Goodbye dear Harry

[DistinguishedSocialCommentator]

I rarely post about him, never mind starting thread.However, the good news needs to be shared.

Good luck and good bye!!!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13319663/prince-harry-lists-primary-residence-time.html

I didn't. I would be interested to hear which parts/things she said made her come across as unpleasant.

So you've missed the bit where her and hubby sold their souls to the devil by discussing the Royal family on a cheap talk show? Why was it necessary to speak about private family matters knowing they had a captive audience as RF couldn't respond publicly?

Yes, me too - I've watched the Netflix show, what bits was she unpleasant in?

So your stance is "shut up and put up" if you're in a bad situation family wise?
Nice
Why should they?

I thought she was a breath of fresh air when she got engaged to Harry. And fair enough, if you want 'privacy', no problem in leaving the establishment. But to then start doing interviews and Harry writing books disclosing personal family information, kind of makes what they said about privacy look like a pile of crap. It was always a money making exercise.

Well they did want 'privacy' away from the press and public. And they didn't have to 'put up' with anything. They'd removed themselves from the situation?

Reading and watching Harry is rarely neutral, whether you hang off every word (ignoring the inconsistencies) or see him as a cheap kiss and tell and those somewhere in the middle. Harry wanted to remain in the “toxic family”, Harry wanted financial assistance, Harry expected full security, Harry still sees himself as a member of that “toxic” family, Harry is still a monarchist, he still sees himself and his children above others. He just makes his money being the media he hates. We know more of Harry secrets than the tabloid press exposed. I don’t mind Meghan as most of the inaccuracies she has said usually lead back to Harry, the racism, the titles.

It always astounds me how blinkered some people remain regarding Meghan and Harry.

Yes, if they had “escaped” and started a new life in Canada (as per original exit) then good luck to them. In fact at that point I wished them well and swallowed the “privacy” and “intrusive press” line.

But it was not like that . Half-in half-out and Sussex Royal. Supporters always skate over or downright ignore that interlude.

And posters saying we don’t know them? Er, we’ve had interviews, books, official appearances and all sorts. We’ve had trashing of family, including personal attacks, colluding with mouthpieces (Scobie) , pushing into events and elbowing (all on film) and…. above all… The absolute rank greed and hypocrisy.

If all of us English are racists then at least we’re now one less as we’ve got rid of Harry with all his enlightened views

I was referring to where you said "they sold their soul to the devil" by talking about their family.
Which does come across as just put up and shut up, we should just let ourselves be treated like this without putting our side across.

If all of us English are racists then at least we’re now one less as we’ve got rid of Harry with all his enlightened views

Nobody has said that though, anywhere.
Who has said all us English are racists?!

Page 1, now deleted

But why do it on TV and in books ? Why not write to the family members ? Or as so often advocated by MN - go no contact , get on with life , be happy . Why did the world need to know that Catherine was reluctant to share a lipgloss ? That William had an extra sausage ? Why ?

The anti-bullying nonsense Meghan waffled on about in Austin while her supporters - Bouzy, Scobie -attacked a sick Catherine. Scobie using the letter that Charles wrote to Meghan to attack Charles and Catherine. Meghan and Harry never issued a statement condemning the bullying or explaining how Scobie got the letter. She does a lot of talking but doesn't act on her alleged principles.

Just "I saw her and I don't like her."

Well, it's clear what you are insinuating there, but if thats all you’ve got, 🙄!!!!!!!

Plenty of examples if you want to look at her interviews, but the first very noticeable one was on their South Africa tour,

Gave a woe is me interview, ‘no one asked her if she was okay’ its’ not enough to survive, you have to thrive’ , standing in the middle of a S. African Shanty town, i.e. insensitive, unaware, self obsessed. As a self-proclaimed humanitarian shouldn't she have known better than using that visit as a platform for airing her complaints, Lets not forget, she is married into one of the most privileged families in the world and yet the juxtaposition of her location was totally lost on her..

From there on, there are multiple examples, in her own words, to indicate that this was not an exception, but was, in fact, her real character on display. Despite a carefully orchestrated and curated public image, she continues to be unable to camouflage her unpleasant and mean character.

These threads make me lol.

Full of people who profess they can’t wait to ‘get rid’ of PH but can’t stop themselves from posting about them all the time.

If you really don’t want to hear about them ever, stop posting fgs.

I don't want to stop hearing about them. I find them fascinating. Doesn't mean I want them here!

Me too 😁

I’m fascinated by him, from a psychological perspective he a gift that keeps giving, he goes from relationship ending books to cringe tv interviews about love and reunifying. Traveling private jet to talking about sustainability. He views his words as retractable, the “did Meghan call them racist” as if the world is stupid.

😆

Peolle say they find then fascinating lol I say I find them fascinating to be on here.posting about people they don't esnt hear about. I mean you actively have to find this board, it's not like chat or aibu that shows up in active threads as much so they are consciously choosing to come here...some would say it's hypocritical

@GoodAfternoonGoodEveningAndGoodnight I watched the Oprah interview where Meghan clearly conflated and misrepresented several conversations.

Meghan implied there were conversations about her baby’s skin colour and titles.

Harry appeared surprised when Oprah asked about it and clearly said it was one conversation. He subsequently clarified in other interviews it was not racist. He down played it using unconscious bias.

WRT the titles both children had titles from birth and as per the letters patent they became prince and princess when their grandfather became King.

When Omid Scobie had his slip up with inadvertently naming the two RF members who had the conversation both H and M remained deafeningly silent.

These were H & Ms spoken words captured for posterity and their silence spoke volumes about them.

Gosh, aren't there a lot of posters "actively" finding this thread on this board and coming to tell us who and what we should be interested in posting about. You really don't have to, you know! Scroll on by if it bothers you.

They didn't want to escape though, did they? They wanted to royal on their terms. To which the Queen said "Nope!"

And as for Empire, why do they have titles if they detest it so much? Why did they insist that their children be given the titles of Prince and Princess? Princess Anne's children don't have titles.

And I'm sure that Meghan's jam will help to alleviate some of the obscene poverty in the US.

You must never have read anything on the royal family forum. Posters are quite clear about how they formed their opinions of both Harry and Meghans and it is based on their own behavior and words including a an autobiography, interviews, documentary, website.

Nice try though.

I find the posters on this board fascinating. ❤️

And I'm sure that Meghan's jam will help to alleviate some of the obscene poverty in the US.

What 🤣
She's responsible for clearing up the world's poverty now?! 😂