Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Should Beatrice and Eugenie voluntarily give up their titles if they want any public respect ever again?

572 replies

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

OP posts:
lizziebuck · 23/02/2026 18:32

If he gets removed from the succession (as is being talked about) would they also ?

whackwhackoops · 23/02/2026 18:33

lizziebuck · 23/02/2026 18:32

If he gets removed from the succession (as is being talked about) would they also ?

Or do they move up the chain?! Good question but I suspect they would be remain royal by birth

JournalistEmily · 23/02/2026 18:36

No. They have nothing to do with this.

JuliettaCaeser · 23/02/2026 18:43

The royal family take us all for fools. They are enriching themselves like crazy at our expense. It’s absolutely outrageous if you think about it.

BoxingHare · 23/02/2026 18:46

JuliettaCaeser · 23/02/2026 18:43

The royal family take us all for fools. They are enriching themselves like crazy at our expense. It’s absolutely outrageous if you think about it.

I think William is tucking money away from the Duchy etc in case it ends during his reign.

SameIssue · 23/02/2026 18:47

ZenNudist · 22/02/2026 09:34

They are the late queen's granddaughters and haven't done anything wrong have they?. Stop the witch-hunt.

Late queen herself has been an accomplice by knowingly providing protection and cover to her paedophile son…

Freud2 · 23/02/2026 18:48

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 22/02/2026 10:17

No, but their own behaviour should. And that includes willingly associating with Jeffrey Epstein after his release from prison. The fact that after this was revealed they didn't even bother to put a statement out apologising for "misjudgement" and condemning his crimes shows they don't give a fuck.

They were also the beneficiary of thousands of pounds"gifted" to them - also expensive jewelry- by rich Arabs that Andrew was canoodling with.
Weren't they curious about where the money came from or did they turn a blind eye?

BeardofHagrid · 23/02/2026 18:52

I can’t think of anyone I know who would even roll out of bed to get a glimpse of them. They should retire from the public view, go live a quiet life somewhere. No one is interested.

Strawberrydelight78 · 23/02/2026 18:52

My dad's a pedophile do I deserve to be punished?

Tuesdayschild50 · 23/02/2026 18:57

What have they done wrong... its not a witch hunt .

Charmian1957 · 23/02/2026 19:00

My feelings exactly. Of course they knew who they were going to see. They should have refused to go. And when the news of their fathers behaviour especially & their Mother's not much better, they should have backed away & volunteered to give up their Royal titles. They have used them for their own benefit. Let them work as ordinary people, if possible. Princess Anbe did the right thing & didn't want royal titles for her children. Fair enough for the heir to the throne & in this case William & his heirs to have Prince/Princess titles. But Georfe will become King so his heirs can have Prince/Princess titles. But Charlotte & Louis children should not. Anymore than Harry & Megan's children should have, even more so when Harry & Megan have left the UK. So yes Beatrice & Eugene should give up their titles, their behaviour has been stupid. Going to Amwrica to have lunch with Epstein with their Mother. 5 says after his release from prison for child sex offences. And to publicly stand with their father unrltil things got very ugly. See him in private if they must, but not in public. They are in their 30's with children of their own & husbands. They should be their concern now & they do not need Princess titles to be a mother or a wife.

Henhipster · 23/02/2026 19:00

MylipstickiscalledHugMe · 22/02/2026 11:14

All I know is your brain can very effectively protect you from certain uncomfortable realisations about your parents.

I don't think we have enough information to judge them. Have they themselves abused anyone or commited any crimes? Not that we're aware of. Can they see reality clearly and are immorally supporting their parents? Maybe yes, maybe no.

Eugenie is founded an anti-slavery organisation. I think given this it would be useful for her to distance herself from her parents or at least comment.

CharlotteRumpling · 23/02/2026 19:02

Henhipster · 23/02/2026 19:00

Eugenie is founded an anti-slavery organisation. I think given this it would be useful for her to distance herself from her parents or at least comment.

You couldn't make it up.

Ponderingwindow · 23/02/2026 19:06

Being around their parents and their parents friends as late teens and young adults signals to me that they were more likely victims than up to anything nefarious.

Setting boundaries with your problematic parents is difficult no matter how much privilege you have. We are supposed to get unconditional love and approval from our parents. If instead you get someone who hurts you or other people, it isn’t easy to break away.

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 23/02/2026 19:07

No people shouldn’t be forced to give something up/be responsible for their relatives behaviours. It’s not their fault

Charmian1957 · 23/02/2026 19:08

I wouldn't advertise about your father. But if you have not been keeping company with your father's possible adult friends that may have been involved, then you have done no wrong. But I hope you have distanced yourself from your father, especially if you have children.

MayaPinion · 23/02/2026 19:08

derxa · 22/02/2026 10:31

Zara is an Olympian. She didn’t achieve that by being a member of the RF.

No, but she did achieve it by having access to the best horses, the best trainers, and the best facilities - something that life as royal is easy to buy.

Superhansrantowindsor · 23/02/2026 19:16

What does it even mean though - Princess.
surely anyone can call themselves Princess. Peter Andres dd is called Princess.
If they have done nothing wrong they should not be punished for their fathers mistakes.

changeme4this · 23/02/2026 19:16

For a slimmed down monarchy I don’t think they need to be showcased nor a working royal, esp. as the throne line gets longer and they move down the possibility of holding the title.

if it was solely based on their parents antics, then I would say leave them alone.

Snowyowl99 · 23/02/2026 19:16

TheignT · 22/02/2026 10:12

I dont know much about them but I do remember one had surgery on her back when she was a child. She reportedly chose a wedding dress with a low back to show the scar as an example to children going through the surgery that it was nothing to be ashamed of.

No idea which one it was or if it was true but it did strike me as a positive thing to do, if she did it.

Yes that was Eugenie

Allisnotlost1 · 23/02/2026 19:17

Viviennemary · 22/02/2026 09:56

They are a pair of grifters. Everything they have is because of their royal position. Without it they would be nothing.

That’s true of all of them isn’t it? Whether they’ve done something good with what they’ve been given or not, the fact is it’s all been handed to them on a plate.

Zippedydodah · 23/02/2026 19:22

I don’t understand why Charles is said to be very fond of them, so I suspect they won’t get investigated in any way.

Fatandknowit · 23/02/2026 19:26

Their parents' actions have literally nothing to do with them. Like them or not - fine, but to suggest that they should have titles stripped because of their mingin' dad and the fact that they love him/haven't involved themselves in speaking up about him, is ridiculous. He no doubt lies to them as much as he lies to everyone else. They didn't choose their parents or their upbringing.

Longshinyhair · 23/02/2026 19:31

LemonTT · 23/02/2026 08:55

I got your point. But inherited titles are different from titles conferred because your grandmother was the constitutional head of state. That’s why their father was stripped of his titles. Which can’t be done to members of the aristocracy.

They have far more meaning and are directly linked to our democracy and identity as a nation.

This family commercialised those titles and exploited them. They continue to grift off those titles whilst tarnishing the national identity.

There are questions to be asked about other relatives, the Tindels, the Parker Bowles and Middletons. They seem to be all making coin out of their connection and they all seem well connected to the tabloid media. Time for some rules and some proper organisation and governance for our constitutional monarch. No more patronage, soft and unaccountable power.

There are questions to be asked about other relatives, the Tindels, the Parker Bowles and Middletons. They seem to be all making coin out of their connection and they all seem well connected to the tabloid media

You seem to have left The Duke and Duchess of Sussex off your list.

plasbks · 23/02/2026 19:33

I don't really understand the giving up titles stuff. Andrew is the late queen's son and he's the king's brother. he was born a prince and is a prince, despite being one of the most odious, wicked cunts to walk the earth. But, he's still a prince, even if he's not allowed to say it.