As ever#4 - As usual

[Words]

New thread!

Do you have a link?

You want me to search the Andrew threads from the last 8 years, comb through thousands of posts to bring you an example?
Sorry, no. I have a life 🤣

Disbelieve me if you want. No odds to me. I'm just saying that has been the case here and there over the years

I have never seen anyone “vehemently “ defend the odious Andrew, unless you mean posters who have pointed out that calling him a pedo is innacurate. That is hardly a “vehement” defence. But thanks for popping up with that 🙄

Nor me. Not one.

@BustingBaoBun - first you said:

Andrew. Has there ever been anyone on MN who would defend him?
Yes, vehemently at times

And then you said:

Whilst that's not outright defence of A, it's clear what is meant...he doesn't deserve what's happened to him. Quite subtle really

Which is it?

Well. I've often contributed to the Andrew threads, but have stopped because it's boring - we all agree. Shame no thread springs to mind for you, because I would have been interested. Never mind

I am not referring to the paedo insult, and I've called that out when it's posted so I'm not 'popping up' with that. Strange thing to say.

Yes, it is strange.

I cannot search through all the Andrew threads or posts within the RF board there's been! I'm sure you understand that? As I say, disbelieve me if you want, no problem

Needless to say, many a time posters have said...I can't believe Andrew is being defended on here

Gotcha! Ok. Vehemently too strong

Persistently, then. Hope that's ok with you

I've never once seen Andrew defended, and I've contributed to many such threads, agreeing with all the posters.
No defence.
The current one seems par for the course.

What is?
Someone posting with a different opinion on something?

No. That there should be threads with a vehement defence of Andrew. I wish I'd seen such threads, I would have challenged that sort of thing.

As I've said more than once, you are quite at liberty to think I am making something up
I know what I've seen in the past.
You disagree with me
Vive la difference

Imagine vehemently defending that ghastly man! If anyone sees such a thread, please @ me.
Shame I missed them, I'd have had plenty to say.

Not whole threads! I didn't say that. Of course that isn't the case! I said posts and have used the word persistent instead of vehement

Again. Not whole threads, I did NOT say that

Arghhhhhhhhhh

No, if anyone sees such a thread which contains the vehement defence of that hideous man, let me know.

Cameron Diaz and her business partner claim they spent almost 3 years learning about wine production, grapes etc after they had the idea to launch an organic wine. They eventually launched during covid. It is a niche brand but very successful. They work with several organic wine growers throughout Europe.

They have very contemporary branding, cool label, and an easy to navigate website. Apparently they have now become the No. 1 brand in Organic wine in the US.

https://drinkavaline.com

Let's not give any space to Andrew.

Slowly catching up and read the post talking about the Kardashians, and the fact they make a lot of money, and inferring that H&M would as well.

Meghan has 2.1 million followers

Kourtney Kardashians has 219 million
Kendall Kardashian has 289 million
And Kim has a whopping

357 MILLION followers.

It isn't different worlds, it is different universes.

Has anyone on this particular thread defended Andrew @BustingBaoBun ?
Otherwise I fail to see the point or relevance to this discussion!

Sigh.

Someone asked the question "has there ever been anyone on MN who has defended Andrew?"
I answered them
I hope that's ok with you, free world and all of that. 😂 I am at liberty to answer a question on here!

Who is arguing? That mumsnetter a cuses me of derailing but oh look a whole discussion on bees and bee loving plants has taken place and noone accuses those people of derailing. Just me!

Let's only pick on Spectre...

@RecoIIectionsMayVary "lets not give any space to Andrew"
I couldn't agree more.👌

Wow! Just shows you.