Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Confessions of a Female Flounder part 2

1000 replies

foreverblowingbubbless · 14/05/2025 04:39

I've embarrassed for Meghan saying that her arranging takeaway food on a plate is the same thing as what Figs Heather Hasson has done 😬

OP posts:
Thread gallery
44
NewAgeNewMe · 20/05/2025 20:01

Agreed @Uricon2

it’s just nasty speculation.

HiRen · 20/05/2025 20:42

I'm very far from being a Meghan fan but people need to stop with the whole surrogacy/"prove you gave birth" shit. It's none of anyone's business but the parents'. Those kids are going to have access to the internet one day - it's like Harry/James Hewitt all over again, and it's totally not on 😡

elessar · 20/05/2025 20:44

Uricon2 · 20/05/2025 19:52

@snughugs, I know you've previously posted citing Lady Colin Campbell. I can only speak for myself but would rather have discussion about things that M&H actually say and do, otherwise it's the horrible territory we were in last year with Kate.

Agree, plus for the cohort who think she faked the pregnancies I don’t think any amount of “evidence” would be sufficient. They could post a home video of the live birth and you’d get people saying it’s deep fakes.

I don’t think H&M helped themselves out by all the silly game playing they did over the birth as it fuelled those rumours, but I don’t think there’s anything in it.

FenellaFeldman · 20/05/2025 20:44

I agree, @HiRen . It's a stupid conspiracy. She was definitely pregnant, I wish that would stop.

snughugs · 20/05/2025 20:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

garlicandsapphires · 20/05/2025 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I’ve seen this video before and can’t understand what people can see in it? The bang is the sound of something falling on the floor surely..? Confused It’s such a ridiculous conspiracy and this video does nothing to prove it!

GinnyCat · 20/05/2025 21:03

Judging by the photos, the absence of any mention of her dear husband, and the fact that she’s wishing her (their?) fans a happy anniversary plus the ‘lifetime of stories’ line, which has a very final ring to it, this feels like her soft-launch exit moodboard.

snughugs · 20/05/2025 21:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

smilesy · 20/05/2025 21:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

How many people would have to have been “in” on a conspiracy like this? It would have an effect on the line of succession the UK monarchy, as if the children were not theirs (even surrogates), they would not be able to be in the line of succession. How do you think they would ever keep that a secret? Like all silly conspiracy theories, it falls down when you try and work out the logistics involved. People are seeing and hearing what they want to see when it comes to moving bumps and strange noises it’s easy enough for one person to suggest they see something then everyone does 🙄. I agree that the Sussexes didn’t help themselves with their daft games they insisted on playing with the press over Archie’s birth but to suggest that Meghan didn’t give birth to him is far fetched

typo

snughugs · 20/05/2025 21:40

smilesy · 20/05/2025 21:22

How many people would have to have been “in” on a conspiracy like this? It would have an effect on the line of succession the UK monarchy, as if the children were not theirs (even surrogates), they would not be able to be in the line of succession. How do you think they would ever keep that a secret? Like all silly conspiracy theories, it falls down when you try and work out the logistics involved. People are seeing and hearing what they want to see when it comes to moving bumps and strange noises it’s easy enough for one person to suggest they see something then everyone does 🙄. I agree that the Sussexes didn’t help themselves with their daft games they insisted on playing with the press over Archie’s birth but to suggest that Meghan didn’t give birth to him is far fetched

typo

Edited

Medical Records are private and she’s certainly kept it private. Although the Dr who delivered Lilibet either she or her husband ran a surrogacy clinic which they gave up after Lilibet birth. I think she could easily hoodwink the public. I suppose they’re so down the line of succession it doesn’t matter but the speculation isn’t going away.

garlicandsapphires · 20/05/2025 21:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I can’t see it inflating.

snughugs · 20/05/2025 21:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

FenellaFeldman · 20/05/2025 22:07

I can't see it inflating, either. I'm fairly impressed that she could wear high stilettos so late into pregnancy, and that she can squat down like that, though!

Galdownunder · 20/05/2025 22:12

The bang is the heel of her shoe landing when she rebalances herself. I also can't see any reinflating of her belly. I'm no fan of hers I have zero respect for the woman but I'm not seeing anything wrong here.

Rhaidimiddim · 20/05/2025 22:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

bluegreygreen · 20/05/2025 22:16

I think speculation about personal medical information is just as unacceptable for the Duchess of Sussex as it is for the Princess of Wales.

It is particularly distasteful when it includes speculation about children, and I thought MNet didn't allow that.

There is plenty of material available for critiquing in the Sussexes' own public words and actions.

NewAgeNewMe · 20/05/2025 22:22

Can this awful speculation please stop. This isn’t tattle thank god.

smilesy · 20/05/2025 22:23

snughugs · 20/05/2025 21:40

Medical Records are private and she’s certainly kept it private. Although the Dr who delivered Lilibet either she or her husband ran a surrogacy clinic which they gave up after Lilibet birth. I think she could easily hoodwink the public. I suppose they’re so down the line of succession it doesn’t matter but the speculation isn’t going away.

No. Too many people would have to be in on the secret. It would be impossible to keep. Someone would let it out, even if only by accident. What would be achieved by such a deception? Why are you so keen to believe it? It is so convoluted. The simple explanation is usually the correct one

snughugs · 20/05/2025 22:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

smilesy · 20/05/2025 22:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

But if several other people can’t see it and only you can, who is likely to be mistaken?

snughugs · 20/05/2025 22:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PrettyFlyforaMaiTai · 20/05/2025 22:45

I can see what you see, but I honestly thinks it’s the fold of the coat hiding the bump as she is squatting and then when she stands and straightens up the coat moves and falls straight so that you see the bump again. She also takes a step back, probably trying to regain her balance in those sky heels, so she may have arched her back slightly (obscured by the coat) and it made her bump protrude. It’s an easy mistake to make as the colour of her dress and coat are quite similar in that lighting so you can mix up the garments, making it look like she’s shrinking and expanding.

Vespanest · 20/05/2025 22:59

I don't get what even debating it achieves, the only important thing is two children

BigWillyLittleTodger · 20/05/2025 23:00

You only have to look at Meghan’s face and body during and after her pregnancies that she carried both children, and that’s not an insult by the way! she wasn’t one of those celebrities who only have a neat little bump and then pinged back into their size eight skinny jeans 24 hours after giving birth, it took her quite a long time to get back to her pre pregnancy size. Meghan isn’t a method actress, I don’t see her stuffing her face with pies to fool the Royal Family and the public that she was pregnant!

User14March · 20/05/2025 23:02

smilesy · 20/05/2025 22:23

No. Too many people would have to be in on the secret. It would be impossible to keep. Someone would let it out, even if only by accident. What would be achieved by such a deception? Why are you so keen to believe it? It is so convoluted. The simple explanation is usually the correct one

It’s commonplace for those in her world to use Surrogates & if she wanted or even medically needed to use a surrogate for one child, there’s every reason to keep the info private & tight. No reason to tell anyone in her household etc. Her business.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread