Except that's not quite what she says. She says her first impression was that it's friendly fire planted by Meghan and gives her reasoning; being that Hollywood Reporter is part of the Penske Media group of publications which are all very friendly to H&M. She has done a lot of research into Penske Media publications and their output, and has observed them run pieces that the British tabloids pick up, following which the Sussex supporters then complain about the latter as part of the continuing narrative that the UK press is hostile.
However, she concludes that it is not a friendly fire piece planted by Meghan because the article is clearly distancing Harry from any bullying claims and making it all about Meghan's terrible behaviour. And she concludes that the piece is Hollywood's way of setting the record straight about her - there's no way this piece would have been able to run without the Hollywood hierarchy's approval, approval from the likes of WME. And at the same time, they are giving Harry a pass. They have picked a side. That's incredibly interesting. What are they up to? That's what she's asking. It's good to ask questions, apply a bit of critical thinking, not take everything at face value, isn't it?
She's a thorough commentator and this is not the first time she has spoken about Penske Media, so she is going to talk through her thought process for her audience. Your being rude about it just highlights your own lack of research and understanding of the background to the matter.
Anyway, for the time being, it's been made clear to Hollywood by its preeminent publication that Meghan Markle is a bully. 12 staff members, past and even present have talked to this reporter. 12 bullied employees. Oh dear.
(Oh, and it's a bit rich to criticise others for wasting their time when you are reading Page Six!)