Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Should Beatrice and Eugenie voluntarily give up their titles if they want any public respect ever again?

572 replies

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

OP posts:
TrackerTracey · 22/02/2026 13:42

In official protocol (e.g. the Court Circular) they have already given up their York association in their titles. Since their marriages, they have been styled "Her Royal Highness Princess Eugenie, Mrs Jack Brooksbank" and Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrice, Mrs Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi".

Sometimes it is hosting event companies and the media who wrongly refer to them as "of York" in publications.

CathyorClaire · 22/02/2026 13:43

PistachioTiramisu · 22/02/2026 13:27

After reading many, many posts on this thread and others on broadly the same subject, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases a spark of jealousy is colouring people's comments. I feel some people are stamping their little feet and complaining IT'S NOT FAIR that the RF has loads of money, titles, free accommodation, etc, when I don't. It is not very edifying. Sure, I'd love to move in those circles, but I don't so I have to accept that, but I still want there to be a RF as our 'first family'.

Haven't seen 'you're all just jellus' trotted out for a while 😂

Nothing to do with jealousy.

Everything to do with the money sucked from public finances, lack of transparency and accountability and the simple injustices of having the next one up imposed in perpetuity and having no means of getting rid if we want or need to.

nicepotoftea · 22/02/2026 13:45

igelkott2026 · 22/02/2026 13:34

I'd be really annoyed if someone blamed me for my father or mother's wrongdoing.

Why is everyone on MN obsessed with blaming people for the activities of other members of their family? Every time someone does something wrong it's because of poor "parenting" (because, apparently, nobody has free will). And now we're blaming two young women for the antics of their unpleasant father (who, remember, has not been found guilty by a court of anything criminal - yet).

I don't know if you are all lemmings who copy each other, but I have my own free will and personality and no doubt Beatrice and Eugenie do too.

Edited

Why is everyone on MN obsessed with blaming people for the activities of other members of their family?

I think B&E are pretty easy to ignore, but the whole point of the Royal Family is that they have value because of an accident of birth. If we learn nothing else from this whole mess, we should at least understand that Andrew's only value to Epstein and others was his place in the Royal Family.

B&E have certainly been entertained by some pretty dodgy people because they are princesses. Their parents obviously lacked a moral compass and the rest of the Royal family turned a blind eye to whatever the Yorks were doing, so their behaviour should be scrutinised now.

DrCalLightman · 22/02/2026 13:49

derxa · 22/02/2026 10:31

Zara is an Olympian. She didn’t achieve that by being a member of the RF.

But would she have got there if not surrounded by privilege and the best money can (and can't) buy?

Maybe? Maybe not.

Rachie1973 · 22/02/2026 13:51

Sweetiedarling7 · 22/02/2026 09:30

Just that really.
I think the only possible way forward for them is to choose to give up the princess thing, make a brief public statement in support of victims and to end their middle east business jaunts.

No.

Teenagehorrorbag · 22/02/2026 13:52

No....!! Haven't you seen Ghosts? There's a reason she's called Fanny...🤣🤣.

My 17yr old DD says absolutely not!!!

MrsMitford3 · 22/02/2026 13:53

I do think B&E enjoyed a lot of wild perks from rich people-
Saw one year when Beatrice made £19,500 she went on 17 foreign holidays-someone totted them up to be worth approx £300,000.
They def grew up with different rules and even taking that much time off from work is crazy and entitled.

I don't care that much if they keep the Princess but I think they'd be much better off with heads down and keeping that all quiet.

I also think Andrew absolutely must be removed from the line of succession-and then B&E would also be removed as they have no claim without Andrew.

Bunnycat101 · 22/02/2026 13:54

They are curious tbh. I suspect their childhood was a bit fucked up and they shouldn’t be blamed for the poor behaviour of their father. However, they have always come across as a bit dim, entitled and workshy and there seems to be some dubious activity in the Middle East. There is the the matter of having met with Epstein. They were old enough to know better at that point but honestly what parent dangles their kids in front of that sort of monster anyway (leading to the first point about most likely having a fucked up childhood).

In contrast, if you look at Lady Louise and Zara- both have had much more positive press coverage and while obviously very wealthy seem to have been raised with a different set of expectations.

simpsonthecat · 22/02/2026 13:55

TrackerTracey · 22/02/2026 13:42

In official protocol (e.g. the Court Circular) they have already given up their York association in their titles. Since their marriages, they have been styled "Her Royal Highness Princess Eugenie, Mrs Jack Brooksbank" and Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrice, Mrs Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi".

Sometimes it is hosting event companies and the media who wrongly refer to them as "of York" in publications.

That's funny. So Beatrice didn't call herself Beatrice, Princess of York. When invites were sent out.

Any excuse for them by the sounds of it

ChattyCatty25 · 22/02/2026 13:55

It would be a bad idea to give up their titles right now, they aren’t accused of anything yet so it would just make them look guilty. They are doing the right thing by not rocking the boat.

likeafishneedsabike · 22/02/2026 13:57

Nickyknackered · 22/02/2026 10:11

I also think, they are potential victims (not sexual abuse but neglect of good parenting and providers of moral compass). Growing up with a parent doing this kind of behaviour and poor morals at the very least will have affected them. Their mother isnt much better with her bribery dealings etc.

This 100 percent

ThatCyanCat · 22/02/2026 13:58

Honestly I don't think their titles are any more useless and pointless now than they were before.

TrackerTracey · 22/02/2026 14:02

Bunnycat101 · 22/02/2026 13:54

They are curious tbh. I suspect their childhood was a bit fucked up and they shouldn’t be blamed for the poor behaviour of their father. However, they have always come across as a bit dim, entitled and workshy and there seems to be some dubious activity in the Middle East. There is the the matter of having met with Epstein. They were old enough to know better at that point but honestly what parent dangles their kids in front of that sort of monster anyway (leading to the first point about most likely having a fucked up childhood).

In contrast, if you look at Lady Louise and Zara- both have had much more positive press coverage and while obviously very wealthy seem to have been raised with a different set of expectations.

Edited

they have always come across as a bit dim, entitled and workshy

And this comment is based on what, exactly?

Have you ever bothered to research them? They both got degrees from good universities and have worked a variety of the sorts of jobs someone of their social status would normally do (auctions, the arts, charities, investment businesses etc).

Stop making up bollocks just to suit your agenda.

Livelovebehappy · 22/02/2026 14:08

Chesterdrawss · 22/02/2026 13:07

No not squirm - but the opposite - to stand up with integrity for truth - if they know he is lying they should speak out.
Especially if they represent anti trafficking charities (is that a self serving calculated fig leaf?)

Think they would have been 11 ish in 2001 - so well able to remember a party. What about the staff, the other parents, the birthday girl, the police protection people?

Give over. They’re Royalty. Parties were probably had every weekend. We’re talking 25 years ago, when they were 11. Of course they won’t remember a party at Pizza Express. And yes, what about the staff, other parents, police protection? If they remember and have something to contribute, then let them come forward. The fact that they haven’t probably indicates they can’t remember either.

RainbowBagels · 22/02/2026 14:09

TrackerTracey · 22/02/2026 14:02

they have always come across as a bit dim, entitled and workshy

And this comment is based on what, exactly?

Have you ever bothered to research them? They both got degrees from good universities and have worked a variety of the sorts of jobs someone of their social status would normally do (auctions, the arts, charities, investment businesses etc).

Stop making up bollocks just to suit your agenda.

They spent quite a lot of time when they were meant to be working on holiday. Their ' arts and auction house' jobs were basically at the time seem as allowing their names to go on letterheads. How do art degrees suddenly make you a tech expert running around doing speaking tours of the Middle East? They are all on the make.

Lifeomars · 22/02/2026 14:10

Jollyhockeystickss · 22/02/2026 13:41

Andrew has not been charged yes hes a vile arrogent man but hes not been charged, he actually has done nothing illegal or he would have been charged...the ongoing witch hunt of famous people in this country has to stop..the BE KIND means nothing

He's not been charged yet, the investigations are ongoing. Of course he may never be charged but at this momement in time no statement has been made saying he was released from police custody and that this was the end of the matter. His former home at Royal Lodge is still being searched (22 Feb) and the police have been there for four days now. It is an active case

RainbowBagels · 22/02/2026 14:11

Livelovebehappy · 22/02/2026 14:08

Give over. They’re Royalty. Parties were probably had every weekend. We’re talking 25 years ago, when they were 11. Of course they won’t remember a party at Pizza Express. And yes, what about the staff, other parents, police protection? If they remember and have something to contribute, then let them come forward. The fact that they haven’t probably indicates they can’t remember either.

They can't remember Prince Andrew dropping his daughter off to their daughter's birthday party? Or did it not happen, do you think?

derxa · 22/02/2026 14:13

DrCalLightman · 22/02/2026 13:49

But would she have got there if not surrounded by privilege and the best money can (and can't) buy?

Maybe? Maybe not.

None of David Beckham’s sons are top footballers. Zara had to put in a lot of hard work to achieve what she did. She also had the advantage of having two eventing parents. It’s quite sad though that she is not given credit for her achievements on here. Pathetic

Bunnycat101 · 22/02/2026 14:14

TrackerTracey · 22/02/2026 14:02

they have always come across as a bit dim, entitled and workshy

And this comment is based on what, exactly?

Have you ever bothered to research them? They both got degrees from good universities and have worked a variety of the sorts of jobs someone of their social status would normally do (auctions, the arts, charities, investment businesses etc).

Stop making up bollocks just to suit your agenda.

Oh come off it. I’m not making up bollocks/ there has clearly been a thread running though the press for years about them. The Windsors is obviously extreme satire but the portrayal of the sisters in that didn’t come from nothing. As I said, there will be a reason why their cousins largely have had an easier ride in the press.

There is a lot about how they have ‘normal jobs’ that’s clearly not true either. No other ‘employee’ gets the level of holiday they seem to.

x2boys · 22/02/2026 14:18

derxa · 22/02/2026 14:13

None of David Beckham’s sons are top footballers. Zara had to put in a lot of hard work to achieve what she did. She also had the advantage of having two eventing parents. It’s quite sad though that she is not given credit for her achievements on here. Pathetic

Thats becsuse theu are not talented enough
Wayne Rooneys son Kai seens to be doing ok though but even with talent money and contacts help enormously
"Joe Bloggs" could for example be just as talented as Kai Rooney but he doesn't have a Dad that used to play for the Premier league who is not only loaded but has good contacts

idontknowhowtodreamyourdreams · 22/02/2026 14:20

They aren’t responsible for their parents’ behaviour.

TheHaplessWit · 22/02/2026 14:26
GIF by BuzzFeed

Sarah, Beatrice and Eugenie - I only ever see the Featheringtons - desperate to cling on to the aristocracy.

Soontobe60 · 22/02/2026 14:29

Viviennemary · 22/02/2026 09:56

They are a pair of grifters. Everything they have is because of their royal position. Without it they would be nothing.

Everything anyone has is generally as a result of their family you numpty!

Dollymylove · 22/02/2026 14:31

DrCalLightman · 22/02/2026 13:49

But would she have got there if not surrounded by privilege and the best money can (and can't) buy?

Maybe? Maybe not.

She would have got nowhere, money or not, if she didnt have the talent

x2boys · 22/02/2026 14:33

Dollymylove · 22/02/2026 14:31

She would have got nowhere, money or not, if she didnt have the talent

Indeed
But money and contacts still help enormously.even with talent.