Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Royals attending high profile events - business as usual or tone deaf?

205 replies

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 09:29

Over the past week Charles has been at London Fashion Week, Kate at the rugby and her and William at the BAFTAS. They may have attended other things, I don't know.

These are all very high profile events. the sort of thing my late mum would've described as 'glitzy' so I suppose not the less glam outings, or charity events.
In light of the fact no official statement has gone out from the BP, do you think it's appropriate they're still attending this sort of thing, or it's a bit tone deaf considering the conversations happening about the future of the monarchy, how much Charles already knew about Andrew etc?

OP posts:
CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 11:21

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 10:42

No, there is a concerted effort on this site to say all family members were complicit in Andrew’s crimes because it suits a republican agenda, it’s clear as day on all the threads running, so called republicans salivating at what’s happening and taking deep pleasure in twisting a knife into other family members.

I don’t know which family members were complicit. But it is ridiculous to think that Charles and William for two weren’t.

CandiedPrincess · 23/02/2026 11:23

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 11:21

I don’t know which family members were complicit. But it is ridiculous to think that Charles and William for two weren’t.

Do you know what the word actually means?

You actually believe they helped him to commit a crime?

VanCleefArpels · 23/02/2026 11:27

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 10:00

I mean he did know though...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15581065/Email-proves-Charles-warned-brothers-Whistleblower-Palace-Royal-Family-Andrew.html (Daily Mail so people might not want to open but you can see from the headlines what happened)

Also William will have been well aware of the allegations for years now, I mean we all have.

I’m aware of anllegations about lots of people, should I be pilloried as a result? Not do my job as a result? Be expected to apologise or otherwise make up for their wrongdoing? Don’t be silly

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:29

How do you know they are “complicit” give me one example where Edward, Anne, William, Harry, have been complicit?

I said people were blaming them for being complicit or are you saying that isn’t a thing? There hasn’t been lots of articles and radio phone ins, SM discussions etc about how much the Royals knew & how soon the acted?

I already said I don’t believe they didn’t know about the shady finances as there have been articles about it for years.

EvolvedAlready · 23/02/2026 11:30

When I’ve had traumatic events in the past with family members (not grief) I’ve always pulled myself up and did what I needed to do.

what my family members have done do not define me, reflect me or prevent me. Fair play to them. Keep going.
They are not responsible, and shouldn’t be held responsible.

VanCleefArpels · 23/02/2026 11:32

MidWayThruJanuary · 23/02/2026 10:25

@VanCleefArpels
It appears a whistleblower has come forward to say that Charles was warned in 2019 about AMW's activities.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15581065/Email-proves-Charles-warned-brothers-Whistleblower-Palace-Royal-Family-Andrew.html

And what precisely should he have done about it?

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 11:32

@CurlewKate Do tell how William and Charles covered up the rape of trafficked women, I would be very careful if I was you in what you claim is a fact on here.

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:33

They certainly acted far too late with regards to the Epstein/VG stuff and removing titles.

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:34

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 11:32

@CurlewKate Do tell how William and Charles covered up the rape of trafficked women, I would be very careful if I was you in what you claim is a fact on here.

Edited

That post can’t be directed at me because I have not said anything about that. Andrew has not been arrested for anything to do with that has he? Presumably you understand some of us are talking about what he’s been arrested for?

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 11:35

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:29

How do you know they are “complicit” give me one example where Edward, Anne, William, Harry, have been complicit?

I said people were blaming them for being complicit or are you saying that isn’t a thing? There hasn’t been lots of articles and radio phone ins, SM discussions etc about how much the Royals knew & how soon the acted?

I already said I don’t believe they didn’t know about the shady finances as there have been articles about it for years.

So you can’t then.

DuckbilledSplatterPuff · 23/02/2026 11:36

I think Charles's hands were tied whilst the Queen was still alive and in charge. Perhaps he was protecting her. He protested AMW's appointment in Trade, but civil servants who complained about AMW suffered career damage, silencing further speaking out.
It's been hard enough to prise his brother, a publicly proven and spectacular liar, out of the peppercorn rent mansion, and to stop him from inserting himself into public appearances like the Kent funeral.
But as more and more of AMW's vile deeds are exposed and more witnesses come forward, the more the perception is that RF didn't do enough, fast enough, meanwhile he continues to embarrass them and highlight all the many flaws in the antiquated system.

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 11:36

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:34

That post can’t be directed at me because I have not said anything about that. Andrew has not been arrested for anything to do with that has he? Presumably you understand some of us are talking about what he’s been arrested for?

Edited

No not you, quote function didn’t work it’s for @CurlewKate

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:37

@Traceysgoingtobelivid cant what?

YourFluentQuoter · 23/02/2026 11:37

maskymask · 23/02/2026 10:48

No, there is a concerted effort on this site to say all family members were complicit in Andrew’s crimes because it suits a republican agenda

And there’s a concerted effort to say nobody knew a thing. Is it because of a Royalist agenda?

I don't think it means any kind of agenda, but just that people generally don't go around telling people of shit and illegal things they've done.

I worked with a colleague 10 years ago in the NHS that was known to be a bit of an asshole and a bully and possibly taking advantage of junior staff.

I found out some things about him by chance that were just gossip but if true, were gross misconduct and veered into criminal and I whistle-blew. There was an internal and criminal investigation and it turned out what I knew was the tip of the iceberg and I was shocked by what was uncovered.

But what I found out was still vastly more than what 90% of his colleagues and managers knew. All of which had known him for years longer than I.

To the point that during the investigations when I was instructed not to tell anyone of the small bits that I knew and had reported, other colleagues were extremely worried about him, distressed by his suspension and investigation to the point they needed counselling and wondering if it was all bollocks and the poor man was being pushed to the point of possible suicide by all the stress.

Turned out he was a complete wrong'un committing sophisticated crimes over a lengthy period and went to prison for years and was struck off.

And I didn't anticipate that at all and knew him for a few months, let alone all the people who'd known him and considered him a friend for years, invited him to their homes, weddings, etc.

No-one in a public position goes around telling people they know and are even close to, that they're downloading CSAM, using sex workers, abusing DC, beating their wives, using drugs or committing fraud unless they're very sure the people they're telling are doing similar.

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 11:39

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:37

@Traceysgoingtobelivid cant what?

You know full well, the question you avoided answering.

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:40

@Traceysgoingtobelivid Andrew was arrested for misconduct in a public office. I don’t believe no one in the RF had any questions about his conduct before his arrest. You can disagree but it’s not controversial to question and it doesn’t mean Im spending my morning playing with a pitchfork!

Dgll · 23/02/2026 11:40

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 10:18

I don't think he went last year though... I might be wrong.

How much do you monitor these people?!

welshgirl2025 · 23/02/2026 11:40

They are not responsible for Andrew's behaviour. Of course they should carry on with events they had planned for. If they didnt go that would be wrong. So they cant win.

iwouldshagtomhardy · 23/02/2026 11:40

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 09:55

TBH - I don't really know and I do actually find the money spent on jewels, frocks and palaces a bit distasteful anyway.

DSis thinks it's fine and think BAU is definitely the right way for them to go about things.

Are you aware the dress Catherine wore last night is 7 years old ?

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:41

@Traceysgoingtobelivid read my earlier posts on the thread. I already said I don’t believe no one knew a thing.

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 11:42

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:40

@Traceysgoingtobelivid Andrew was arrested for misconduct in a public office. I don’t believe no one in the RF had any questions about his conduct before his arrest. You can disagree but it’s not controversial to question and it doesn’t mean Im spending my morning playing with a pitchfork!

Ah, you believe! well that’s it then case closed 🙄

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 11:45

maskymask · 23/02/2026 11:34

That post can’t be directed at me because I have not said anything about that. Andrew has not been arrested for anything to do with that has he? Presumably you understand some of us are talking about what he’s been arrested for?

Edited

They were either complicit in AMW’s various misdemeanors OR were extraordinarily incurious OR were extraordinarily stupid.

BeeCucumber · 23/02/2026 11:46

BAU

iwouldshagtomhardy · 23/02/2026 11:46

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 10:34

But there is a big difference between blaming other family members for AMW’s crimes and questioning their complicity in what even the most ardent monarchists must accept was a cover up. There appears to be a concerted attempt to conflate the two.

You're just gossiping now. It would be the same thing if I said " well I'm sure Meghan Markle knew Andrew before and partied with him " 🤷‍♀️ it's all just gossip that at this moment is unfounded.

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 11:47

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 11:45

They were either complicit in AMW’s various misdemeanors OR were extraordinarily incurious OR were extraordinarily stupid.

Sorry-this post was for@Traceysgoingtobelivid

Swipe left for the next trending thread