Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

H and M - an American dynasty as an offshoot from the British Royal Family

438 replies

mids2019 · 05/01/2025 06:19

Thinking long term about H and Me lives and their children's lives where is the funding going to come from and is there a serious risk of the funding drying up? I especially think of the children who I would expect would go to a private US school and ultimately will be US citizens perhaps pursuing US jobs. There is huge competition for celebrity status in the US and no nobility as such so how do they for in? Does the link to the RF quickly become an irrelevance ?

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · 08/01/2025 23:06

adriftinadenofvipers · 08/01/2025 21:40

Did Charles know he was a 'friend' of a paedophile? I doubt they were that close friends anyway!

Have you never been friends with someone who turned out to have a dark side that you didn't know about?!

Edited

Yes !
Many years ago DH and I were friends with a couple . The wife died very unexpectedly and the husband was distraught .
To cut a long story short , it turned out he had murdered her for financial reasons but had covered his tracks until her suspicious sister started asking questions.
We ( and others ) were absolutely stunned.

MerryMaker · 09/01/2025 05:31

Charles either knew that Peter Ball was a paedophile - he remained good friends with him after he was cautioned for sexual assault on a boy. Or he is exceedingly stupid and believed lies Ball told him without asking his staff to check out the truth.
Given his previous history as a close friend of Jimmy Saville, you would think he would be more cautious.

"Prince Charles, heir to the throne of Great Britain, has revealed why he kept in touch with a bishop for more than two decades after the clergyman admitted to sexually abusing a young man. The Prince of Wales said he believed former Bishop Peter Ball‘s explanation that Ball had only been caught in an “indiscretion,” according to the prince’s statement to a child sex abuse inquiry.
Charles continued exchanging letters with Ball until 2015, when he was convicted of sexually abusing 18 young men. The Times of London obtained a draft of Charles’ testimony to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). The full statement is due to be published next week.

In 1993 Ball, who had substantial connections to the British establishment, had accepted a caution – a formal alternative to prosecution that is generally used in minor crimes – after admitting to an act of indecent assault against a young man. At that point Ball was forced to resign his position.
After 1993, the pair remained in contact through letters, though according to the BBC, Ball boasted about his connections to the Royal Family. According to the Times, Charles said Ball told him the 1993 caution was for an “indiscretion.”"

time.com/5344240/prince-charles-peter-ball-sex-abuse/

Prince Charles and Bishop of Gloucester Peter Ball - April 1993

Prince Charles to give evidence at Peter Ball abuse inquiry

A written statement from Prince Charles will focus on letters with the disgraced former bishop.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-44888827

MrsFinkelstein · 09/01/2025 09:56
birds bravest warriors GIF by Cartoon Hangover

I see the derailment continues apace from the usual suspects.

Ohpleeeease · 09/01/2025 10:18

And pig wrestling

Thedom · 09/01/2025 10:22
Bored Nick Kyrgios GIF by Tennis TV

Yep. Same, Same, new name.

MerryMaker · 09/01/2025 10:25

Some of you really are quite rude

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 09/01/2025 10:26

When it’s this amount of derailing I generally assume things aren’t going well for the Sussexes.

Thedom · 09/01/2025 10:28

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 09/01/2025 10:26

When it’s this amount of derailing I generally assume things aren’t going well for the Sussexes.

Very good point! the desperation is palpable.

IAmATorturedPoet · 09/01/2025 10:41

Thedom · 09/01/2025 10:28

Very good point! the desperation is palpable.

It really is!

IcedPurple · 09/01/2025 11:03

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 09/01/2025 10:26

When it’s this amount of derailing I generally assume things aren’t going well for the Sussexes.

If only the derailment tactics changed as often as the user names!

Solanumdulcamara · 09/01/2025 12:22

Apparently H&M are holed up watching the fires. Wonder if it has just Dawned on them that wild fires are a risk in that part of the world? Not sure how floating about in luxury dresses in the Californian sunshine will come across now?

EdithWeston · 09/01/2025 14:09

Solanumdulcamara · 09/01/2025 12:22

Apparently H&M are holed up watching the fires. Wonder if it has just Dawned on them that wild fires are a risk in that part of the world? Not sure how floating about in luxury dresses in the Californian sunshine will come across now?

Don't be silly, of course they would know about the fire risk - there's a lot of public information about it, and there were fires in the area last March.

I've just been googling, and wildfires can move at speeds up to 15mph, depending on wind, terrain, and natural/manmade firebreaks. And they are c.60 miles from the fire. Taking out the hyperbolic language of being "holed up watching" then yes I agree it's very likely that they are paying close attention to the movement of the fires, where they would go if the have to evacuate, the state of local traffic, and what they most want to take with the if either an existing fire moves their way or a new one breaks out close by.

CoffeeCantata · 09/01/2025 14:52

MerryMaker · 09/01/2025 10:25

Some of you really are quite rude

Oh come on - we've just got a sense of humour!

MerryMaker · 09/01/2025 14:55

CoffeeCantata · 09/01/2025 14:52

Oh come on - we've just got a sense of humour!

Is that what you call it?

Not2identifying · 09/01/2025 16:36

I can be critical of H & M but I hope that they (and as many Californian residents as possible) can stay in their home. @EdithWeston's description of what Californians have to think about when trying to decide whether or not to flee would be distressing for anyone (and of course those who have lost or already left their homes are already living in a nightmare).

mids2019 · 11/01/2025 08:21

I and M are hugging fire fighters and greeting local mayors. Is this what they want for themselves and their children; a little splinter of royalty for the Americans? I would have thought the average fire fighter would welcome a big from the state governor of President rather then a big from a royal family based half way round the globe?

Maybe this show the role they envision for their family i.e. a mini royalty that can do 'royal' things on a proxy basis for US citizens?

OP posts:
Harassedevictee · 11/01/2025 13:38

Maybe this show the role they envision for their family i.e. a mini royalty that can do 'royal' things on a proxy basis for US citizens?

This is what H has been brought up to do. To him this would be a natural move. I can genuinely believe this was what he was thinking of with the 50% in the RF. Invictus, Sentebale, military events, official events.

In someways this is also what appealed to M. It’s worthy, high profile, and it adds cachet. What she clearly did not want was the drudgery of most royal duties.

If they had just said we want to be part time working royals, only do the bits they fancy for most people that would be fine. The problem was they (M) wanted the prestige events and expected senior royals to defer and do all the drudgery.

The really problematic part was, and still is, the 50% out of the RF. Decades ago the Edinburgh’s showed it didn’t work if it is media based.

The Duke of Gloucester successfully managed it, being an architect. The difference is being an accountant, lawyer, architect etc. are, in media terms, low profile. Harry, Andrew and others made it work with military service.

It’s wanting to work in commercial media that’s the issue. Had M continued as an actress that might have worked. It’s the commercialisation of the Sussex brand that is the issue. The desire to be a celebrity and all that brings is just not comparable with royalty.

lostinthememory · 11/01/2025 14:18

mids2019 · 11/01/2025 08:21

I and M are hugging fire fighters and greeting local mayors. Is this what they want for themselves and their children; a little splinter of royalty for the Americans? I would have thought the average fire fighter would welcome a big from the state governor of President rather then a big from a royal family based half way round the globe?

Maybe this show the role they envision for their family i.e. a mini royalty that can do 'royal' things on a proxy basis for US citizens?

They're not doing it as royals though. They're doing it as famous LA citizens. Much like other actresses (Angelina Jolie for example) are doing.

Solanumdulcamara · 11/01/2025 14:46

I know several people who live around LA. They have all taken in people who have been evacuated. In one case two complete families into their modest house. I wonder if H&M have offered any practical help like that? The areas affected include those occupied by Hollywood people so there must be acquaintances involved.

IcedPurple · 11/01/2025 14:47

lostinthememory · 11/01/2025 14:18

They're not doing it as royals though. They're doing it as famous LA citizens. Much like other actresses (Angelina Jolie for example) are doing.

They don't live in LA.

And what are they famous for?

Mylazycatspyjamas · 11/01/2025 14:49

I wish someone would ask them on camera who they have staying in their home and how many of their children’s toys they have given away .

Patienceinshortsupply · 11/01/2025 15:11

They could have visited a centre somewhere quietly, donated money and been on their way had their need to help been that overwhelming.

Instead, they drive 2 hours with a film crew for a 17 minute visit in front of the media having issued statements from their titled office. Why? They aren't representing the Royal Family, they are private citizens.

Zippedydodah · 11/01/2025 15:17

Also as much as he would not want to admit it, I think Harry will really struggle with the disparity when George, Charlotte and Louis are teenagers and getting lots of public interest and press attention, and his kids are largely irrelevant- unless he and Meghan actively seek to make them celebrity children, which would be a total contradiction from his stated position thus far

@elessar they’ve already registered Lilbet’s Closet as a trademark shortly after her birth, so I wouldn’t put anything past them!

lostinthememory · 11/01/2025 15:19

Patienceinshortsupply · 11/01/2025 15:11

They could have visited a centre somewhere quietly, donated money and been on their way had their need to help been that overwhelming.

Instead, they drive 2 hours with a film crew for a 17 minute visit in front of the media having issued statements from their titled office. Why? They aren't representing the Royal Family, they are private citizens.

They spent the morning doing it privately. The centres aren't near them, owing to them living an hour and a half away from the fires.

lostinthememory · 11/01/2025 15:22

@IcedPurple they live in california, and Meghan is from LA. Meghan was a very famous actress before she married Harry. Harry is, of course, famous by virtue of his birth status

Swipe left for the next trending thread