Why do Harry and Meghan tell porkies that are so easy to prove wrong?

[YaMuvva]

Starting with the porkie that Archie wasn’t gonna be titled. Anyone who understands the Letters Patent would know that as long as the Queen was alive this was never gonna happen. I said this when watching the Oprah interview and I’m pretty appalled they told such an easily provable lie.

Then Harry said that daddy cut his security off. Anyone who knows about RAVEC knows it is independent of the Royal Family and Charles couldn’t do this if he tried. Same with “Only titled people get security” / this was so easy to prove wrong.

And why are there 2 versions of the proposal story. Did they think we wouldn’t notice? Is one a Hollywood version for their American audience?

The same with the ‘how they met’ story - in their engagement interview they said it was a blind date, to Netflix they met on Instagram.

I also was puzzled at her saying she never wore bright colours and that royal women could never wear the same colour as the Queen. It’s just nonsense. See below pictures.

Why do they do this? My theory is that everything they do now is for an American audience who are used to the reality TV narrative of “Some scenes have been created for entertainment” style TV and just accept their narrative as partly fictional, as long as it’s entertaining?

Diligent? Yes.

Remember what@YaMuvva said.

The public are not stupid.

We see things how they are. Despite concentrated efforts to muddy the waters.

Again, why are they not wanting to discuss surf instructors, bodyguards and very, very rich old men?

No, are you 😆😆😆

I agree with you. I’ve worked in the media since leaving Uni so if other that not everyone knows about the anti-pap deal the Royals secured. The thing is Harry can NEVER complain about US paparazzi now so he’s massively shot him self in the foot

I’m not the one who keeps reposting the same thing 🤷‍♀️

People ask and I tell, it's a gossip site remember, you're obviously working yourself up or "getting off " reading those particular replies

Not engaging with the sewer squad members is the best thing for the more sane of us on here I feel. They’re always going to be vile but don’t give them oxygen or your time. It’s not worth it.

'People ask and I tell,'

You certainly do - but as has been shown quite clearly above, what you 'tell' is a load of tedious ordure.

Also not being discussed is Harry's intimate and ongoing "friendship" with a blonde female. News of whom started to spread when it was revealed he was staying in a local hotel.

People and glass houses come to mind.

It's deemed fashionable and/or cultured amongst the UK bien pensant to profess contempt for the tabloids. This is a view accepted unquestioningly from the rich and famous who have their own reasons not to want their hypocrisies exposed, although they clothe this in a pretence of #bekind and anti-bullying.

It's a shame that the bien pensant so unthinkingly digested this stance from the rich and powerful, and doesn't say much for their critical thinking abilities. But I suppose it gives them a warm glow of self-congratulation at dinner parties, which is really what being a bien pensant is all about.

In actual fact the Uk tabloids play a centuries-old role in holding the powerful to account, speaking up for the working and lower middle classes, and puncturing the pretensions and perfidies of celebrities. In the past quarter century they have done an impressive job of self-regulation so that their methods and content is now far, far less intrusive and speculative than their peers in the US, Europe and Australasia.

Societal discourse would be all the poorer without them.

😂

This with bells on !

👏

I don't believe that she had no guidance from the palace, either.

She will have been shown exactly what to do, and when. She just doesn't like being "bossed" about.

@CantDealwithChristmas - can you have your own personal thread with your bon mots?! Brilliant posts.

I heartily agree that no one likes the pompous - and Harry and Meghan epitomise the strutting, self-aggrandising and self-centred behaviour of those that need a pin sticking in them. Additionally, however, they are not just amusingly pompous, but are mean and untruthful and I think most of us can’t bear that this pair continually get away with it.

Not at all. I’m just finding your stuck record rather tedious and wondering why you have nothing else of substance to contribute to the discussion 😊

Oh my! You have a million and one topics running concurrently about duchess Meghan and yet still manage to make more (obsession and derangement come to mind ) one little mention about W an K (or roses and pegs ) then you start getting upset, it's a gossip site let the gossip floooooooow, I guess some people will be triggered by the word flow now 😆

Quite. It’s well worth remembering that the only reason that the world knows anything about Prince Andrew and Epstein is the work of a journalist at The News of the World. And later, it was the Mail who discovered the photo of him with Virginia Giuffre.

But it’s not floooowwwing if you keep
popping up and just saying the same thing We did this yesterday 😊. Anyway pop off back to where you came from now

Yes. And On an even more serious note, it was only because of the brave and unswerving dedication of the Daily Mail that the police corruption and systemic racism in the investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence was exposed. All the broadsheets, including the sainted Grauniad, meekly accepted the official narrative. But the Mail's editor and investigative journalists kept going despite legal threats from the Met and credible death threats from the murderers and their families. And in doing so exposed an enormous injustice and changed the Met Police forever. Good on 'em.

I’m not linking it. I find those papers reprehensible for doing this.

But use Google. Type in Rose Hanbury. and you’ll see her name and picture and scroll just a tiny bit further and you’ll have the links to 2 articles. Type in Rose Hanbury and Camilla and you’ll find more.

Very sly articles. The media know what they are doing when they do this. They are stirring the pot. They did it during the ‘where is Kate’ frenzy too.

As the wife of the former Lord Chamberlain, it is absolutely no surprise that Rose moves in royal circles and would be at same events as Camilla. This isn’t a new thing at all so the ‘Camilla taking her under her wing’ narrative is nonsense. Let’s not forget that Rose was sitting next to Harry at a State Banquet that Meghan was not invited to before they were married.

Mis-captioning the Coronation photo of the page boys in the Daily Mail has led to all sorts of nonsense as well. As PP pointed out, the boy at the football with George is not Oliver.

I believe Camilla and Kate have a good relationship - Camilla specifically requested that Kate shoot her photo for a magazine cover that was in her own home/garden a few years ago. The magazine people were surprised by the request but pleased with the arrangement.

As the wife of the former Lord Chamberlain, it is absolutely no surprise that Rose moves in royal circles and would be at same events as Camilla. This isn’t a new thing at all so the ‘Camilla taking her under her wing’ narrative is nonsense. Let’s not forget that Rose was sitting next to Harry at a State Banquet that Meghan was not invited to before they were married.

Mis-captioning the Coronation photo of the page boys in the Daily Mail has led to all sorts of nonsense as well. As PP pointed out, the boy at the football with George is not Oliver.

I believe Camilla and Kate have a good relationship - Camilla specifically requested that Kate shoot her photo for a magazine cover that was in her own home/garden a few years ago. The magazine people were surprised by the request but pleased with the arrangement.

Oh the irony of flow when people rehash certain subjects and start daily topics about the same person, at every given opportunity, I made one comment and everyone pounces 👁👄👁on me asking me questions so I'm giving answers. Anyway if I'm so irksome block me or skip me cheers, enjoy your day👋

Nah - it's more you're taking bollocks and are called out on your crap. Everything you've claimed, posters have proved to be big fat fibs, yet you're still here, spreading your nasty little lies. Typical SS behaviour.

You have a lot to say but you don’t seem to have addressed what this thread is actually about, the lies of Harry and Meghan, If you want to start a discussion on the press please start your own thread as this thread has been derailed enough.