Why do Harry and Meghan tell porkies that are so easy to prove wrong?

[YaMuvva]

Starting with the porkie that Archie wasn’t gonna be titled. Anyone who understands the Letters Patent would know that as long as the Queen was alive this was never gonna happen. I said this when watching the Oprah interview and I’m pretty appalled they told such an easily provable lie.

Then Harry said that daddy cut his security off. Anyone who knows about RAVEC knows it is independent of the Royal Family and Charles couldn’t do this if he tried. Same with “Only titled people get security” / this was so easy to prove wrong.

And why are there 2 versions of the proposal story. Did they think we wouldn’t notice? Is one a Hollywood version for their American audience?

The same with the ‘how they met’ story - in their engagement interview they said it was a blind date, to Netflix they met on Instagram.

I also was puzzled at her saying she never wore bright colours and that royal women could never wear the same colour as the Queen. It’s just nonsense. See below pictures.

Why do they do this? My theory is that everything they do now is for an American audience who are used to the reality TV narrative of “Some scenes have been created for entertainment” style TV and just accept their narrative as partly fictional, as long as it’s entertaining?

Has the Bouzy bugle call gone out?

🫶👏

I believe that some of the conversations that were had (and I suspect Charles had been talking about what he would do for decades) also centred on Charles’ reign. I think Harry related back to Meghan that it was possible that the Letters Patent would be further amended to exclude his children from being titled in the same way as his brother’s were by Charles. I suspect the only reason it did not happen in the end when Charles became the Monarch was due to the proverbial hitting the fan once Harry and Meghan decided to quit and all that has transpired since.

Crocodile? Not unbelievable. Son said elephant but pronounced it ‘lelfant’. Daughter said flamingo but pronounced it ‘lingo’.

Don't understand the last bit, do you mean you bully people for laughs? It's an art?

Yes you can question my statement, I answered it. Do you have Google? His interview with Gabor Mate received a log of coverage at the time. The one where HE WAS TOLD HE HAS ADHD

You're not invested, not at all. Sadly I am. I'm appalled and intrigued in equal measure. That's how I know it's not healthy. I expect you regulars have strong immunity, but seriously, it's bile.

Credentials?

Narcissist is a trope bandied about and is now so ubiquitous that it has no impact.

Read up on Harry’s achievements in training and coming top of the class. He believed he was thick. His military career showed him he wasn’t.

Haha that made me laugh thanks- especially on a night when I’ve been kept awake by teens and am in despair

I think lots of people like gossip, and H & M give us a lot to work with.

People insulting us aren't any better. You're here to be judgemental and tell us that we suck.

We're judging Harry and Meghan and saying they suck.

You see... You do know why we're here, because you like judging strangers too.

We are all forgetting that the US lawyers that are trying to keep Harry's visa information classified have pointed out in court that " saying something in a book doesn't make it true" .

https://nypost.com/2024/02/24/us-news/prince-harrys-drug-use-claim-in-spare-not-proof-he-took-drugs-lawyer-says-he-may-have-lied-to-sell/

"Spare" may be reclassified as a work of fiction as per a court decision in the near future.

The Sussexes aren’t costing “taxpayers” a farthing.

And since they live in California and have no connection to the UK at all any more (nor are they welcome), that “untold damage” is all in your mind. And it appears that it’s in many others’.

According to news outlets, their latest forays have been massively successful and well received, both in Nigeria and worldwide through the Invictus Games. Only the RF has not supported the British Invictus athletes. And it’s been commented on by many in the world press. The RF might think they’re punishing Harry, but they’re actually punishing the disabled athletes from the UK who take part in Invictus.

I couldn’t give a rat’s ass one way or the other about the Sussexes, but the bullies really get my back up.

When somebody makes a comment and your first instinct is to make a nasty and sarcastic remark, that’s a you problem.
This is an open forum - everyone is welcome.
It takes so little to be kind.
Why can’t you be?

The one about her thinking Andrew was one the Queen’s assistants. Her pals dad. Sure. And the part in Spare about where Harry was when the Queen mum died. The secret wedding three days before. Aye ok.

If the people here raking the Sussexes over the coals and making accusations and being rude and bringing up stuff from years ago, simply said

”I hate Meghan and Harry.”

It would save the rest of us a lot of unnecessary reading.

It’d probably make you feel better to get it off your chests, too.

You should see yourselves from my neutral eyes.

The online bullying on this thread is unbelievable.
I lost my sister to online & in-person bullying — it has consequences.
I’ll sit back and wait for the insults instead of the thoughtful posts about how words hurt.

my first word was supercallifragilisticexpialidocious

my fav porkie was meghan had NO idea about the royal family, who they were, anything about them at all..... until very late in the relationship 😂

Also, the trend for decades has been for British royals to eschew unnecessary titles. So Princess Anne refused a peerage for her husband and, by extension, a Lord / Lady title for her children. And Prince Edward chose not to have his children lumbered with the title Prince / Princess, instead styling them as the children of an Earl, not a Prince. Harry had said he wanted his children to be free of the trappings of royalty, so no one would have anticipated his jealousy of the arrangements for his brother’s children.

Wouldn't it be quicker to list the statements they have made that can be verified?

Crocodile could be „pronounced“ as oco, c(r)oco, cocoday, ocoday, etc.

That’s one statement I actually find rather believable.

Has the Bouzy bugle call gone out?

Oh stop. Not everyone who doesn’t think Meghan and Harry are devils incarnate are part of the Sussex Squad, or have anything to do with Bouzy.

Ooo, this is a new one on me. Who’s the alleged paedo do tell. I’m completely fascinated. I mean, you can’t be talking about the one who allegedly slept with a 17 year old, because that’s not paedophilia, so who are you talking about?

Just because you do not understand my post does not entitle you to insinuate that I am a bully for the laughs.

You stated Harry was ND, then said he said it in an interview and are now saying he was told he had ADHD during an interview. That apparently was not after assessment but allegedly only based on the contents of Spare. The book that we are now being told isn’t entirely accurate because it is problematic visa wise. That is what Google is telling me.

I must have the same scanty version of Google that M had when she alleged she had no idea who H was. Or other members of the RF.

As for ‘you regulars’? How do you come to that conclusion? I have less of a posting history than you have under the names used on this thread.

I am not invested. I am interested.

But just not interested enough to argue with those who continue to insist they are correct when they have made questionable statements.

I haven’t the time, patience or inclination.

I do not, as a rule, engage in direct lengthy conversations with those I regard as foolish either. I disengage.

You may take the lack of response from me going forward as you will.

The only verified one that comes to mind is the grim story about losing his virginity. His lack of concern for the woman involved knowing that the press would inevitably track her down and her privacy would be gone for good speaks volumes.

One of the things I found so unbelievable is when Megan said she didn’t know much about the royal family before marrying and the elaborate curtsies surprised and baffled her.

Come on. Really? Who doesn’t research their in-laws before getting married? Was she short of material? Did nothing come up on Google re the RF?? Any out of millions of videos online show the curtsies and it was bizarre that she suggested she knew nothing about the practices and customs of the RF. Especially as there was photographic evidence that she’d visited Buckingham Palace in her early teenage years too.

Narcissists will always lie to inflate their status and ego. They will be indifferent to anyone that has the audacity to point out the inconsistencies and claim it’s ’their Truth’ you genuinely can’t do anything with these people, apart from create distance. I feel very very sorry for their children, whom have no choice but to endure their childhoods with them (and their lies and toxicity)

I think, at the very least, they're exaggeration prone. That interview Meghan did with The Cut is just astonishing.

I liked them both at first, and respected their decision to leave royal life. My opinion changed though when it became clear they weren't just going off to Canada to live a modest/simple life (the South Park 'privacy world tour' episode nails it 😂). It strikes me that Harry's petulance is because he hasn't been granted free rein; he wanted the benefit (financially) of being HRH without any of the obligation. It was very low of him to spread damaging gossip about his brother knowing William couldn't clap back (I've read the spare in it's entirety).

I think him and Meghan bring out the worst in each other, and they'll continue to trip themselves up for as long as they refuse to take advice from anyone other than sycophants.