Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Should Beatrice and Eugenie voluntarily give up their titles if they want any public respect ever again?

572 replies

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

OP posts:
TheignT · 23/02/2026 11:42

nicepotoftea · 23/02/2026 11:33

During her lifetime the Queen paid Andrew millions and provided housing for the family. They were never going to face the ordinary money problems of her subjects.

Their problem was their spending.

Yes they overspent by all accounts but you said their family funds had been enriched and from all accounts they don't have family funds. B&E are reported to have inherited money and I'm assuming their husbands aren't penniless. Let's hope they don't follow their parents example.

nicepotoftea · 23/02/2026 11:53

TheignT · 23/02/2026 11:42

Yes they overspent by all accounts but you said their family funds had been enriched and from all accounts they don't have family funds. B&E are reported to have inherited money and I'm assuming their husbands aren't penniless. Let's hope they don't follow their parents example.

family funds had been enriched and from all accounts they don't have family funds

I don't understand the point you are making - the fact that the money has been spent by the family does not mean that it didn't exist or isn't relevant.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 23/02/2026 13:20

TheignT · 23/02/2026 11:24

You realise the money your relative was stealing was other people's money. I think you are choosing to minimise what he did. There aren't really any victimless crimes and he will have harmed people even if you can't accept that.

As for B&E I think the legal advice is for everyone to wait for the investigation to be over. If they have useful info they should be sharing it with the police not the general public.

In am not minimising anything, I already said there was no excuse. It's a burden my auntie and the rest of us will always carry and I certainly don't need to justify myself to you.

The only reason I brought it up was because I was being accused of saying that anyone who had lunch with someone after they've been to prison is accountable for their crime or some such rubbish. But I'm not going to respond to any more personal accusations either.

I'm not accusing B&E of any crime when it comes to Epstein, unlike their father. But they chose to mingle with him as a convicted sex offender and presumably there was an agenda behind that. What did they gain from it. That's all I'm interested in.

CathyorClaire · 23/02/2026 14:47

Neither of them need to be 'working royals', they are both married to wealthy men and no doubt have money in their own right, can be independent of the family.

I'm not convinced the husbands are super wealthy.

The property developer's accounts are filed with exemptions for small business plus he recently lost a contract in Australia when the company behind the project went into administration along with another cosy contract to gussy up RL (the way the royals keep awarding lucrative contracts among themselves is something else I'd like looked at.)

Brooksbank is basically a glorified estate agent.

I do agree B&E probably have some hefty family money behind them though.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 23/02/2026 17:11

LemonTT · 23/02/2026 08:55

I got your point. But inherited titles are different from titles conferred because your grandmother was the constitutional head of state. That’s why their father was stripped of his titles. Which can’t be done to members of the aristocracy.

They have far more meaning and are directly linked to our democracy and identity as a nation.

This family commercialised those titles and exploited them. They continue to grift off those titles whilst tarnishing the national identity.

There are questions to be asked about other relatives, the Tindels, the Parker Bowles and Middletons. They seem to be all making coin out of their connection and they all seem well connected to the tabloid media. Time for some rules and some proper organisation and governance for our constitutional monarch. No more patronage, soft and unaccountable power.

You say that you got my point, but none of the above is actually relevant to the point, so I'm not so sure.

CommonlyKnownAs · 23/02/2026 17:12

CathyorClaire · 23/02/2026 14:47

Neither of them need to be 'working royals', they are both married to wealthy men and no doubt have money in their own right, can be independent of the family.

I'm not convinced the husbands are super wealthy.

The property developer's accounts are filed with exemptions for small business plus he recently lost a contract in Australia when the company behind the project went into administration along with another cosy contract to gussy up RL (the way the royals keep awarding lucrative contracts among themselves is something else I'd like looked at.)

Brooksbank is basically a glorified estate agent.

I do agree B&E probably have some hefty family money behind them though.

The general consensus seems to be that their grandmother left all 8 GC money and their great grandmother had a trust for the GGC. So unless the pair of them have inherited their parents spending habits, they should be well enough set.

Middlechild3 · 23/02/2026 17:18

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

They aren't working Royals so should give up their grace and favour appartments and titles. They benefit greatly without putting anything back.

Hameth · 23/02/2026 17:53

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

And come clean on who funded their constant holidays in their 20s

Snakebite61 · 23/02/2026 17:58

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

They should all give them up. Then boot them out of the country.

Hameth · 23/02/2026 17:59

And come clean on who funded their constant holidays in their 20s.

Dawnb19 · 23/02/2026 18:00

I think only the king/future kings children should have a title. Only prince Charles children (William and Harry) and William's children. I don't think Harry's children or princess Anne's (they don't anyway), Andrews or Prince Edwards children should have a title.

LouiseK93 · 23/02/2026 18:01

No! They've done F All wrong.

Bunny65 · 23/02/2026 18:02

I agree they should give up their titles which are wholly unnecessary. They were also mired in this. Beatrice even advised her father over the Newsnight interview, met Epstein with her mother after he got out of prison and traded off her father’s dodgy contacts in the UAE, using her title. They aren’t responsible for their parents of course but they are tarnished irrevocably by association and need to put some clear water between them if they want to recover reputationally.

Dawnb19 · 23/02/2026 18:13

LouiseK93 · 23/02/2026 18:01

No! They've done F All wrong.

They are mentioned in the emails meeting up with Epstein after he was released from prison. They were 19 and 20 but I think they just went along with their mum and wasn't involved with any of it. Still it was all over the news about him so they could have refused to go.

Sometimessmiling · 23/02/2026 18:19

ZenNudist · 22/02/2026 09:34

They are the late queen's granddaughters and haven't done anything wrong have they?. Stop the witch-hunt.

You might want to think about the victims. They went to lunch with a paedo
They have taken money from well off people from The Middle East.
One of them told Andrew to lie about Pizza Express. She also helped her mum write a grovelling letter to Epstein. Told Fergie Grovelling was the best bet.
They showed People Epstein's friends around Palaces as a favour. So you are happy to ignore this.

CoolShoeshine · 23/02/2026 18:23

I.dont have a problem with them keeping their titles and feel sorry for them having such awful parents. However I their circumstances I would, for the sake of good pr, give up my title voluntarily, live a modest lifestyle. They'll still have privileges but best to not ram it down the public's throats.

dubbie · 23/02/2026 18:24

"respect" ha ha ha

Scottishskifun · 23/02/2026 18:25

No because we are no longer in the Victorian times where the acts of 1 family member causes everyone to become social outcasts.

Agree with other posters stop witch hunting against 2 women who have their own families because their dad is terrible and their mother has dodgy judgement and took them at 18 for dinner!

Lavagirl · 23/02/2026 18:26

LittleBearPad · 22/02/2026 09:35

They should cooperate with the police investigation. Otherwise they should keep their heads down.

'Keeping your head down' when victims of appalling abuse have died without seeing justice done isnt ok, particularly if you’ve indirectly benefitted from the spoils of daddys very rich paedophile friends. And partied with them, entertained them, been hosted by them etc. Making a public stand against abuse and rejecting the system that has made it possible is the right thing to do

Rewis · 23/02/2026 18:26

I don't think they should give up their titles and I don't think Andrew should have either. I kinda feel like if you're queens child, you're a prince and you can't be fired unless there is a revolution. I hope he ends up in prison but I also think if there are royals then you need to accept the bad ones having a title aswell cause it is their birthright.

DiabeticChocolateLover · 23/02/2026 18:27

I'm sick of people defending them. Beatrice had 13 holidays in one year on a salary of 19,200. Not just cheap and cheerful ones either. Of course the knew once they were old enough and therefore complicit.

simpsonthecat · 23/02/2026 18:28

DiabeticChocolateLover · 23/02/2026 18:27

I'm sick of people defending them. Beatrice had 13 holidays in one year on a salary of 19,200. Not just cheap and cheerful ones either. Of course the knew once they were old enough and therefore complicit.

That's wrong. It was actually 17 holidays!

Ihateboris · 23/02/2026 18:30

DiabeticChocolateLover · 23/02/2026 18:27

I'm sick of people defending them. Beatrice had 13 holidays in one year on a salary of 19,200. Not just cheap and cheerful ones either. Of course the knew once they were old enough and therefore complicit.

I agree. I think they're money grabbing grifters like their leach of a mother.

whackwhackoops · 23/02/2026 18:30

They should have been arrested years ago for wearing those awful hats at Will & Kate’s wedding imho. They had a choice there too!

Abra1t · 23/02/2026 18:31

If they weren’t in the York family they’d be regarded with sympathy, as young women tangled up in a very sinister and awful business by their parents.