It's very noticeable (and has been since the Oprah interview) how much Harry has picked up Meghan's word salad tropes and tics, which, broadly, comprise the language of Progressive Identitarianism which enjoyed a brief moment of popularity in the Anglophone world from 2016 - 2022.
Words and phrases around equity, inequity, identity, oppression, marginalisation, colonialism, the urgent need to dismantle structures of patriarchal oppression (although adherents never go so far as to admit what they want to replace these structures WITH, which is alarming to say the least) etc etc. You all know the drill.
Unfortunately, like many people of mediocre intellect who enthusiastically adopted this language as a power play, Harry isn't intelligent enough to realise that at the core of this worldview is neomarxism or actual marxism (filtered through Foucault, Cixous and Butler), according to which Harry, and his unearned privilege, shouldn't actually exist.
If Harry understands what he's saying, then he's basically arguing himself and Meghan out of existence. Class consciousness and material dialectics dictate that a couple who are rich and famous for no other reason than the husband's accident of birth are, by virtue of their very existence, an act of class oppression which should be abolished/dismantled.
Alternatively if Harry doesn't understand what he's saying, then he's just parroting some hollow fine-sounding words to please his wife, and isn't actually interested in 'dismantling structures of oppression'.
So, as a couple, H&M are either hypocrites, or downright liars. Or possibly just really, really substandard in intellect. What a choice!