Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

433 replies

GoldThumb · 26/03/2024 06:53

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Vespanest · 30/03/2024 11:23

It’s plausible that Harry and/or Meghan have been in the same vicinity, it still means very little. How does a couple who need to make new connections with only a small pool of suitable people make connections. It’s not like they can demand a guest list if invited by a more famous person and they certainly cannot stop being named dropped. I think it’s wise for silence as there is little to deny.

ListoMami · 30/03/2024 11:52

Salemforcuddles · 30/03/2024 11:04

I don't think Meghan would stand for that shit

Nor should she.

Salemforcuddles · 30/03/2024 12:07

Of course not

OhmygodDont · 30/03/2024 18:08

I mean they are very litigation happy so silence on all and any rumours tend to speak for itself.

It’s why the never explain part works. Because once you start batting off everything you find an annoying rumour or lie or whatever people expect a response on everything or assume it’s true.

So one would have to think Harry was indeed at some diddy parties in the last couple of years.

musthorse · 01/04/2024 19:52

Vespanest · 30/03/2024 11:23

It’s plausible that Harry and/or Meghan have been in the same vicinity, it still means very little. How does a couple who need to make new connections with only a small pool of suitable people make connections. It’s not like they can demand a guest list if invited by a more famous person and they certainly cannot stop being named dropped. I think it’s wise for silence as there is little to deny.

Why do you say there is only a small pool of suitable people? I don't understand that.

Vespanest · 02/04/2024 15:11

musthorse · 01/04/2024 19:52

Why do you say there is only a small pool of suitable people? I don't understand that.

They are two rich individuals, who require full time security with no links for Harry and few with Meghan in the area. It’s not like they can pop to Wetherspoons, or baby and toddler group, in an areas that includes Hollywood royalty meeting people to improve commercial and social ventures relies on who you know. As well strangely enough on confidentiality, people who are not going to sell stories or attempt to profit from them. There’s a reason the royal family only have small circles and rely on family for socialising.

ArcaneWireless · 02/04/2024 15:20

As well strangely enough on confidentiality, people who are not going to sell stories or attempt to profit from them.

Is that from the small pool or is that H&M?

Vespanest · 02/04/2024 15:30

ArcaneWireless · 02/04/2024 15:20

As well strangely enough on confidentiality, people who are not going to sell stories or attempt to profit from them.

Is that from the small pool or is that H&M?

Both hence the small pool

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread