Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following

546 replies

tataler · 11/07/2025 09:17

I’m somewhat fascinated by the instagram following of Kate’s former stylist and personal assistant of 15 years.

Understandable to monitor fashion blogs like whatmeghanwore but what’s the interest in Heather Dorak or Daniel Martin?

She even followed Meghan and asever before hastily unfollowing - why hide now?

Perhaps part of her new luxury fashion consultancy is keeping tabs on in-laws friends and associates.

Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following
Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following
OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
tataler · 11/07/2025 11:09

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 11:06

Oh no -I don’t know if we are talking about the same thing here but I hate Meghan’s open coats. They looked awful on her official duties - just like someone who couldn’t be bothered.

Fasten your coat up, woman!

It’s perfectly fine to have hated Meghan’s outfits. My point was the shift in Kate’s overall style.

OP posts:
Not2identifying · 11/07/2025 11:13

Yes, at one point it was a relief to see Kate not wearing a trouser suit and that definitely seemed to be influenced by Meghan.

Keeping an eye = perfectly valid
Visibly keeping an eye = embarrassing

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 11:15

tataler · 11/07/2025 10:55

But Celebitchy has no power. Kate has the tabloids and establishment press like the Times and Telegraph behind her. I wouldn’t be bothered by the likes of that blog tbh

I have no idea of the reach or power or number of subscribers of Celebitchy. (Looking at the usernames, it does seem pretty restricted). I hope for all our sakes that these twisted and vicious people are a tiny minority. It is most certainly the most ridiculous echo chamber I’ve come across.

But it is a hate site, perpetuating the false allegations made by M against Catherine and since C is in line to be Queen, that’s more than just a personal, trivial matter. Fashion choices may not be important, sure, but the anti-British venom on there is very depressing, and based on ignorance and misunderstanding of UK culture.

The cruelty and callousness towards a mother with cancer and her husband who has committed the crime of losing some of his hair has to be read to be believed.

onehorserace · 11/07/2025 11:15

tataler · 11/07/2025 10:52

I let them have that one but it’s interesting that all the watching out for clashes didn’t stop Natasha from styling Kate in Meghan’s exact blue and black Aquazzura’s.

Princess of Wales re-wears £645 Aquazzura heels favoured by Meghan Markle to reopen National Portrait Gallery

Ah the famous pigeon dress !

onehorserace · 11/07/2025 11:17

cheezy · 11/07/2025 10:47

But the optics are terrible are they not? Why not have a private account to do your research? Celebitchy will dine out on this forever more.

Are their people who value anything that is said on that site? 🤷‍♀️

TeenToTwenties · 11/07/2025 11:18

I saw the thread title and thought it was about Archers

tataler · 11/07/2025 11:18

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 11:15

I have no idea of the reach or power or number of subscribers of Celebitchy. (Looking at the usernames, it does seem pretty restricted). I hope for all our sakes that these twisted and vicious people are a tiny minority. It is most certainly the most ridiculous echo chamber I’ve come across.

But it is a hate site, perpetuating the false allegations made by M against Catherine and since C is in line to be Queen, that’s more than just a personal, trivial matter. Fashion choices may not be important, sure, but the anti-British venom on there is very depressing, and based on ignorance and misunderstanding of UK culture.

The cruelty and callousness towards a mother with cancer and her husband who has committed the crime of losing some of his hair has to be read to be believed.

What they write is pretty tame for all the vileness I see about Meghan in the mainstream media.

Kate is fetted every where else. She will be just fine.

OP posts:
Vespanest · 11/07/2025 11:19

These threads both sides are pure stupidity, nearly all outfits can be traced back to Diana, not because Diana was some sort of fashion icon but because that's how style works. Thankfully both Catherine and Meghan wore clothes before 2016 as there is often proof even then there can be cross overs. There is nothing to suggest that the following may have happened when Meghan was still in good terms. Neither of them have invented a fashion style. They both wear clothes.

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 11:20

tataler · 11/07/2025 11:09

It’s perfectly fine to have hated Meghan’s outfits. My point was the shift in Kate’s overall style.

I think this is a genuinely interesting point but I’d argue that Covid and all the societal changes that brought, as well as C’s illness and her re-assessment of what matters in life are just as likely to be factors in a move to increased informality in all kinds of aspects of her style.

I really don’t think C would choose to emulate the very person who tried to destroy her. I know I wouldn’t!

LizzieSiddal · 11/07/2025 11:21

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 10:30

Well no - for the reasons I gave above. I don’t know if you go on Celebitchy, or are otherwise au fait with the fantasies of the Sussex Squad, but that crowd are absolutely OBSESSED with the idea that Catherine copies everything M does - hair, clothes, makeup. If I were this lady I’d see it as part of my job to avoid giving them any fuel.

Agree 100% with this. Whatever M wore/said/did in the recent past needed to be completely avoided by Kate for weeks.

It would be part of this woman’s job to keep tabs on this information.

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 11:22

Not2identifying · 11/07/2025 11:13

Yes, at one point it was a relief to see Kate not wearing a trouser suit and that definitely seemed to be influenced by Meghan.

Keeping an eye = perfectly valid
Visibly keeping an eye = embarrassing

Why is being open embarrassing? I would have thought just the opposite.

BoredZelda · 11/07/2025 11:25

Soonenough · 11/07/2025 10:36

I thought this was about The Archers Radio 4 show 😂 And wondered what it had to do with the Royal Family.

Same.

And now I wish Natasha and Tom had instagram.

tataler · 11/07/2025 11:26

Might have to check out this Archers program 🙂

OP posts:
CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 11:43

tataler · 11/07/2025 11:26

Might have to check out this Archers program 🙂

It can be addictive - you have been warned!

LaMarschallin · 11/07/2025 11:59

And now I wish Natasha and Tom had instagram.

Amber might introduce TA to a whole new online world...
"We got this!" last night immediately made me picture the 💪 emoji.
And made me a bit queasy - haven't taken to Amber yet.

WaitedBlankey · 11/07/2025 12:04

Soonenough · 11/07/2025 10:36

I thought this was about The Archers Radio 4 show 😂 And wondered what it had to do with the Royal Family.

So did I - I was so disappointed that it's just "which not terribly relevant person follows some other not terribly relevant people" gossip.
I was up for so high level Archers snark.

NewAgeNewMe · 11/07/2025 12:16

I’m another who thought why on earth is there a The Archers in RF board 🤣 and I haven’t even listened to it for years. I’ve stopped all soaps as I was wasting too much time on them 🙈

jeffgoldblum · 11/07/2025 12:17

fredscat · 11/07/2025 09:58

I'm confused. what has this got to do with the royal family?

I was about to ask the same question?
op why have you posted this on the royal family topic?

IsItWickedNotToCare · 11/07/2025 12:19

I'm even more confused, I thought we were talking about Natasha Archer from The Archers, not her Instagram would be worth a look 😂🤣

cheezy · 11/07/2025 12:30

jeffgoldblum · 11/07/2025 12:17

I was about to ask the same question?
op why have you posted this on the royal family topic?

Confused Because it’s Catherine, the PoW’s personal assistant?
You know Catherine, aka Kate Middleton, the one who’s married to…oh nevermind.

cheezy · 11/07/2025 12:30

Oh, if you were making a joke about the Archers, sorry Blush

jeffgoldblum · 11/07/2025 12:39

cheezy · 11/07/2025 12:30

Confused Because it’s Catherine, the PoW’s personal assistant?
You know Catherine, aka Kate Middleton, the one who’s married to…oh nevermind.

You mean “ was” her stylist!
she has recently left to start her own business, so she is not going to be “right hand woman to the future queen “

and I fail to see why a previous assistant to the royal family cannot follow whoever she likes on any forum , she was an employee not a slave , they are allowed their own thoughts and opinions.

cheezy · 11/07/2025 12:44

Of course, she can follow whoever she likes, but on a public, professional account it looks really odd to follow people closely associated with MM. People will read into it. Surely you can see that??

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 12:47

cheezy · 11/07/2025 12:44

Of course, she can follow whoever she likes, but on a public, professional account it looks really odd to follow people closely associated with MM. People will read into it. Surely you can see that??

Several pps have explained why they don’t see an issue. What more can we say?

It’s exactly what I’d do in her position, given the circs described above.

i can’t make it any clearer and I see nothing odd there - but then I’m not a conspiracy theorist!🤪

CoffeeCantata · 11/07/2025 12:49

cheezy · 11/07/2025 12:44

Of course, she can follow whoever she likes, but on a public, professional account it looks really odd to follow people closely associated with MM. People will read into it. Surely you can see that??

To repeat myself: it’s very open and professional to do it publicly. She’s got nowt to hide.