Harry v. NGN

[Atlasvue]

Starting a thread for Tuesday.
This BBC article covers the basics. This is the last line ….
’Tuesday really is the beginning of the end. And someone is going to lose - and lose big.’

I have a feeling, that Harry won’t win but he just wants to use the public setting to air his grievances. A therapy session would have worked out much cheaper.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2l00xkgwnyo

The PIs would have acted on instructions by the Sun.

@Choccyscofffy I don't think anything is going to make the disbelievers believe they are too enraged by their hate for Harry rather than face actual facts 😂

It’s a riot, isn’t it? 😂

No they’re not. They are reporting it as Harry taking a settlement instead of going to trial.
see the articles from the BBC and Telegraph listed.

Nice way of avoiding an awkward question.

NGN’s strategy for all these cases has been to proactively settle them. Every last one. Hugh Grant railed about this happening even as he himself settled. Henry railed about it and proudly proclaimed he would be the one who wouldn’t settle, he’d be the one to take them on. Then he too settled.

I think Murdoch and NGN will be delighted, frankly that their strategy has now completely played out successfully.

Who’s enraged by hate?

It’s only the Meghan n Harry’s super fans that use such language

And that was the bit was Harry was aiming to prove in court. But he settled, so he hasn’t.

It’s the same as when someone hires someone to kill someone. Do you think it’s just the killer found to blame or the person who paid him to do the dirty work as well? Think about it…

Yet again a thread is derailed by insults from people who are not posting in good faith.

So boring.

A settlement and apology is effectively admission of guilt.

Well if it’s that simple why aren't they all already in jail then…

It really isn't. Certainly not at the level where Harry was supposedly trying to prove guilt. They've fobbed it off on freelance PI's, and Harry has accepted this.

@Atlasvue back to the same old crap of being super fans if you don't like the opinion of others. What are you then a super fan of the RF?

No, it's not the same.

They are saying that staff they hired participated in unlawful activities. They are not claiming they had any knowledge of those activities. Now that's probably not true, but that is what their statement, which Harry agreed to, has said.

Always the same. They were very quiet when the VF bullying article came out, but now they are back out trying to convince others that Harry backtracking on his word and accepting cash instead, is victory. Just for good measure they also claim others hateful, salty, have a vendetta if they don’t believe the same nonsense.

Do you?

Yes, superfans. Always pop up in the evening too.

@Atlasvue you don't have a monopoly on posting this is a public forum.

By that logic……Harry accepting is an admission that he had no evidence to push forward with the trial and needed to take the cash now because he wouldn’t be able to pay the fees when he lost.

We can all play that game

Did I decry that I did?

Im sure a superfan thread would be really popular, you should start one

I don't need your permission to start a thread.

I would love to see anyone bring Murdoch down. Harry is not the person to do it.

Of course not, but I think you would feel more comfortable with your fellow posters. Posting lots of lovely things about Harry and Meghan 😊

How old are you 12?

Oh my god, five more pages of “I’m rubber, you’re glue” before the thread limit puts us out of our misery – can’t we get back to 90s tabloid jokes and contacting Princess Di by ouija board to see which son is her favourite?