William Threatened Tatler and Camilla's niece help plant story

[WhatAreThey]

In the audio, the journo explains what happened when she referred to Kate as being thin.
William rang Tatler and The Daily Mail, arranged lunch with them and his staff to plant stories.
Camilla's niece who works at Tatler helped him twisted the true position to be favourable to William and Kate.

She says no British print media is allowed to say anything negative about Kate or William. The negative stories must be about Harry and Meghan.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5jImF0sAfp/?igsh=MzRraTBxZDViNGRt

This is democracy in 21st century Britain.

Didn't Harry write about that shopping trip in Spare and said she was met with rows of magazines with photos of her on the cover, people then pointed out that Whole Foods don't sell magazines (not sure if that is true or not) and went on to show all the coverage around that time was of Trump.

Yes, also true, Thedom. It was one of the many times that Meghan was sobbing, and inconsolable when Harry found her.

Yes, yet another time they have framed a "victim of invasive media" narrative around their own attempts to court it. It would be laughable if it wasn't so dangerous, because the credence their supporters give to these easily disprovable claims is being used to promote censorship.

This was easy to find, from Spare about that shopping trip (I think). I think she totally messed with his head.

He thinks they chased her to KP's gate, screaming her name?
Goodness.

Yet they didn’t sue for defamation over these “disgusting “ headlines 🤔. How strange

Someone on Twitter posted this , newspaper front pages of that day😁

Totally disproved from the photos in the Mail (this was the same trip, by the way). There’s no-one around her as she walks in the gates. And if she had been being chased by people screaming her name, why wouldn’t she have gone in the guarded entrance, which she would have had to walk past to get to the gate she did enter…?

Perhaps she was having an identity crisis?

Trumped by Trump.

And chased. Screamed at by zombie like people.

And having to hot foot it in a pair of unbroken in wellies.

I can see why there was inconsolable sobbing.

The zombie people made themselves invisible and were silently screaming just as the camera came out.

As well as chasing her at the catastrophic speed of walking pace.

And no chance to change into my pigeon frock.

I’d have been distraught me….

Oh sorry! It was clearly well past my bedtime!!!

So the lies started early. Do neither of them think they'll be found out? It's bizarre.

"allow"

You really think the RF can control the press?

I don’t know if it was before or after her circuitous route to KP that Meghan complained about harassment in Toronto and the Police didn’t help . The Chief of Police is on record denying they didn’t help her .

Evidence??? Because that's a load of crap, frankly.

I get embellishing a story. It is all in the telling.

But to put lies in a book? When there is photographic evidence to the contrary?

Bit daft.

Not even the silent camera shy shambling undead would try that caper.

Yes @RoseAndRose Despite the absolute bucketful of shit thrown at William and Catherine by all the press over much of March; despite the fact that Meghan and Harry constantly make headlines that either detract from the work the RF is doing or cheapen the institution through their actions; despite the press junket Harry did after Spare, spewing the intimate details of his family relationships; despite papers like the spurious affair rumour once again hitting the headline. Despite it all, the RF controls the press. And also the weather. They are that powerful, but not very competent, which is why the negative stories keep coming and it won't stop raining.

allow"

You really think the RF can control the press?

Some people do think that. I think it's a sort of comfort blanket for the Sussex supporters - of course the couple are beyond reproach and their behaviour immaculate, so any adverse press must be due to dark machinations by the RF and press in cahoots, mustn't it?

An accusation oft made, but when asked to provide examples of when this happened, the silence is noticeable.

I don't mean bang to rights proof, rather examples that are really rather likely. I think this has been asked a few times, over various threads, but I don't remember seeing a response.

So what's wrong with that? I don't care whether someone I don't know lives or dies either, because I don't know of their existence. Are you quite ok?

It's just one of those silly tin foil hat things "the royals control the press". Anyone with any modicum of intelligence can work out it's utter nonsense. You have to wonder how some people have absolutely no critical faculties whatsoever. It doesn't seem to matter how much it's challenged with substantial evidence, people cling onto it.

I didn't know Marie Antoinette but I can talk about her. I don't know Rishi Sunak either but I can have an opinion.

What an utterly bizarre thought process you have! You can only discuss people you know? How desperately boring.

And if you have any evidence of Andrew being with minors and the late Queen turning a blind eye, maybe you could share that?

Oh my goodness. Has Harry ever been to Kensington High Street? It's a well heeled place full of supercars where nobody gives a shit about celebs. Does he really think Brits, nay Londoners are going to running screaming after Meghan? We are way too reserved.

Oh yes, @Runnerinthenight - apparently we can't say anything interesting and informative about people we've never met. Which obviously means I have to shred my dissertation on William the Conqueror.

Did it ever occur to you that there might be a reason for that???! Open your eyes!