Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Footage of Charlotte

469 replies

Aspecialkindofhell · 02/05/2026 17:14

Does anyone else feel really uncomfortable about the photos the RF have put out of Charlotte today? Likewise the photo of them all lying in the sand. I feel those photos should be personal . She’s only 11, on holiday and those moments should be private.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
IckyIck · 03/05/2026 17:43

Lunde · 03/05/2026 17:42

2nd - Charles was first in line as the heir
Anne was 2nd in Line as the spare until AMW was born

Harry on the other hand maxed out at 3rd

Princess Elizabeth was first in line to the throne.

noonames · 03/05/2026 17:44

She was 3rd in line when she was born - Charles was 2nd and their mother the heir. Then they all moved up one in 1952.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:44

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:42

@Pippilongstocking2 - genuine question, why do you think Anne isn't in the line of succession?

Because someone said recently she was not on another post and people agreed so I thought I’d got it wrong

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:45

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:42

It doesn’t mean I have no knowledge about the royal family - I got mixed up as someone told me recently she was not in the line

she was never the spare in the way we see Harry as the spare - Anne grew up knowing she wouldn’t come to the throne

the spare argument is centuries old when healthcare and life expectancy wasn’t as good - Anne knew she would never be a Queen and had more freedom

Edited

She was the Spare. When she was next in line after Charles, it was entirely possible that she could inherit the throne.
She had lessons on the British Constitution for this reason.
Supposing Charles pre deceased his mother before Andrew was born?
She would have been the Monarch.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:46

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:27

Quite. Anne has been a very successful and productive "Spare" 😁

Not really Anne knew she wouldn’t ever be queen early on

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:46

noonames · 03/05/2026 17:44

She was 3rd in line when she was born - Charles was 2nd and their mother the heir. Then they all moved up one in 1952.

Yes. So from 1952 until 1960, she was 2nd in line.

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 17:46

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:42

It doesn’t mean I have no knowledge about the royal family - I got mixed up as someone told me recently she was not in the line

she was never the spare in the way we see Harry as the spare - Anne grew up knowing she wouldn’t come to the throne

the spare argument is centuries old when healthcare and life expectancy wasn’t as good - Anne knew she would never be a Queen and had more freedom

Edited

Oh contrary! The highest Harry has ever been in the los is 3rd place! Anne was 2nd at one point! , Harry has not been a real “spare” for quite some time and the only way he would have become one is if his brother died.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:46

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:45

She was the Spare. When she was next in line after Charles, it was entirely possible that she could inherit the throne.
She had lessons on the British Constitution for this reason.
Supposing Charles pre deceased his mother before Andrew was born?
She would have been the Monarch.

By the time she was adolescent she knew - her life has been different to Charles

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:47

I would think they would have lessons on the constitution anyway

noonames · 03/05/2026 17:48

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:46

Yes. So from 1952 until 1960, she was 2nd in line.

Yes - I was correcting a PP who said or at least implied that Anne was 2nd from birth when she wasn’t.

Lunde · 03/05/2026 17:48

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:42

It doesn’t mean I have no knowledge about the royal family - I got mixed up as someone told me recently she was not in the line

she was never the spare in the way we see Harry as the spare - Anne grew up knowing she wouldn’t come to the throne

the spare argument is centuries old when healthcare and life expectancy wasn’t as good - Anne knew she would never be a Queen and had more freedom

Edited

That is nonsense - she was higher than Harry in the Los until she was 10

Nobody knew that the Queen would have more children 10 years after Anne was born
Charles 1948
Anne 1950
AMW 1960
Edward 1964

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:49

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:46

By the time she was adolescent she knew - her life has been different to Charles

That doesn't mean she wasn't the Spare and it certainly doesn't mean she wasn't in the line of succession!
She was the Spare. All her life she has been in the line of succession.
I really don't know what else there is to say!

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:49

Lunde · 03/05/2026 17:48

That is nonsense - she was higher than Harry in the Los until she was 10

Nobody knew that the Queen would have more children 10 years after Anne was born
Charles 1948
Anne 1950
AMW 1960
Edward 1964

Exactly. She was next in line after Charles and tutored accordingly.

IckyIck · 03/05/2026 17:50

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:49

That doesn't mean she wasn't the Spare and it certainly doesn't mean she wasn't in the line of succession!
She was the Spare. All her life she has been in the line of succession.
I really don't know what else there is to say!

She wasn't ever the Spare.

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:50

noonames · 03/05/2026 17:48

Yes - I was correcting a PP who said or at least implied that Anne was 2nd from birth when she wasn’t.

Sorry - I was agreeing with you, if that wasn't clear!

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 17:50

Honestly I thought this was all fairly basic common knowledge!! 🤷‍♀️

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:51

IckyIck · 03/05/2026 17:50

She wasn't ever the Spare.

Dear god.
Between 1952 and 1960 she was.

Lunde · 03/05/2026 17:51

IckyIck · 03/05/2026 17:50

She wasn't ever the Spare.

So who was the spare between 1952 and 1960?

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 17:51

IckyIck · 03/05/2026 17:50

She wasn't ever the Spare.

Yes she was! 🙄

NewGirlInTown · 03/05/2026 17:52

kscarpetta · 02/05/2026 19:41

This is how they make their income, they have to stay relevant and popular.

Personally I don't think adults should be able to exploit kids for money, whether they are public figures, royals, influencers etc but for the time being this is how some families make their living.

Ridiculous. Are you really suggesting that the future King and current beneficiary of the enormously wealthy Duchy of Cornwall generates his income from photos of his children?
Or is your post just badly written and you are referring to common or garden influencers? 😂

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 17:52

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 17:50

Honestly I thought this was all fairly basic common knowledge!! 🤷‍♀️

Why oh why is this so difficult to follow?
I put a link upthread to the LoS!
Do you think people don't know what the words "Spare" or "succession" mean?
It's really very strange!

bluegreygreen · 03/05/2026 17:52

she was never the spare in the way we see Harry as the spare - Anne grew up knowing she wouldn’t come to the throne

Anne was second in line until Andrew was born.

Harry was never higher than third.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:52

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 17:46

Oh contrary! The highest Harry has ever been in the los is 3rd place! Anne was 2nd at one point! , Harry has not been a real “spare” for quite some time and the only way he would have become one is if his brother died.

Edited

Yes but not for long in Anne’s case - only a few years till she dropped to 3 then 4

Anne was second for a few years and with modern life would never have thought she would be queen

i think you are looking at it as if there is a real chance - she would not have viewed it like that

look Henry 8 was not raised to be king - and he was alive in a time where it would be perfectly normal for first in line to die - just as happened

IcedPurple · 03/05/2026 17:53

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 03/05/2026 14:42

Hidden away from view - you appear to be mistaking “not have pictures shared in public and not taken to parents work events” with locking them away.

Many parents refuse to put photos of their children on social media and in the public domain, are they hiding them away?

We arguably have a right to see the working royals, to expect them to show up to important events and represent the UK. We don’t have the same right over the non-working royals. The children are not working royals and as such should be allowed privacy. If they want to be working royals later, then they need training and accepting public scrutiny. Not as children.

Many parents refuse to put photos of their children on social media and in the public domain, are they hiding them away?

Oh come on! You can't possibly be comparing a future King and his siblings with little Jane and Jimmy down the road, can you? Unless the children were totally isolated from the public, and probably not even then, photos of them would leak out. There would a huge incentive for someone to snap that exclusive photo of the future king and sell it to the media. Their schools would be stalked. There would be all sorts of lurid rumours circulating about them. How you think this is preferable to a few carefully controlled photos and appearances, I genuinely fail to understand.

The children are not working royals and as such should be allowed privacy.

They do have privacy. We do not see inside their homes. We don't see them coming or going from school. We have never heard them speak more than a few words. Instead we see them a few times a year, with their parents, in carefully chosen situations appropriate for their ages.

I'm being sincere when I ask you just what is wrong with this arrangement.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 17:53

bluegreygreen · 03/05/2026 17:52

she was never the spare in the way we see Harry as the spare - Anne grew up knowing she wouldn’t come to the throne

Anne was second in line until Andrew was born.

Harry was never higher than third.

Yes and when Andrew was or she knew she wouldn’t be Queen

Swipe left for the next trending thread