Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

433 replies

GoldThumb · 26/03/2024 06:53

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
OliverTwisted · 26/03/2024 17:29

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

ArcaneWireless · 26/03/2024 17:30

Thank you serenster

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 26/03/2024 17:31

@jeffgoldblum That has always confused me. Surely if you were friends with a member of the British royal family you’d have a fairly good idea who they were. All this ‘I had no idea who he was’ rings very false- which is what started to make people disbelieve everything else she was saying. How could she not know? Especially when she wrote a blog post about Prince William’s wedding?

jeffgoldblum · 26/03/2024 17:33

Well yes @Ratsoffasinkingsauage , it does sound a bit odd!
I mean she posted pics of Kate's wedding, Andrew was there too!

ArcaneWireless · 26/03/2024 17:35

If I recall, H was fairly prominent at W’s wedding.

TheSnowyOwl · 26/03/2024 17:36

I imagine that Andrew has set a precedent that the Royal Family will pay up of accused of sex trafficking and given Harry resides in America, and he has lost the support/protection of his family as well as clearly making some dubious decisions, is easy pickings.

Salemforcuddles · 26/03/2024 17:38

It's not a good look to be in any way attached to this

Serenster · 26/03/2024 17:42

Interesting that Omid Scobie, who has tweeted copiously recently over what’s been going on with Kate, has said precisely nothing about this story. Despite it clearly falling squarely in his royal gossip wheelhouse. Remind me again why people think there’s no link between him and the Sussexes?

Salemforcuddles · 26/03/2024 17:44

Funny that

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 26/03/2024 17:45

@Serenster Almost as if he had a paid agenda.

BemusedAmerican · 26/03/2024 17:45

The filer,who filed in NYC ( shows court on first page of filing) is discussing events from 2022 and 2023. The photos of William on this thread are at least 10 years older. In 2023, William was in NYC for Earthshot. He was only here for a short time and his visits to a fire house, doing a public walkabout, the Million Oyster project, running in Central Park, and Earthshot were highly publicized. No mention of him meeting P. Diddy.

Not sure if he even came to the US in 2022.

musthorse · 26/03/2024 17:46

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 26/03/2024 17:31

@jeffgoldblum That has always confused me. Surely if you were friends with a member of the British royal family you’d have a fairly good idea who they were. All this ‘I had no idea who he was’ rings very false- which is what started to make people disbelieve everything else she was saying. How could she not know? Especially when she wrote a blog post about Prince William’s wedding?

I would hazard at guess that she was lying.

TheSnowyOwl · 26/03/2024 17:48

I also suspect that by being proven to be a liar that Harry hasn’t done his credibility any good so it wouldn’t even take a decent lawyer to pull him apart in court and cast doubt on anything he says.

OliverTwisted · 26/03/2024 17:52

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Ratsoffasinkingsauage · 26/03/2024 18:04

@OliverTwisted Indeed. I think being unable to accurately remember where you were when you found out where you grandmother died is a pretty big indication of either massive drug use or Pinocchio syndrome!

PinkTonic · 26/03/2024 18:06

Roussette · 26/03/2024 16:51

We are on a discussion forum. I discuss. You discuss. I am glad people can read actually, it means that differences of opinion can be expressed without it being labelled as 'jumping in and expanding'.

So glad Harry & Meghan have not commented on the hot potato that is Andrew. Very wise of them.

There you go.... my opinion on a discussion forum. You have yours. I have mine.

I have no issue with anyone having an opinion, or said opinion being different to mine. I’ve no idea where you got that from.

I do have an issue with people saying things and then denying that they said them. So there you go.

musthorse · 26/03/2024 18:11

Who knows but it's just a bit unsavoury having your name mentioned isn't it? I imagine Meghan is a bit disgruntled this overshadowing her jam launch .

OliverTwisted · 26/03/2024 18:14

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Salemforcuddles · 26/03/2024 18:15

Ohhh what did you google?

Roussette · 26/03/2024 18:33

I have no issue with anyone having an opinion, or said opinion being different to mine.

Good to hear. I'm not 'jumping in and expanding' then. I'm giving an opinion on a discussion forum. We agree.

OliverTwisted · 26/03/2024 18:38

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

ArcaneWireless · 26/03/2024 18:40

I too am all for expanding on other posts.

I always find it curious when the pertinent part of a post is studiously ignored though. 🤷🏽‍♀️

Roussette · 26/03/2024 18:41

It depends if you're told you are 'jumping in and expanding, people can read' in an accusatory tone.

Roussette · 26/03/2024 18:41

ArcaneWireless · 26/03/2024 18:40

I too am all for expanding on other posts.

I always find it curious when the pertinent part of a post is studiously ignored though. 🤷🏽‍♀️

What pertinent part?

OliverTwisted · 26/03/2024 18:47

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Swipe left for the next trending thread