Fergie Epstein email

[elprup]

Yet more damaging revelations for the Yorks. How did the Daily Mail manage to get hold of the email I wonder?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15118055/Fergie-Epstein-lies-exposed-bombshell-email-Andrew.html

Well exactly. And why would he need to? She’s perfectly capable of destroying herself.

What? I didn't ask you to!
I only said I had actually apologised for bringing harry up within this conversation, that is all
No need to be arsey!

How convenient. Given he can't dispute this

The inference from you was that I should ignore your Harry post because you apologised for bringing him up several times earlier in the thread (despite you bringing him up again after your apology which was the post I replied to). I will speak to you the way you speak to me, if that’s “arsey” then that’s on you.

Oh my! Sorry I've upset you so much. No idea why

Nope not upset at all, just replying in kind.

Glad you're not upset
I don't like people being upset

How could a convicted paedophile destroy her? It won't be by telling lies so she must be scared he'd tell the truth about her or Andrew. He is the father of her children so maybe that's what she means by protecting her children.

For someone who is a chronic hanger on not a member of the royal family old Ferg seems to go through a spokesperson or two.

That response about the email was very vague other than to say that Jeffery Epistine was a nasty person (and who'd have thought that of a convicted pedophile) and wasn't there something about him threatening to sue her for libel, but how would that work. The man was convinced of one of the worst crimes imaginable. What can someone say about him that's worse than that. And anyway he's dead now so just say what he was "threatening". The fact that she won't and then still accepted a loan from him means it's all bollocks imo.

Yep, possibly her fear may have been that Epstein might make some accusations about her or Andrew was her concern, even if it was just about the money “loans”.

However, Epstein had said nothing about any of his friends or connections at that point and in fact never did.

But then why would Sarah Ferguson reel off those scathing personal attacks on Epstein in the interview then if she was frightened about possible retribution! Surely it would have been better to do a quiet declaration of misjudgement to the media, followed by total distancing. Talk about feet first, think later. It’s probably a case of all done “on the fly” at that minute without a moment’s thought for the next minute. One minute he’s her friend, then her worst enemy, then her friend again, but a friend she’s frightened of. Either her advice was terrible, or she took none.

The ‘Hannibal Lecter’ threat. I rolled my eyes.

“People don’t understand how terrible Epstein was.“

um yes we do. does Sarah?

Surely it would have been better to do a quiet declaration of misjudgement to the media, followed by total distancing

Because every time she fucks up, she uses this over the top emotive language apologising.
It's never 'a mistake' . It's a gigantic .mistake
It's never 'a friend', it's a supreme friend
It's 'hellacious'

My goodness this Australian article has it absolutely spot on. How it's written is hilarious but nail on head hit in more ways than one

living like Marie Antoniette’s spendthrift older sister regularly landing her in hotter water than Bezzelebub’s hot tub.

The Duchess of York has just become a velvet-headbanded Chernobyl

Andrew Lownie in an interview insists that it wasn't £15k borrowed from Epstein for her debts but £2million. And the Andrew/Epstein walk in Central Park was to beg for more money from JE as Sarah was on the verge of bankruptcy. No wonder Sarah stays close to her ex husband, that walk cost Andrew everything

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/shock-new-allegation-about-jeffrey-epsteins-payment-to-duchess-of-york/news-story/764dc481e1c4477f0cfbd915f0be0ad3

That makes more sense @jumpingthehighjump

Slightly O/T but Ferg was seen leaving RL(!) yesterday being driven (!) by a smartly dressed driver.

I know we already knew it but she really has more neck than a giraffe.

more neck than a giraffe..

love that 😂😂

How about that Tyler Perry?

@BemusedAmerican the dates for Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew’s friendship with Epstein that we are concerned with here came after Epstein had already been convicted for solicitation for prostitution of a minor. And served an 18 months prison term.

“Tyler Perry is being sued by Derek Dixon for $260 million over allegations of sexual harassment, assault, retaliation and more” and has denied allegations. -is how it stands as of now. And the allegations were only made last year, I think.

You can work it out from here.

@jumpingthehighjump yes the flowery, OTT language. A general “excitable” character trait or manipulation?

Similarly, I read in The Telegraph today re. Mandelsson …

“In a message sent after it emerged Epstein was facing charges for child sex crimes, he urged the disgraced financier to “fight for early release”. He also said: “Your friends stay with you and love you.”

“Stay with you and love you”? 😯

(But I’m wasn’t a fan of Mandelsson, always a very strange politician)

Yes, it is a disgusting comparison, just nasty. How is that level of hate justified.
Harry is probably the favourite outside of the UK.

If Fergie or Andrew thinks all this is going away any time soon they have another think coming

Virginia Guiffre's memoir is being published in less than a month and it is thought to be explosive. She completed it in April this year before she committed suicide and wanted it published after her death

No wonder Sarah stays close to her ex husband, that walk cost Andrew everything

Pity he was so stupid as to do it!

Sorry, "honourable".

My personal belief is that SF is being, as usual, economical with the truth, and the biggest economy I think is that Epstein only lent her 15 grand. She had debts of millions, he would have handed out more to keep her and Andrew sweet. I reckon she probably got at least 100g out of him. No proof, just a feeling!

Andrew Lownie says in his book it was £2 million, not £15k so it’s quite widely known now that it was much more than she claimed.

Yes, it looks like it’s just going to get worse for them.