Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

H&M Fathers Day video

1000 replies

Bickybics · 16/06/2025 08:48

So they are showing faces now, how long until they are including them in everything, showing them fully.
I feel like this is a bit desperate now. It was their last card to play, the children. They’re trying anything now for attention, what do they have left, showing private videos of them after all the criticism about the Wales children being on display.
One thing about them is they always surprise me.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
elessar · 21/06/2025 09:29

The 80 staff thing must be utter bollocks. But didn’t she make some claim about 80+ crew being around when she was filming WLM? It’s nonsense, there’s absolutely no way a production like that would need a crew that large. I think it’s just pure grandiosity on Meghan’s behalf to make what she’s doing seem far bigger than it is.

AtIusvue · 21/06/2025 09:49

elessar · 21/06/2025 09:29

The 80 staff thing must be utter bollocks. But didn’t she make some claim about 80+ crew being around when she was filming WLM? It’s nonsense, there’s absolutely no way a production like that would need a crew that large. I think it’s just pure grandiosity on Meghan’s behalf to make what she’s doing seem far bigger than it is.

I know nothing about tv filming. But AI/online search says it’s between 5-10 for a cookery show.

So no idea how the hell she gets 80. Unless it’s all assistants to assistants. That’s all coming out her Netflix budget so that’s just wasteful spending and less in her pocket.

Butteredtoast55 · 21/06/2025 10:13

@AtIusvue 'Wasteful spending'? Surely not! From someone who is so careful with money and sure to tell us so?
Really, I do tire of her nonsense and ought to ignore it, but for the terrible mendacity she shows.

slinkiemalinkiey · 21/06/2025 10:17

80 staff of people with Netflix

Mylovelygreendress · 21/06/2025 10:23

AtIusvue · 21/06/2025 09:49

I know nothing about tv filming. But AI/online search says it’s between 5-10 for a cookery show.

So no idea how the hell she gets 80. Unless it’s all assistants to assistants. That’s all coming out her Netflix budget so that’s just wasteful spending and less in her pocket.

Maybe there were 10 but they went off stressed so another 10 brought in and so on 🤷‍♀️

Ohpleeeease · 21/06/2025 10:34

There’s method in (some of) her madness. Previous internet photos of Meghan Markle’s feet were not kind. Unsurprisingly she doesn’t want them seen. There have been a lot of feet photos in recent months which are much more flattering. I suppose she hopes that these will eventually replace the ugly ones.

2024onwardsandup · 21/06/2025 10:58

Where are the feet pics!! I have to see them now and can’t see them on her or severs insta!

2024onwardsandup · 21/06/2025 10:58

Oh I see they’re on the website

looks like she’s about to hang herself

BIZARRE

Thinlyveiled · 21/06/2025 11:01

She seems to have a thing about bare feet. Harry is often photographed with bare feet and so are the children. I think it's to make the point that she is free and easy, a Cali girl who lives with no restrictions and doesn't wear tights. Ever.

FenellaFeldman · 21/06/2025 11:02

Yes, it's the first image. The dirty feet is just maybe a deliberate link to the earth?

smilesy · 21/06/2025 11:07

LaMarschallin · 21/06/2025 08:54

I thought the whole point of the standing-on-a-stool photo was to show her feet being authentically dirty. You know, the whole Earth mother, wandering barefoot in in her fecund garden etc etc
I assumed that's why it concentrated on her heels particularly.
It's been suggested on here that people who aren't H&M fans should go out and touch the grass instead of posting on the internet*, so there's Meghan modelling barefoot grass touching. I'm sure she had an expensive pedicure afterwards to return her tootsies to Cali perfection.

*Just a shame they encourage people to stop posting on the internet by...err...posting on the internet 🤷🏻‍♀️

Edited

Just catching up. I have no idea why my comment about her feet touched such a nerve. It certainly wasn’t bitchy. I said I “thought” her feet were dirty but when I zoomed in it appeared that it was a shadow. So I didn’t actually say her feet “were dirty”. No idea why it was taken as such a personal affront to Meghan. It was what the photo appeared to show. So not a criticism. Although I had forgotten she was sensitive about her feet so maybe this was why there was a disproportionate reaction from a supporter 🤷‍♀️. My feet would certainly be dirty if I posted a photo like that because I never wear shoes inside or outside in the garden in the summer 😆

upinaballoon · 21/06/2025 11:35

Thinlyveiled · 20/06/2025 22:58

I sort of get the feeling that M just loves to post photos of herself and play at some sort of game in which she is acting the part of a princess figure flitting around in white or beige with an empty facile grin on her face. I don’t somehow feel she gives a shit what anyone thinks or even if she’s making any money. She’s just playing at something that makes her feel good. Maybe it helps to ‘elevate’ her out of the reality of her own life. It’s very strange.

Edited

At the time of the engagement a semi-friend of mine said, "She's an actress". I took it to mean she was in a different walk of life from the usual royal brides and I immediately thought to defend her, MM, because Grace Kelly made the transition when I was young. She might not have been hugely happy all the time, but she became, and stayed, Princess Grace of Monaco.

I defended MM for a long time. Looking back at the last few years, I think it's fair to say that she's an actress playing 'role of the moment'.

My2cents1975 · 21/06/2025 12:25

AtIusvue · 21/06/2025 05:32

@elessar @My2cents1975

Im not even sure if she gets much of a percentage. The whole thing is operated by Snow Commerce. I think she might get an upfront fee for licensing or salaried role- so she has no real skin in the game. Prob what 2 million a year or something? Then she will get bonus payments if they meet certain targets or a small slice of the profits, that may increase as the years go on.

The thing is owned by Snow commerce, a fandom merch site.

Very interesting information on Snow Commerce.

Snow has poor customer reviews as reported by media outlets, so is odd that the premium brand positioning of the product in advertising, is then fulfilled by such a sub-standard business partner.

Snow does not seem to be the type of business that does a long-term license deal or offers salaried roles to clients. It is far more likely that M pays to play, i.e. pays upfront for each product run. Snow then uses the money to manufacture and ship the product. Snow then takes its profit and returns whatever profit is left over to M.

From that money, M still needs to pay the marketing, advertising and PR costs. So, an even heavier loss!

TheAutumnCrow · 21/06/2025 13:10

It’s all a bit ‘Marie Antoinette playing at running a toy food shop at Versailles’.

I think Emma Grede made a mistake being involved with this.

TheNeedyKhakiPanda · 21/06/2025 13:20

I wonder how the SS are feeling about all these bare feet, they called The Wales children feral because they were running about with no shoes or socks on.

Uricon2 · 21/06/2025 13:29

I don't think for one moment W&C are in any form of competition with Montecito, but the idea of them cackling evilly "Let slip the puppies of war!" has amused me.

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2025 13:49

smilesy · 21/06/2025 11:07

Just catching up. I have no idea why my comment about her feet touched such a nerve. It certainly wasn’t bitchy. I said I “thought” her feet were dirty but when I zoomed in it appeared that it was a shadow. So I didn’t actually say her feet “were dirty”. No idea why it was taken as such a personal affront to Meghan. It was what the photo appeared to show. So not a criticism. Although I had forgotten she was sensitive about her feet so maybe this was why there was a disproportionate reaction from a supporter 🤷‍♀️. My feet would certainly be dirty if I posted a photo like that because I never wear shoes inside or outside in the garden in the summer 😆

Indoors, maybe - but I'd be surprised if Meghan barefoot much outside - it would ruin the pedi!

I'm sceptical re the stuff she spouts about being a free, barefoot, ripped jeans kind of girl. I don't buy that Meghan is really into the natural world. Her manicured garden in Montecito isn't really the same thing! It just all strikes me as a pose, partly trying to ape the RF and partly to create the right image for her As Ever products. And boy, do the fans swallow it whole!

ShesTheAlbatross · 21/06/2025 14:10

Thinlyveiled · 21/06/2025 11:01

She seems to have a thing about bare feet. Harry is often photographed with bare feet and so are the children. I think it's to make the point that she is free and easy, a Cali girl who lives with no restrictions and doesn't wear tights. Ever.

She talked in the Netflix show about how she met Kate and William when she was barefoot. It was used as an example of the contradiction between her casualness (ripped jeans, barefoot, she hugged them), and their formality/how uptight they are.

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2025 14:30

MrsLeonFarrell · 21/06/2025 08:26

The prices are so inflated for the product you get at the end. It seems really unfair to charge fans so much, only fans or journalists would pay inflated prices for pancake mix.

I agree - it's outrageous, but there's the concept of 'reassuringly expensive'. Whatever generic tat is being sold by As Ever, its OTT packaging is the main point. I think Meghan even made a point of this - patronisingly telling customers they could use the packaging for storing love letters, or for putting wildflowers in on their bedside tables.

From my research on Celebitchy, it's totally working. They LOVE it! They cannot get enough of the boxing (unboxing these products is a major event for them and worth videoing - God help us) and some of them confess to not having much disposable income but claim to be saving up for As Ever products.

It's so nauseating as to be disturbing, really. These people must be very needy and gullible. They have bought right into what Meghan is doing both actually and metaphorically. And all her antics, as discussed above, are calculated to please these fans.

Thinlyveiled · 21/06/2025 14:36

ShesTheAlbatross · 21/06/2025 14:10

She talked in the Netflix show about how she met Kate and William when she was barefoot. It was used as an example of the contradiction between her casualness (ripped jeans, barefoot, she hugged them), and their formality/how uptight they are.

Exactly

MrsLeonFarrell · 21/06/2025 14:38

@CoffeeCantatafirstlyI really don't get the concept of unboxing, whatever is being unbound, I think I'm too old! But secondly, how many people are on Celebitchy? Is it a viable market for a business or only a few hundred people?

JSMill · 21/06/2025 14:40

According to X, she is releasing the wine on July 1st. Does anyone know whose birthday that was? Take a guess 😜.

Butteredtoast55 · 21/06/2025 14:54

ShesTheAlbatross · 21/06/2025 14:10

She talked in the Netflix show about how she met Kate and William when she was barefoot. It was used as an example of the contradiction between her casualness (ripped jeans, barefoot, she hugged them), and their formality/how uptight they are.

I remember that and all the hoo-ha about the dreadful stuffy royals and how uncomfortable it was for Meghan because she hadn't appreciated that the formality extended to behind closed doors (another failure to communicate on Harry's part, if so).
Some people felt that they really wouldn't welcome someone who is practically a stranger hugging them and prancing around barefoot and, at the end of the day, this is the future king and queen. Personally, I don't think it's the breach of formality and protocol that made W&K wary and stand-offish, I just don't think they liked her very much and that's a variable that M can't comprehend.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread