Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
60
FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:07

BigWillyLittleTodger · 09/02/2025 15:58

I was watching it through as Meghan loves to say, a lens, will upgrade to a prism! 😀

She does love that phrase "through a lens", doesn't she?
Note: That is from her directly.

Iwasexpectingitfrankly732 · 09/02/2025 16:07

FromTheOfficeOfJammyTodger · 09/02/2025 15:57

Also, I query whether she deserves this level of scrutiny? She is not a war criminal or a politician with evil intent. She’s a minor celebrity making a cringey speech at a charity event fhs! I think the level of vitriol aimed at her is out of all proportion to what she has supposedly done. There are a million self reverential celebrities out there! That is literally the world she grew up in!

So why was she having high level talks with big tech and government representatives on online censorship, via the Aspen Institute and the Parent Network? Why did Gavin Newsom stand up in front of a press core and defend Archewell's work and their tardiness in filing their tax returns? Why is she being given a guided tour around burned out houses by the mayor and fire chiefs of California as if she is a visiting grandee? If she is merely a minor celebrity, then why is she afforded all this high level access and influence? And, as she has been afforded this influence, why is she immune to scrutiny when she takes advantage of it? And if she is merely a minor celebrity, who basically lives her life for column inches in the gutter press, then why are you hand-wringing about what is written about her? Surely MM will be delighted she hasn't been forgotten?

Edited

You need to ask the people who
grant her such high level access and influence that question, not me!

But you can’t have it both ways. Either she is a talentless preening upstart or a person with influence and a grandee?

Which is it to be?

The truth is, she is all of those things according to the negative narrative of the day! She literally can’t win!

jeffgoldblum · 09/02/2025 16:08

🙋‍♀️ oh miss please can I try an answer to some of these questions?

I think it’s a legitimate stance to look at the reasons behind why H & M are attracting such a high level of vitriol.

Because of their own actions and behaviour!

Also, I think it’s legitimate to look at whether it is in some people’s interests to separate Harry from Invictus by making such a deliberate fuss and negative noise about H&M , that their support for the charity is compromised, and they are then asked, or volunteer, to step down to avoid further negative press.

Most people don't want to separate Harry from invictus, they do however wish to separate Meghan from it before it's completely derailed into the Meghan show and any benefits to the veterans is gone.

IcedPurple · 09/02/2025 16:09

Iwasexpectingitfrankly732 · 09/02/2025 15:59

Of course you can be interested in several random things at once! You have rather misconstrued what I am saying.

I think it’s a legitimate stance to look at the reasons behind why H & M are attracting such a high level of vitriol.

They would say presumably that they are not making it about them, but are getting the most publicity they can for a very worthwhile cause?

Also, I think it’s legitimate to look at whether it is in some people’s interests to separate Harry from Invictus by making such a deliberate fuss and negative noise about H&M , that their support for the charity is compromised, and they are then asked, or volunteer, to step down to avoid further negative press.

I don’t think it completely out of the bounds of reality to conclude that that is the motivation of some posters here, and that it’s the deliberate motivation of some news broadcasters, and of some members of the establishment.

Also, I don’t think it’s fair to just focus on H & M’s activities without applying the same levels of criticism and scrutiny to the RF as a whole.

Edited

But like you said yourself, Meghan is just a minor celebrity who enjoys talking about herself.

Harry is 5th in line and holds no official role.

They are simply not very important and pose no threat whatsoever to 'the establishment'.

They are, however, wildly entertaining, mainly because of their weird delusions of grandeur.

Serenster · 09/02/2025 16:10

Which is it to be?

There is a third option you didn’t mention - that she is talentless preening upstart with delusions that she is a person of influence and a grandee - and just enough status via her husband’s birth to open the doors to that world?

Mylovelygreendress · 09/02/2025 16:12

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 15:48

Amazing! You can actually think about more than one thing!
Are you checking the prism, though? Always check the prism 😉

Where can I buy a prism ? Amazon ?

OP posts:
smilesy · 09/02/2025 16:13

jeffgoldblum · 09/02/2025 16:00

Obviously @FenellaFeldman , as a self confessed expert on prisims I would be delighted to advise!!! 🤣

Didn’t you once turn into a fly in a movie as well? I bet flies know about prisms 🤪

BigWillyLittleTodger · 09/02/2025 16:14

I don’t think it completely out of the bounds of reality to conclude that that is the motivation of some posters here, and that it’s the deliberate motivation of some news broadcasters, and of some members of the establishment

It’s all a conspiracy folks, the Mumsnet massive are taking them down!

Invictus 2025
Uricon2 · 09/02/2025 16:14

There always seem to be attempts to suggest that anyone at all critical of the Sussexes is "hating" and putting them on the same level as war criminals and it simply isn't true. I watch them with a kind of bemused amusement waiting for the next strange, avoidable misstep and if they get something right, happy to say so.

The IG was something Harry got right for a long time and it's sad that it now seems to be turning into a vehicle for self promotion, largely it appears by Meghan.

I think if Kate turned up to eg Centrepoint and indulged in "impromptu" (!!) gushing introductions and repeated cringey PDAs while clutching William like the last lifebelt on the Titanic, much would be said by many and none of it good.

jeffgoldblum · 09/02/2025 16:14

I did @smilesy because as you know ...... life finds a way!!!

IAmATorturedPoet · 09/02/2025 16:20

They would say presumably that they are not making it about them, but are getting the most publicity they can for a very worthwhile cause?

Well of course they would! The evidence (granted it’s only the first day) very much shows that to not be the case.

Also, I think it’s legitimate to look at whether it is in some people’s interests to separate Harry from Invictus by making such a deliberate fuss and negative noise about H&M , that their support for the charity is compromised, and they are then asked, or volunteer, to step down to avoid further negative press.

It is really the only thing the guy has left that he is supposedly passionate about and his wife seems to be doing her level best to screw that up for him. I’d like to think inadvertently but it’s the only thing left from his previous life so 🤷‍♀️

Ohpleeeease · 09/02/2025 16:20

Harry should be separated from Invictus. IG is a charity established for the public benefit under the law of England and Wales. It doesn’t belong to Harry and never did.

Harry as patron is a figurehead and ambassador but nothing more. He doesn’t have any role in the governance or direction of the charity. The fact that he believes he does is bad news for the IG.

He deserves all the credit he receives for having the idea and getting the right people on board to make it happen but his work is done now.

IcedPurple · 09/02/2025 16:21

Ohpleeeease · 09/02/2025 16:20

Harry should be separated from Invictus. IG is a charity established for the public benefit under the law of England and Wales. It doesn’t belong to Harry and never did.

Harry as patron is a figurehead and ambassador but nothing more. He doesn’t have any role in the governance or direction of the charity. The fact that he believes he does is bad news for the IG.

He deserves all the credit he receives for having the idea and getting the right people on board to make it happen but his work is done now.

He deserves all the credit he receives for having the idea and getting the right people on board to make it happen but his work is done now.

If by 'he' you are referring to Edward Lane Fox then I agree.

FromTheOfficeOfJammyTodger · 09/02/2025 16:21

Iwasexpectingitfrankly732 · 09/02/2025 16:07

You need to ask the people who
grant her such high level access and influence that question, not me!

But you can’t have it both ways. Either she is a talentless preening upstart or a person with influence and a grandee?

Which is it to be?

The truth is, she is all of those things according to the negative narrative of the day! She literally can’t win!

Well no, it's up to you to pick that lane. You are the one giving the lecture to those of us discussing her activities and telling us she's just a minor celebrity, so we should stop talking about her. She actually can be and is both a D-list, talent-free, airhead influencer (who is currently marketing herself as such on Instagram) and someone who has been able to wield an alarming level of political influence through her advantageous marriage and the doors that has opened. And both broad roles that she happily plays out in public, for the public, for the attention, for the influence that gives her, are open to scrutiny.

edited for SPAG

Ohpleeeease · 09/02/2025 16:22

IcedPurple · 09/02/2025 16:21

He deserves all the credit he receives for having the idea and getting the right people on board to make it happen but his work is done now.

If by 'he' you are referring to Edward Lane Fox then I agree.

Yes, I was trying to be generous but…

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:23

Mylovelygreendress · 09/02/2025 16:12

Where can I buy a prism ? Amazon ?

I'm wondering if American Riviera Orchard might sell them, or is that just jam? Actually, is it defunct?

smilesy · 09/02/2025 16:24

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:23

I'm wondering if American Riviera Orchard might sell them, or is that just jam? Actually, is it defunct?

Maybe ARO stands for American Riviera Opticians 🤔

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:26

smilesy · 09/02/2025 16:24

Maybe ARO stands for American Riviera Opticians 🤔

😂

jeffgoldblum · 09/02/2025 16:26

🤣🤣

IdaGlossop · 09/02/2025 16:26

Let's appoint Miss Prism from 'The Importance Of Being Earnest' as Meghan's minder. Perhaps an Edwardian governess can teach her how to behave sensibly for a change.

Mylovelygreendress · 09/02/2025 16:28

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:23

I'm wondering if American Riviera Orchard might sell them, or is that just jam? Actually, is it defunct?

Defunct ??? No , no , no . According to at least one poster last year what we had in March 2024 was a soft launch and early 2025 would be the proper launch.
I am not sure what they meant by early but as we are heading towards the first anniversary of the “ soft” launch , maybe all will be revealed soon …..

OP posts:
FromTheOfficeOfJammyTodger · 09/02/2025 16:28

IdaGlossop · 09/02/2025 16:26

Let's appoint Miss Prism from 'The Importance Of Being Earnest' as Meghan's minder. Perhaps an Edwardian governess can teach her how to behave sensibly for a change.

😂

Altogether now, "A handbag?!"

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:32

Mylovelygreendress · 09/02/2025 16:28

Defunct ??? No , no , no . According to at least one poster last year what we had in March 2024 was a soft launch and early 2025 would be the proper launch.
I am not sure what they meant by early but as we are heading towards the first anniversary of the “ soft” launch , maybe all will be revealed soon …..

I have everything crossed. I did find the initial jam promotion very entertaining, though.

FenellaFeldman · 09/02/2025 16:33

IdaGlossop · 09/02/2025 16:26

Let's appoint Miss Prism from 'The Importance Of Being Earnest' as Meghan's minder. Perhaps an Edwardian governess can teach her how to behave sensibly for a change.

Indeed. Although she accidentally put the baby in the handbag, but we've all made mistakes.

Iwasexpectingitfrankly732 · 09/02/2025 16:34

FromTheOfficeOfJammyTodger · 09/02/2025 16:21

Well no, it's up to you to pick that lane. You are the one giving the lecture to those of us discussing her activities and telling us she's just a minor celebrity, so we should stop talking about her. She actually can be and is both a D-list, talent-free, airhead influencer (who is currently marketing herself as such on Instagram) and someone who has been able to wield an alarming level of political influence through her advantageous marriage and the doors that has opened. And both broad roles that she happily plays out in public, for the public, for the attention, for the influence that gives her, are open to scrutiny.

edited for SPAG

Edited

I’m not lecturing. I’m expressing my opinion which is different to the majority, I am entitled to do that on a public discussion board.

It’s the usual RF supporters who are resorting to sneering “school maam” and “prism” comments and posting silly memes which doesn’t say much for the strength of their arguments.

Apparently, another reason why my opinion is wrong, or I am not allowed to express it, is because one of your number has a qualification in medieval history! 😆
At least that’s a refreshingly new approach ! 😄

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread