I wrote this on a different thread, but the thread was deleted. We know there's a credibility problem. This podcast could be interesting I suppose. But there are a dime-a-dozen 'women/empowerment' type podcasts. The only reason to listen to one is if the interviewer or the interviewee is fabulous.
Moreover, this credibility crisis extends to everything they do. 'We're leaving the RF, it's outdated, we are making a documentary that will talk about all of it', but actually please make sure you call us the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. In fact, we'll awkwardly insert that into our Netflix show as well- the Sussex bit. I'm fairly certain she wouldn't be able to point to Sussex on a map.
Or, we'll talk about racism at great length, till we won't, and backtrack and call it 'unconscious bias', and say that it's all the media playing it up. In fact when Buckingham Palace reprimanded Susan Hussey, Harry said it was the media making a big deal out of nothing, just a little 'unconscious bias' on her part:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/harry-meghan-back-royal-aide-28904708
This then brings us to the social media thing. So social media is bad for kids say H&M, but it's okay for our kids to be on social media and have a lifelong digital footprint they have no control over....
H&M have run into an institution versus individual problem. The institution always wins. William will hobnob with the great and good, and host State dinners and attend the funeral of the Pope because of who he is. Harry had he stayed in the RF would have attended minor events and been given a front row seat to some of the world's major events. Now he's cast out in Montecito running a small foundation with his wife, that too not very well, with no real global role.