I don’t think that’s true. They were all protected by the men in grey suits! Some, like Andrew, protected rather too much!
And yes Harry has shown us who he is, faults and all, which is more you can say about the rest of them!
I think the public responded well to Harry because he behaved in a more spontaneous way than most of the RF and let toddlers jump all over him and steal from his bag of sweetcorn etc. There was something unstuffy about him.
What he said in Spare was no more harmful than anything Prince Charles said in his Dimblebore book; but the way it has been spun in the press you’d think he’d written Mein Kampf or something! Royal commentators and journalists have also found trashing H & M extremely lucrative!
His family don’t have to say any words in public about him because they have a lot of influence and many paid and unpaid lackeys to do that for them; eg allies like Jeremy Clarkson and Piers Morgan, tame royal correspondents, obsequious historians holding out for honours, and current or ex staff who are willing to leak stories at strategic moments, who will be given a job or a grace and favour apartment in return.
And let’s face it, if they are willing to pay £12 million to protect the reputation of the second in line to the throne, and to potentially cover up alleged illegal behaviour, they are probably not going to hold back spending cash in order to discredit someone who challenged the status quo and perhaps asked some uncomfortable questions?
As for the twerking; I choose to interpret that as the harmless bit of fun and stress reliever it was rather than judge someone for a bit of dancing that mimicked an on-line trend!