have the excuse of being children.

Britain isn't a racist country, which is not the same as saying there are no racists.

OctopusFriend · 23/06/2026 13:04

The problem is that Meghan knew literally nothing about the UK, certainly not the history of race relations, and how it's very different from the USA.
I remember one of her wild claims in a magazine interview, that a UK newspaper had called her child the N word.
It never happened.

noonames · 23/06/2026 13:05

The racism stuff always confuses me - that the UK is so racist that Meghan felt compelled to escape, but she left for a society that is more racist, and with a racist in tow 🤷‍♀️

OctopusFriend · 23/06/2026 13:15

noonames · 23/06/2026 13:05

The racism stuff always confuses me - that the UK is so racist that Meghan felt compelled to escape, but she left for a society that is more racist, and with a racist in tow 🤷‍♀️

More racist organisations...and racists with guns....

abigailll · 23/06/2026 13:31

noonames · 23/06/2026 13:05

The racism stuff always confuses me - that the UK is so racist that Meghan felt compelled to escape, but she left for a society that is more racist, and with a racist in tow 🤷‍♀️

Me too - she married the most racist (and misogynistic) royal - all repeated incidents of racism documented in the global press for her to see:

In the glorious words of Mrs Merton:

”Tell me, Meghan Markle, what first attracted you to the multi-millionaire racist Prince Harry?”

NCembarassed · 23/06/2026 13:53

I'd like to add to @theautumncrow 's point wrt Harry's family.

I read a biography of HMTLQ a while back which stated at a point where Thatcher's Govt were seeking to sideline/'push down' Commonwealth countries, QE2 stood up for them. It resulted in that policy not being actively pushed. If true (and it was backed up by sources in the book), HMTLQ actively advocated for the Commonwealth countries, to try and ensure they would not be disadvantaged by Govt policy.

I recall friends of mine at that time meeting several MPs at an event, and them being shocked at the racist attitudes when in private, particularly toward S.hemisphere nations. I do hope things have changed.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 23/06/2026 13:56

I remember one of her wild claims in a magazine interview, that a UK newspaper had called her child the N word

I think that was in The Cut, @OctopusFriend. I can't find the original thing, but according to the Independent the quote was this:
“There’s literally a structure by which if you want to release photos of your child, as a member of the family, you first have to give them to the Royal Rota ... Why would I give the very people that are calling my children the N-word a photo of my child before I can share it with the people that love my child?”

I'm not aware of anyone on the royal rota having used the "N word" and don't imagine Meghan is either, but sadly it all fits in with her usual behaviour

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/meghan-markle-prince-harry-archie-photos-b2155008.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwY2xjawSnXw1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFkT3NrcWM5dXJoRGJCVVlRc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHoRMlLRg7r62K5oiZZu7wQ94TBkAWLspjVs6BrlI6L9RdTFSfSB35tYSQ0PE_aem_pGWK-i25DXkG_7NA9CM8_w#Echobox=1661782696

SqueakyDinosaur · 23/06/2026 13:58

There definitely was racist commentary in the public sphere around H&M. Remember Rachel Johnson's comments about M's "exotic DNA"? Or Danny Baker tweeting a pic of a chimp in response to news of Archie's birth? I think it's all too easy to dismiss this stuff in the light of their subsequent appalling behaviour, but it was there and it was deeply offensive.

OctopusFriend · 23/06/2026 14:00

SqueakyDinosaur · 23/06/2026 13:58

There definitely was racist commentary in the public sphere around H&M. Remember Rachel Johnson's comments about M's "exotic DNA"? Or Danny Baker tweeting a pic of a chimp in response to news of Archie's birth? I think it's all too easy to dismiss this stuff in the light of their subsequent appalling behaviour, but it was there and it was deeply offensive.

Of course. No-one has denied that there was no racism. I
However, their accusations against the RF were proven to be untrue.
I'm glad that Danny Baker's tweet was greeted with opprobrium and he lost his job. So it's not as if it was acceptable in the mainstream.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 23/06/2026 14:01

Puzzledandpissedoff · 23/06/2026 13:56

I remember one of her wild claims in a magazine interview, that a UK newspaper had called her child the N word

I think that was in The Cut, @OctopusFriend. I can't find the original thing, but according to the Independent the quote was this:
“There’s literally a structure by which if you want to release photos of your child, as a member of the family, you first have to give them to the Royal Rota ... Why would I give the very people that are calling my children the N-word a photo of my child before I can share it with the people that love my child?”

I'm not aware of anyone on the royal rota having used the "N word" and don't imagine Meghan is either, but sadly it all fits in with her usual behaviour

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/meghan-markle-prince-harry-archie-photos-b2155008.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwY2xjawSnXw1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFkT3NrcWM5dXJoRGJCVVlRc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHoRMlLRg7r62K5oiZZu7wQ94TBkAWLspjVs6BrlI6L9RdTFSfSB35tYSQ0PE_aem_pGWK-i25DXkG_7NA9CM8_w#Echobox=1661782696

See, I do think this could be read differently - that she doesn't want individual reading members of the public (who've used the N word) the pictures via the Royal Rota.

However, I think it's why you have to be very precise and accurate - something she didn't want to be, I imagine. I don't believe that she was told not to send the pics to her mum, for example, just not to send a WhatsApp to all and sundry before the public announcement.

Aprilfountain · 23/06/2026 14:19

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 23/06/2026 14:01

See, I do think this could be read differently - that she doesn't want individual reading members of the public (who've used the N word) the pictures via the Royal Rota.

However, I think it's why you have to be very precise and accurate - something she didn't want to be, I imagine. I don't believe that she was told not to send the pics to her mum, for example, just not to send a WhatsApp to all and sundry before the public announcement.

Yes, when she said this, it was referring to extremists on the internet not respected journalists in the UK and USA. She just used that as an excuse to garner sympathy and get everything her own way!!

Thedom · 23/06/2026 14:39

DM article about how Charles is being disloyal to Catherine by inviting the two grifters to meet with him and stay with him.

This point caught my eye about what Harry wrote about Catherine in Spare, I don’t think I had heard this before, they really went after Catherine, didn’t they !

Or his claims that she was constantly 'on edge' after realising 'she was now going to be compared to and forced to compete with Meghan'?

https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-15922479/AMANDA-PLATELL-galling-Meghan-UK-return-Kate-NEVER-feel-obliged-welcome-back.html

noonames · 23/06/2026 14:46

Thedom · 23/06/2026 14:39

DM article about how Charles is being disloyal to Catherine by inviting the two grifters to meet with him and stay with him.

This point caught my eye about what Harry wrote about Catherine in Spare, I don’t think I had heard this before, they really went after Catherine, didn’t they !

Or his claims that she was constantly 'on edge' after realising 'she was now going to be compared to and forced to compete with Meghan'?

https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-15922479/AMANDA-PLATELL-galling-Meghan-UK-return-Kate-NEVER-feel-obliged-welcome-back.html

Edited

Have they actually confirmed yet that Charles is going to meet them? I think maybe he has said - only if you stfu and stop briefing the press - seeing how quiet it's gone over the last few days.

TheAutumnCrow · 23/06/2026 14:47

SqueakyDinosaur · 23/06/2026 13:58

There definitely was racist commentary in the public sphere around H&M. Remember Rachel Johnson's comments about M's "exotic DNA"? Or Danny Baker tweeting a pic of a chimp in response to news of Archie's birth? I think it's all too easy to dismiss this stuff in the light of their subsequent appalling behaviour, but it was there and it was deeply offensive.

Yeah, and people knew that it was wrong and that's why they got into trouble for it.

Thedom · 23/06/2026 14:50

As far as I can see, the media believe it is happening, but that could be the Sussex global PR team pushing that as a wishful agenda.

NormalAuntFanny · 23/06/2026 15:06

Archive of the mail platell piece.

https://archive.ph/nXSk2

She's certainly the kind of commentator who blows with the wind and the Mail has featured sugars and sinners heavily this week so presumably it's all just so much cock for clicks and they know no more than us what's happening.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread