Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

William Threatened Tatler and Camilla's niece help plant story

840 replies

WhatAreThey · 24/04/2024 12:27

In the audio, the journo explains what happened when she referred to Kate as being thin.
William rang Tatler and The Daily Mail, arranged lunch with them and his staff to plant stories.
Camilla's niece who works at Tatler helped him twisted the true position to be favourable to William and Kate.

She says no British print media is allowed to say anything negative about Kate or William. The negative stories must be about Harry and Meghan.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5jImF0sAfp/?igsh=MzRraTBxZDViNGRt

This is democracy in 21st century Britain.

Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5jImF0sAfp?igsh=MzRraTBxZDViNGRt

OP posts:
Thread gallery
28
MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 28/04/2024 13:13

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:10

Your post certainly didn’t come across as tongue-in-cheek at all, you said you loved Harry and always will, no corresponding cheeky faced emoji, nothing wrong with you loving Harry, though can’t see the appeal myself, just own it, I don’t like Harry one bit, nothing wrong with that either.

Tsk tsk. You're supposed to read posts in the context of what the poster means, not what they actually said.

Inkanta · 28/04/2024 13:21

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:10

Your post certainly didn’t come across as tongue-in-cheek at all, you said you loved Harry and always will, no corresponding cheeky faced emoji, nothing wrong with you loving Harry, though can’t see the appeal myself, just own it, I don’t like Harry one bit, nothing wrong with that either.

I can see how you took me literally but I was tongue in cheek by including smiley faces. I don't actually dislike Harry and I tend to respond on these boards when he gets a good kicking.

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 13:29

Inkanta · 28/04/2024 12:43

Yes that was me tongue in cheek - my response to what I saw as escalating rancour. I go the other extreme and defend Harry and Meghan - not because I am a massive fan as such.

Don’t worry Inkanta most people got it!

It’s perfectly possible not to have strong feelings towards H&M either way, and to not know what or who the SS is, but also to loathe the principle of a woman being vilified over and over again in the press and on sm because, surprise, surprise, being from a different country, racial background and culture, she didn’t see-eye-to-eye with an institution that is imho racist, misogynistic and lacking in transparency.

It’s like vilifying a French man for favouring red wine over beer!

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:31

Inkanta · 28/04/2024 13:21

I can see how you took me literally but I was tongue in cheek by including smiley faces. I don't actually dislike Harry and I tend to respond on these boards when he gets a good kicking.

There was only the heart emoji and your declaration of loving him and always will, no smiley face at all, like I said nothing wrong with that but if you now say you didn’t mean it I will have to take you at your word.

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 13:33

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 13:29

Don’t worry Inkanta most people got it!

It’s perfectly possible not to have strong feelings towards H&M either way, and to not know what or who the SS is, but also to loathe the principle of a woman being vilified over and over again in the press and on sm because, surprise, surprise, being from a different country, racial background and culture, she didn’t see-eye-to-eye with an institution that is imho racist, misogynistic and lacking in transparency.

It’s like vilifying a French man for favouring red wine over beer!

I struggle to believe that you have no idea who or what the SS is. However, I’ve added a link (which doesn’t even scratch the surface
of the lengths that they have gone to but it explains a bit about them).

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/26961997/sussex-squad-trolls-kate-middleton/

Inside the sinister world of Sussex Squad trolls making Kate's life a misery

THEY branded themselves the Sussex Squad, carrying out some of the worst online bullying of the Princess of Wales. And today The Sun can reveal some of the sinister tactics the trolls use against t…

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/26961997/sussex-squad-trolls-kate-middleton/

Inkanta · 28/04/2024 13:34

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:31

There was only the heart emoji and your declaration of loving him and always will, no smiley face at all, like I said nothing wrong with that but if you now say you didn’t mean it I will have to take you at your word.

😊you have a good memory! As I recall I added a heart, and in addition 2-3 smiley faces during my brief time on that thread.

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 13:36

You can’t go on about the hate thrown at the Duchess of Sussex without being informed and knowing about the Sussex Squad and what they get up to.

ArcaneWireless · 28/04/2024 13:37

but also to loathe the principle of a woman being vilified over and over again in the press and on sm because, surprise, surprise, being from a different country, racial background and culture, she didn’t see-eye-to-eye with an institution that is imho racist, misogynistic and lacking in transparency.

I also loathe the principle of not being thought capable of independent thought and disliking the actual actions of two people (not just the one like me) rather than it being put down to race and hatred.

There is no bigger surprise surprise to me as the tired mistaken old argument about why they are disliked being trotted out again and again.

As for emojis pressing a point home? I prefer words.

I’m not 7.

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:41

Funny how their most vocal supporters have never heard of the Sussex squad and have to declare it like a disclaimer.

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 13:52

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:41

Funny how their most vocal supporters have never heard of the Sussex squad and have to declare it like a disclaimer.

I am not quite sure if you are addressing my post or not, but either way, I am not what I would call a vocal supporter, and of course I have heard the name Sussex Squad but I really have no idea or interest in what they are, or what they do, nor do I wish to find out, just like I skip past pages of newspaper stories and on-line content that do not interest me.

So I hope I am not being accused of lying. Thx.

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 13:52

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 13:41

Funny how their most vocal supporters have never heard of the Sussex squad and have to declare it like a disclaimer.

Absolutely, yet they know all about the Duchess of Sussex being vilified on social media? It just doesn’t add up.

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 13:53

And it obviously is of interest, hence their presence on here…..

ArcaneWireless · 28/04/2024 13:56

I wonder about that Devon

It has been all over SM, here on MN and in the press.

It is baffling. As is the willingness to portray themselves as wide eyed ingenues.

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 13:59

Wow. So I am being accused of lying.

And while you address each other and not me directly?

Are we back in the upper sixth? 😀

ArcaneWireless · 28/04/2024 14:01

Again. Reading things that are not there.

Inkanta · 28/04/2024 14:06

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 13:29

Don’t worry Inkanta most people got it!

It’s perfectly possible not to have strong feelings towards H&M either way, and to not know what or who the SS is, but also to loathe the principle of a woman being vilified over and over again in the press and on sm because, surprise, surprise, being from a different country, racial background and culture, she didn’t see-eye-to-eye with an institution that is imho racist, misogynistic and lacking in transparency.

It’s like vilifying a French man for favouring red wine over beer!

Thanks! Yes I don't like to see women like Meghan (or Kate) vilified. The institution is basically a powerful enmeshed family and woe betide if you stick your head above the parapet - expose secrets and not see eye to eye with their rules and not put up with the horrible press. I admire them for getting out.

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 14:10

Please do not put words into my posts that were not there @Remembermetoonewholivedthere you read into my posts what you will though. That is your prerogative.
I will reiterate that the fact that you do not know anything about the SS is impossible not implausible. If you care about the subject of bullying like you have claimed in your previous posts, you should make it your business to inform yourself as much as possible, especially if you are so informed about any misinformation and bullying online regarding the Duchess of Sussex. Or is your interest limited to just one person which would be very odd indeed.

SuziQuinto · 28/04/2024 14:11

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 13:29

Don’t worry Inkanta most people got it!

It’s perfectly possible not to have strong feelings towards H&M either way, and to not know what or who the SS is, but also to loathe the principle of a woman being vilified over and over again in the press and on sm because, surprise, surprise, being from a different country, racial background and culture, she didn’t see-eye-to-eye with an institution that is imho racist, misogynistic and lacking in transparency.

It’s like vilifying a French man for favouring red wine over beer!

No. They left to make money.
Challenging racism, misogyny? She didn't.
Meghan loves the titles and the status! She'd no more challenge that than the late Queen.
She's a royal Duchess, a traditional home maker and literally a trophy wife, admired for her clothes..
That's it.

SuziQuinto · 28/04/2024 14:12

Inkanta · 28/04/2024 14:06

Thanks! Yes I don't like to see women like Meghan (or Kate) vilified. The institution is basically a powerful enmeshed family and woe betide if you stick your head above the parapet - expose secrets and not see eye to eye with their rules and not put up with the horrible press. I admire them for getting out.

Yes, whereas now she's never criticised and gets wonderful press.

Devonisheaven · 28/04/2024 14:12

I admire them for getting out.

Do I really have to post their statement about their ‘progressive new role’ within the institution again?

SuziQuinto · 28/04/2024 14:13

I'd admire them for getting out if they got out and spent the years productively as opposed to constantly complaining.

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 14:19

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 14:10

Please do not put words into my posts that were not there @Remembermetoonewholivedthere you read into my posts what you will though. That is your prerogative.
I will reiterate that the fact that you do not know anything about the SS is impossible not implausible. If you care about the subject of bullying like you have claimed in your previous posts, you should make it your business to inform yourself as much as possible, especially if you are so informed about any misinformation and bullying online regarding the Duchess of Sussex. Or is your interest limited to just one person which would be very odd indeed.

I don’t have to inform myself of anything that I don’t want to thanks, certainly about bullies that I have no interest in.

I cant be bothered to respond further tbh.

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 14:23

How ironic @Remembermetoonewholivedthere

Remembermetoonewholivedthere · 28/04/2024 14:29

MummyJ12 · 28/04/2024 14:23

How ironic @Remembermetoonewholivedthere

Oh please! 🙄

I stand by my previous posts. But It’s impossible to have a reasonable, relatively civilised discussion because everyone is so goady on these threads. Better that I stay away thx! I’ve no patience for it!

Mylovelygreendress · 28/04/2024 14:37

“It’s perfectly possible not to have strong feelings towards H&M either way, and to not know what or who the SS is, but also to loathe the principle of a woman being vilified over and over again in the press and on sm because, surprise, surprise, being from a different country, racial background and culture, she didn’t see-eye-to-eye with an institution that is imho racist, misogynistic and lacking in transparency.”

And yet this supposedly vilified woman and her husband wanted to remain part of that institution and still cling on to the titles given to them by the same institution.