Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Royals attending high profile events - business as usual or tone deaf?

205 replies

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 09:29

Over the past week Charles has been at London Fashion Week, Kate at the rugby and her and William at the BAFTAS. They may have attended other things, I don't know.

These are all very high profile events. the sort of thing my late mum would've described as 'glitzy' so I suppose not the less glam outings, or charity events.
In light of the fact no official statement has gone out from the BP, do you think it's appropriate they're still attending this sort of thing, or it's a bit tone deaf considering the conversations happening about the future of the monarchy, how much Charles already knew about Andrew etc?

OP posts:
PistachioTiramisu · 23/02/2026 10:27

Bertiebiscuit · 23/02/2026 10:00

Tone deaf as always,these pointless leeches in their ludicrously expensive clothes, rubbing it in to us poor cash strapped plebs how sweet life is if you never have to pay for anything. "off with their heads" 🤣🤣

What would you have them wear - jeans and a sweatshirt? - to an event where even the least well-known actress will be wearing a statement dress which probably costs thousands of pounds?

Mylovelygreendress · 23/02/2026 10:29

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 10:25

He’s the fucking President of BAFTA for gods sake, this trying to pin Andrew’s crimes on every member of the RF is so tedious, there are a loads of other threads blaming Charles, William, Anne, Edward, join in in one of those pitchfork threads, you don’t need to start another one.

💯 agree 👏

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 10:30

They are right to “business as usual” IMHO. It’s what else they do and say that’s important.

CloakedInGucci · 23/02/2026 10:34

I’d be happy to see the monarchy abolished. But I think that given it does currently exist, the RF should continue with whatever engagements they have.

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 10:34

But there is a big difference between blaming other family members for AMW’s crimes and questioning their complicity in what even the most ardent monarchists must accept was a cover up. There appears to be a concerted attempt to conflate the two.

YourFluentQuoter · 23/02/2026 10:37

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 10:34

But there is a big difference between blaming other family members for AMW’s crimes and questioning their complicity in what even the most ardent monarchists must accept was a cover up. There appears to be a concerted attempt to conflate the two.

What was covered up? By whom?

Justdancevance · 23/02/2026 10:37

KC and PW will have been advised to say nothing, the last thing anyone wants is that any Trial fails due to public comments made by either of them.

They will have to say nothing until any criminal investigation is concluded. The only thing they can do is advice their staff to fully comply with the investigation.

TheKittenswithMittens · 23/02/2026 10:37

According to the BBC, the taxpayer picked up the tab for Andrews massages when on business. It's going to get worse.

MissMoneyFairy · 23/02/2026 10:40

The only thing I found really inappropriate was the airing of The Lady on tv last night which is a drama series about fergie and her dresser jane. The rest of the engagements should go ahead, why shouldn't they, let's not turn this into another rf bashing thread again.

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 10:42

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 10:34

But there is a big difference between blaming other family members for AMW’s crimes and questioning their complicity in what even the most ardent monarchists must accept was a cover up. There appears to be a concerted attempt to conflate the two.

No, there is a concerted effort on this site to say all family members were complicit in Andrew’s crimes because it suits a republican agenda, it’s clear as day on all the threads running, so called republicans salivating at what’s happening and taking deep pleasure in twisting a knife into other family members.

maskymask · 23/02/2026 10:48

No, there is a concerted effort on this site to say all family members were complicit in Andrew’s crimes because it suits a republican agenda

And there’s a concerted effort to say nobody knew a thing. Is it because of a Royalist agenda?

waddleandtoddle · 23/02/2026 10:48

The RF will become more important in the coming years, particularly if we do get the forecast big swing in politics. The RF have a lot of levers to keep government from completely deprioritising things such as sustainability, SEND, health. Let them keep the glitz. I'd probably go as far to say that Camilla could be doing far more on promoting her female causes and Kate needs to set out a stronger strategy for her causes, particularly as her children are getting older and her health improves. Visits by Royals still catalyse people coming together on issues.

Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 10:50

maskymask · 23/02/2026 10:48

No, there is a concerted effort on this site to say all family members were complicit in Andrew’s crimes because it suits a republican agenda

And there’s a concerted effort to say nobody knew a thing. Is it because of a Royalist agenda?

No, it’s a fairness agenda, you may be happy blaming family members for another’s crime, I’m not.

flapjackfairy · 23/02/2026 10:50

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 09:41

A 5 line statement from King Charles, which addresses only Andrew's arrest.

well what else do you expect ? You are being ridiculous. Charles and co.have made their position clear on Andrew and cannot comment further even if they wanted to..

CandiedPrincess · 23/02/2026 10:52

Business as usual. What do you expect them to do? They have every right to get on with their lives and they have jobs to do. Charles made a quite clear statement and I don't think anyone should expect anything else.

maskymask · 23/02/2026 10:53

@Traceysgoingtobelivid are people blaming them for the crime or for being complicit? It’s two separate things. You may be happy looking the other way but not everyone is.

Hoolahoophop · 23/02/2026 10:53

maskymask · 23/02/2026 10:48

No, there is a concerted effort on this site to say all family members were complicit in Andrew’s crimes because it suits a republican agenda

And there’s a concerted effort to say nobody knew a thing. Is it because of a Royalist agenda?

Of course, there is both and the truth lies somewhere in the middle. As ever.

FairKoala · 23/02/2026 10:54

FairKoala · 23/02/2026 10:20

If anything I don’t see any member of the royal family as being extravagant. (Apart from Meghan and Sarah, are they still considered to be royal?) I don’t think it’s in their nature.

Charles isn’t pulling down a wing of a perfectly good royal residence and erecting something that resembles an Olive Garden.

I also don’t see Kate Camilla, Sophie or Anne etc as being extravagant clothes horses. They always appear to be in outfits that will be brought out again sometimes years later

It’s a mixture of showing off British designers recycling outfits already seen by the general public and wearing outfits that are loaned for £0 to them

Edited

Also the jewels and “palaces” (isn’t it singular) or any of the residences for the most part have been in the family for centuries. Even a lot of the jewels were gifts.

It’s how the rich stay rich. They don’t chuck everything away on a whim.
They buy once and keep it for ever.

They don’t buy cheap throw away fashion and chipboard furniture that falls apart before they do.

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 10:55

MissMoneyFairy · 23/02/2026 10:40

The only thing I found really inappropriate was the airing of The Lady on tv last night which is a drama series about fergie and her dresser jane. The rest of the engagements should go ahead, why shouldn't they, let's not turn this into another rf bashing thread again.

I think Natalie Dorman has backed out of any publicity for this show in light of the revelations about Sarah Ferguson.

OP posts:
Traceysgoingtobelivid · 23/02/2026 10:57

maskymask · 23/02/2026 10:53

@Traceysgoingtobelivid are people blaming them for the crime or for being complicit? It’s two separate things. You may be happy looking the other way but not everyone is.

How do you know they are “complicit” give me one example where Edward, Anne, William, Harry, have been complicit?

ERthree · 23/02/2026 11:04

It is just a witch hunt now. Should every relative of anyone that is accused of a crime be held under house arrest, have their assets removed and be made to suffer ?

Applecup · 23/02/2026 11:06

Another day, another thread knocking the Royals. What are you expecting - that they put their heads down and hide away? Then you can post a 'Why are the Royals hiding away - are they ashamed' thread. With people like you they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

IAmATorturedPoet · 23/02/2026 11:08

Hoolahoophop · 23/02/2026 10:26

While it's not their fault how their uncle has acted they could start to do / attend events that maybe showed there was some self reflection within the family as a whole.

Like what?

They attend events they are invited to, and which align with their individual areas. They cant all go chasing the same causes

So KC has always been passionate about the environment, sustainable farming, UK farming etc. He is also big on arts, he's a sensitive sole not really a warrior king.

PrincessofW has decided early years is her thing.

PrinceofW is going hard on the environment, maybe a bit of a crossover with his Dad there.

QC I know she likes books! She also supports causes around domestic and sexual violence.

DuchessesofE supports women's rights and has had some visits abroad in support of women victims which is truly harrowing and should have been given more air time than it was as it could have been used to bring so much more attention to the dire lives some women are forced to live, mostly due to male violence.

DukeofE is young people based.

Princess Anne seems to just to anything any everything she is asked to!

Just because Andrew has been caught out in his despicable behavior it doesn't mean the family should give up any support of the environment and become campaigners for justice for the women who were victims of Epstein and his cronies. Just leave QC and Duchess of E to continue their work all women victims as they have been doing.

👏 👏

Thedom · 23/02/2026 11:16

lindabysteven · 23/02/2026 10:00

I mean he did know though...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15581065/Email-proves-Charles-warned-brothers-Whistleblower-Palace-Royal-Family-Andrew.html (Daily Mail so people might not want to open but you can see from the headlines what happened)

Also William will have been well aware of the allegations for years now, I mean we all have.

Andrew was working for the government in his Trade Envoy role, why would the Prince of Wales be in a position to intervene ? Evidence is now coming out that the relevant governments were being warned at a top level about AMW abusing the role and abusing tax payer money for years prior to that 2019 email to the Prince of Wales secretary.

David Cameron, the then Prime minister, even came out in support of Andrew claiming he was going a great job, a few short months before Andrew was forced to quit. Its clear government officials at a high level were repeatedly being made aware of AMW abuse of his government role, and did nothing.

CurlewKate · 23/02/2026 11:18

ERthree · 23/02/2026 11:04

It is just a witch hunt now. Should every relative of anyone that is accused of a crime be held under house arrest, have their assets removed and be made to suffer ?

No. And nobody is suggesting anything of the sort.

Swipe left for the next trending thread