Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan’s show IS something new and different.

974 replies

AtIusvue · 06/03/2025 13:08

So we have it wrong. THIS IS an entirely new format for a cookery/lifestyle show. Because it isn’t a cookery/lifestyle show. This is Netflix first foray into the world of informercials and they are doing it in NF style; meaning a big budget and a slight twist.

So With Love, Meghan is a 5hr advert for As ever and Meghan Sussex. But what makes it different; is it has been disguised as a lifestyle show and there’s no direct sales. It’s the soft sell…..very beige and subtle.

So every recipe and story Meghan shares, is designed around an As ever product. Even conversations with friends are designed to either sell Meghan or a product.

For example. In Ep 8, she makes shortbread with edible flowers. A packet mix of shortbread with edible flowers is now on the As ever website. Now on the show, we don’t see her open the box. But what we do see, is her giving a very quick run through of a basic dough recipe and then tell the viewer they can just use shop bought. The majority of the time isn’t spent in the baking, it’s spent on the decorating with edible flowers.
This is by design. All the baked goods she’s shows you on the programme, she says things like ‘I don’t enjoy baking’, ‘I’ve never made doughnuts before’, ‘ I only learned last week to make focaccia’ ‘I don’t like measuring’
So while viewers who are expecting to watch a cookery show, are flummoxed by someone with such little baking skills teaching us- it’s because it’s an advert and she’s selling the idea that the baking part isn’t important. So when the As ever baked goods mixes appear after the advert goes out, people will want to buy. Because they know that even Meghan doesn’t like baking. That it’s ok to skip that part, and focus on the decorating and gifting part.

This is soft selling infomercials. It’s a Netflix/QVC hybrid. She is directly selling you the idea and lifestyle, but softly selling you the products. You find out what these products are, after the show.

More examples-
Ep 1 where she makes an Epsom salt bath mix (As ever TM pending). The honey and ginger tea she shares with her friend Daniel is on the As ever website. Teapots are also intended to be sold. The raspberry jam that she uses in the cake she bakes (which again, is a very basic mix and she runs through quickly- because we know she wants to sell packets of the stuff) is now available in the website. As is the honey she used for the cake syrup.

So Ep 2, where we see Meghan make kids party bags. Included are kids gardening tools (which is under the As ever TM application) a honey stick (TM application ) and plant pots (TM application)

Everything is for sale. When in Ep. 7 Meghan puts shop bought croissants in a basket and decants jam into little ramekins, a quick look at the TM application confirms that these are all items she intends to sell under As ever.

How does the soft sell look?

Take for example the jam on the show. The label isn’t on the jar, so it’s not directly selling the brand, As ever. But it’s the same jar shape and we know that it’s raspberry because the cake is decorated with fresh raspberries on top, indicating the jam used. Or the crepe are served with the jam and fresh raspberry’s. It’s all very subtle. The raspeberry jam product then drops straight after the show.

The stories she shares are designed to sell too. For example; her memory of her gran making apple butter- she has fruit butters under her TM application.

Even conversations with friends are designed to sell not only Meghan (how wonderful she is) but they are designed to introduce products in the As ever line. So in Ep 5 we see Meghan’s friends Kelly and Abby discuss Meghans love of spicy condiments - these are under the As ever TM application. We also see Abby discuss Meghans love of flowers and how she helped her in her floral business. From the TM application, you can see it is As Ever’s intention to sell fresh flowers and plants. It’s also why we are given floral demonstrations with ‘supermarket’ flowers.

Conversations with her friend Vicky too in Ep 7, about how Meghan loves a polished skin look, while making face masks- again, we see As ever intends to sell non medicated skin products from the TM application.

The show is a practical demonstration of how to use her products, but the products are released after the advert. When you cross ref the TM application items with what was seen on screen, you see clearly that everything is designed for a sale. Crockery, candles,baskets, wrapping paper, jam etc.

Another tell that this is an infomercial hybrid, is the fact that they have said more As ever items will be released seasonally. Why? What’s seasonal about honey and ginger tea and crepe mix that it’s to come out in spring? These are store cupboard items, not seasonal products.
What they actually mean is, when a new advert comes out, new products will be introduced and added to the collection.

This is why all the press reviews for the show mean nothing. NF won’t care that’s it’s ridiculed. We have all just watched the advert they wanted us to watch. What they want is for it to translate into sales for As ever. It really doesn’t matter how much critical acclaim the show gets, as it’s just a vehicle for the products.
Additionally, we know from the TM application that As ever wants to enter the podcast world. So her new podcast will be in furtherance to the brand and selling the products. But again, it will be a soft sell, not direct.

So it IS a completely new style of cooking show. It goes beyond product placement but isn’t direct selling. I think meghan and NF think they have been very clever. At some point everyone will figure out these are just adverts and work out that every recipe, conversation and story, is linked to an item that you can buy on the As ever website straight after the show.

She’s not trying to be Martha Stewart, she wants to be the new Kathy Ireland ……Meghan Sussex. That’s why there’s been a name rebrand. It’s trying to copy the Kathys mega brand (huge in the US, unknown here) but direct selling her own products….but in a 2025 Netflix kinda way.

So the purpose of the informercial was to

1- introduce the name Meghan Sussex. That’s why they’ve included the car crash ticking off Mindy got- because at least it got her new brand name in. It’s the new Kathy Ireland.

2- To sell the new Meghan Sussex image. So throughout each episode, her friends fawn over her and tell her how amazing she is at everything- cooking, hosting, flower arrange etc.

3- To soft sell the lifestyle wirh generic, no label products first, then find out what the As ever products are after. I’m sure this is a way to get around not having to list the show as an advertisement. That’s also why the name of the show and her product line are different. So it’s not seen as traditional advertisement.

With her appearance on Drew Barrymore, she’s confirming the new brand name, confirming that she’s this super nice, working mom and that she has products to sell you.

Absolutely shameless and so underhand in my opinion……but it might work.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
57
Mylovelygreendress · 14/03/2025 16:52

If her relationship with the RF is over why does she desperately hang on to her title ?
I can’t answer for others but I find the antics of H and M endlessly entertaining.

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 16:56

Because she a constant liar and bully , who is constantly doing one car crash thing after another!

why do you celebrate and constantly defend a woman you don’t know who has behaved in such a manner?

why do you care so little for the victims of her bullying and lies?

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 16:56

Mylovelygreendress · 14/03/2025 16:52

If her relationship with the RF is over why does she desperately hang on to her title ?
I can’t answer for others but I find the antics of H and M endlessly entertaining.

Because she is her husband's wife.

What I mean with saying that her relationship with the RF is over, is that they will probably never meet again. I genuinely believe this.

I' d like for someone to answer the question asked in the above post honestly.

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:00

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 16:56

Because she a constant liar and bully , who is constantly doing one car crash thing after another!

why do you celebrate and constantly defend a woman you don’t know who has behaved in such a manner?

why do you care so little for the victims of her bullying and lies?

Why would you watch and therefore support the content of someone you think is a bully.?Shouldn't you be trying to cancel them by not supporting and actively ignoring their content? It seems rather intuitive to me.

I do not obviously believe these allegations, but I won't be going back and forth with those who do. So please answer my question, because I am genuinely curious.

IcedPurple · 14/03/2025 17:05

Blatant derail in full swing.

Nobody is obliged to justify their posting record to anyone.

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 17:07

What makes you think I’ve watched any of this crap?
if you read any of my posts you will know I haven’t ever watched any of these clowns rubbish!
I don’t have to ! It’s everywhere ! On my news feeds !
on sm !
I don’t like hypocritical people who do one thing then preach the opposite to those in a less privileged position!
enough for you @LipglossAlly?

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:10

Exactly, my question was directed at those who want to provide an answer to my question.

IcedPurple · 14/03/2025 17:12

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:10

Exactly, my question was directed at those who want to provide an answer to my question.

Your "question" is faux naif and designed to engineer a derail.

It's also extremely boring because the same tactics have been used for years on this forum. Posters are wise to this now.

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 17:15

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:10

Exactly, my question was directed at those who want to provide an answer to my question.

Now you answer my question!
why do you furiously defend the actions of people you don’t know?
people who have lied and bullied others?
so much so that you think that you have the right to question others about their right to post their opinions on a public forum!

glitterturd · 14/03/2025 17:16

@LipglossAlly your name reminds me of the site LipstickAlley which constantly praises MM.

"The Internet's largest African American Forum. Politics, News, Relationships and Celebrity Gossip from an African American perspective. "

It's all swings and roundabouts isn't it?

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:19

Please could you kindly answer my question? Why do you engage with the content of a person that you deem so awful. Why not try to actively ignore or cancel them?

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 17:21

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:19

Please could you kindly answer my question? Why do you engage with the content of a person that you deem so awful. Why not try to actively ignore or cancel them?

I’ve answered you several times now!
please respond in kind to my question now!

IcedPurple · 14/03/2025 17:21

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:19

Please could you kindly answer my question? Why do you engage with the content of a person that you deem so awful. Why not try to actively ignore or cancel them?

Who is your 'question' addressed to? This isn't an interrogation.

You've just appeared on this thread and, out of nowhere, are trying to derail the discussion with completely off topic 'questions'. Nobody owes you an answer. In fact, in the interest of keeping the discussion on topic, they'd be better off ignoring you.

Mylovelygreendress · 14/03/2025 17:23

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 16:56

Because she is her husband's wife.

What I mean with saying that her relationship with the RF is over, is that they will probably never meet again. I genuinely believe this.

I' d like for someone to answer the question asked in the above post honestly.

Edited

Yes we all know that Meghan is Harry’s wife however she is under no obligation to take his name . Thousands of women retain their own names . Given her ( supposedly ) strong feminist views I don’t think anyone would have batted an eyelid if she had kept her own name professionally like Sophie Winkleman ( Lady Windsor). And don’t forget that the Duchess of Kent requested she be called Katherine Kent.
So, the cynic in me thinks she clings on to the title for her own benefit. And why insist on titles for her DC ?

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 17:24

IcedPurple · 14/03/2025 17:21

Who is your 'question' addressed to? This isn't an interrogation.

You've just appeared on this thread and, out of nowhere, are trying to derail the discussion with completely off topic 'questions'. Nobody owes you an answer. In fact, in the interest of keeping the discussion on topic, they'd be better off ignoring you.

Edited

Yes sorry @IcedPurple, I’ve responded politely several times with an answer for this poster but apparently that isn’t good enough!🤷‍♀️

however I would dearly love an answer to my question.

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:24

You can if you want. This question was just born out of genuine curiosity. You can either choose to reply or not.

SpreadingJammyTodgerLove · 14/03/2025 17:24

Quite right @IcedPurple . Nobody needs to justify why, what and how much they post about the highly divisive, highly mendacious public and political figure that is Meghan Markle.

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 17:27

SpreadingJammyTodgerLove · 14/03/2025 17:24

Quite right @IcedPurple . Nobody needs to justify why, what and how much they post about the highly divisive, highly mendacious public and political figure that is Meghan Markle.

You’ve forgotten liar and bully jammy!

glitterturd · 14/03/2025 17:28

After all that Meghan's show is still being criticised while disappearing down the drain fast.

BelfastBug · 14/03/2025 17:29

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:00

Why would you watch and therefore support the content of someone you think is a bully.?Shouldn't you be trying to cancel them by not supporting and actively ignoring their content? It seems rather intuitive to me.

I do not obviously believe these allegations, but I won't be going back and forth with those who do. So please answer my question, because I am genuinely curious.

Edited

I do not obviously believe these allegations, but I won't be going back and forth with those who do. So please answer my question, because I am genuinely curious.

Well you are out there all alone in your denial because the extensive and rigorous legal counsels of:

The Times newspaper,
Headline Publishing Group (for Courtiers book),
Vanity Fair,
The Hollywood Reporter,
Access Hollywood,

each approved the publishing of reports from their separate investigations into the appalling bullying behavior of Meghan Markle where staff were harassed and belittled, some hounded from their jobs and others resorting to seeking professional support to alleviate the mental distress she caused them whilst working for her. This went on for years - experienced and witnessed by staff on both sides of the Atlantic - one confirming that they were a current and senior staffer for MM.

The legal approval would have considered all the evidence to ensure these allegations were watertight against any legal come back from this highly litigious individual. To date silence from MM each and every time another investiagtion is published.

Why would you dismiss wholesale the individual testimonies of these people who have suffered - is it such an inconvenient truth for you?

Its no surprise to others who have witnessed her other interpersonal relationships collapse around her - ex partners, parents, siblings, in-laws, colleagues, friends. MM is the common denominator. This is who she is.

BelfastBug · 14/03/2025 17:35

P.S I dont watch or engage in any content that will financially benefit the 'f**king, bullying, grifter' that is MM.

jeffgoldblum · 14/03/2025 17:37

BelfastBug · 14/03/2025 17:35

P.S I dont watch or engage in any content that will financially benefit the 'f**king, bullying, grifter' that is MM.

I know @BelfastBug! , the issue now is trying not to engage with it!!!
contantly being thrusted in your face !
was even subjected to a bloody clip of her show on breakfast tv.

LipglossAlly · 14/03/2025 17:39

Anyway, If you want to continue to engage in this negativity, for a person that lives an ocean away from you and whose relationship with the UK and the RF is almost non- existent, It is your choice.

At the end of the day we all have free will with regards to how much mental space and energy we want to allocate to what.

I would add that for a cooking show, Meghan did and is doing really well. I am sure her products definitely have a market.

Again for the life of me, I will never understand why people wouldn't just ignore and actively try to cancel celebrities that they claim to despise.

SpreadingJammyTodgerLove · 14/03/2025 17:43

We don't need your permission or understanding to talk about a public and political liar and bully (cheers for the reminder @jeffgoldblum ).

IcedPurple · 14/03/2025 17:45

Anyway, If you want to continue to engage in this negativity, for a person that lives an ocean away from you and whose relationship with the UK and the RF is almost non- existent, It is your choice.

Who else's choice would it be?

Do you think people are hanging around waiting for your permission to post about a public figure?