PR disasters thread 4

[AtIusvue]

One stop shop for all As ever, Archewell, Meg n Harry disasters

It makes sense to keep the posts in the thread specifically about it.

Hope the situation gets cleaned up.

Edited typo.

Either they are so stupid they don’t see the problem with it or they are so desperate they’ll latch onto anything and this was easy pickings. 🤷‍♀️

Also why is she wearing that trenchcoat for the publicity event? I have one very similar from Hobbs although mine is a deep green. I wear it when it’s raining and not too cold. Meanwhile Harry is his usual scruffy self - maybe he just got off the plane back from the UK. Mind it would have been even more inappropriate if she’d been wearing a strapless ball gown 😉😂

You are right, she hasn't.

Where can we watch it? I like things like this, exposing what is basically a MLM.

H&M have leached off billionaire friends to access a billionaire lifestyle that is beyond their mere millionaire means, such as using Tyler Perry's California house or Bill Guthy & Victoria Jackson's New York residence and their private jet.

It will be interesting to see how they cope as their billionaire friends relocate from California to avoid the proposed billionaire tax. Several billionaires (Larry Page, David Sachs, Peter Thiel and more) are not waiting to see if the billionaire tax passes but have already departed with their billions. Rumours are flying that Oprah may move permanently to Hawaii.

How will H&M borrow private jets to attend various events when the owner no longer lets it land in California to avoid California tax authorities arguing that the jet's time in California establishes residency for tax purposes?

Is this thread about PR disasters specifically for H & M as it doesn’t state this on thread title. Oops sorry obviously the rest of the royals don’t have any PR disasters as they are whiter than white 😳

OMG what an absolute doughnut!!

This is number 4 in a series that are about Sussex pr , this is the only one without their name, I’m assuming that op didn’t feel it necessary as we all know what it’s about.

Well you might know what it is about but not all posters are regulars. Seeing as this is the RF section it would seem logical that posters would contribute about any PR disasters.

Regular posters did know from either end of the debate! , they have contributed previously, no new posters have appeared.

@AtIusvue, perhaps you need to ask mn to edit the title as it’s apparently confusing posters that number 4 in a series hasn’t got the full title?
I know you linked at the beginning to the previous thread and explained in the opening post but obviously some posters don’t read from the beginning and just jump in .

Good idea @jeffgoldblum - I was thinking we should change for the next thread, but it's still early in this one.

Yes 👍 , I admit I’m preoccupied with the case ( as are you) so haven’t been taking interest at the moment.

I knew that GG cookies were a big thing in the US and I would be interested to watch the film.

But, knowing what I know about the competitiveness, I'm not sure a "cute" film about the topic is possible. I agree with pps that MM has, once again, not chosen her words carefully enough. That or just not actually watched the film. Or, worse, has watched it but completely misinterpreted the message.

And I'm wondering what they will put out over the next few days to try and counter the incredibly unflattering descriptions in the press about H's trial.

Just read ?

Sorry didn’t know that new posters aren’t allowed to “appear” or “jump in” to this thread and it was only allowed for the “regulars”. Didn’t realise that some people were so territorial about a thread.

Meghan's hair extensions showing - now that's a PR disaster 😂

i don’t know what procedure she has had but she looks different and not in a good way .

It was never going to be any different.

It’s literally in the first and only line of the original post. I know posters don’t bother to read the full thread but surely the first and only line of the OP isn’t too much to ask.

It looks like brow lift scars, extensions are not positioned around the forehead hairline.

Selfies with fans!

She’s a hugger!

I’ve apologised and taken myself elsewhere. But I do have to point out that thread policing is usually frowned on on Mumsnet. Signed “Some posters.”

Where is that in the talk guidelines?

Obviously talk guidelines don’t apply to the royalists they are above the law.