Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

[GoldThumb]

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

I think it's saying that people who socialise with Diddy get to meet people like Harry. It's pretty grubby.

That’s how I read it too, it ‘gives access’ to people like Harry.

But just confused why, after mentioning ‘famous athletes, political figures, artists, musicians and international dignitaries’ he’s the only example named?

Not sure what to make of it?

Maybe this is why Harry hasn’t said anything publicly about Andrew. Perhaps he’s been ‘associated’ with such goings on too.

It's grubby but Harry was young and doesn't seem to have done anything wrong here. I'm really not a fan of the Carparkles but this is not really Harry's doing.

Yeah, to be clear, I’m not saying he’s done anything.

But just confused as to why he’s the only one that’s been ‘name checked’, there’s a big group of people that come under ‘famous athletes, political figures, artists, musicians and international dignitaries’. The sentence could have been left at that?

I think he’s been named as he is now a celebrity and no longer under royal protection and there are no consequences. It’s a v good example of why Harry needs to be vv careful with who he associates with as there are people that will take advantage of him. Using private jets etc. he could get himself into lots of trouble unwittingly.

I was just about to come on and say the same, @sashagabadon . Because he's no longer protected by the RF, and is following a celebrity lifestyle, I suspect that some people think he's fair game. The photos look as if they're from a while ago.

It is shit to put Prince Harry specifically, I could understand the just using royal family although that’s not good as well.

It is the problem with all the celebrity favours and smoosing that goes on in Hollywood. Harry is no different to any other famous person and he needs to he quite careful about who he accepts freebies from. This is the main reason why working royals aren’t supposed to take gift baskets or free items from well wishers for personal use. Just look what happened to Prince Andrew! Those free yacht trips aren’t actually free- there is always a quid pro.

A broke royal only has their name to trade on and that can become very compromising.

A broke royal

Neither Andrew or Harry could ever be described as broken. Harry has at least £30mill from his mother plus 20 years of interest and another £10mill reportedly from the late Queen Mother. But your point about being careful who you associate with and that freebies are never free is very very true.

The royalsand those circles have always been at it.

I think it's utterly disgusting that he would have his name in this document. How is this allowed? Not a huge fan of Harry but honestly this is awful. I don't see all the other party attendees listed...of which there are hundreds of celebs that have attended Diddy's parties over the years. I doubt any of them knew about the seedy stuff going on in other parts of his complex...grim

@sashagabadon I think you are right about this, he was really young in that photo, although he does look out of it on either booze or drugs, William looks awkward.

That is probably the only photo of them together, who knows how much he socialised with P.Diddy, or if a friendship evolved and for how long. There were whispers about Sean Combs for years, same as Weinstein, Epstein, R. Kelly and continuing whispers about another billionaire benefactor of his.

It’s written as if those reading would not understand as too stupid what international dignitaries means so there needs to be an example, lets give them Prince Harry. Is he even still classed as a international dignitary

'How is this allowed'? Yes, anyone named in a court document should be contacted beforehand and asked if they would mind terribly...!

Exactly this. He wants a celebrity lifestyle and is trading on his name, with people he might really not know about. He walked away from a whole support and security network.

Why wouldn't it be allowed?

I think it's just a case of the plaintiffs throwing in a famous name to get coverage for the case.

I'm not minimising what P Diddy is alleged to have done. IMO he deserves his karma as questions have been raised about him for decades. His deliberate stoking of the East Coast vs West Coast rap rivalry into an all-out gang war led to the murders of two of hip hop's most important artists of all time. The guy is crooked imo and out only for himself.

But Harry's name has been thrown in there for the PR. Maybe he once attended an industry party that Diddy was hosting or was at. That's probably very common.

But there are much bigger names in the US than Prince Harry

Fraternising with the American mega rich is what caused Andrew’s downfall. I bet Charles and William are watching closely to make sure it is not Harry’s too.
but it is a difficult problem as he a. Needs money and wants a jet set lifestyle b. Won’t listen to advice and / or thinks any advice has an ulterior motive to thwart his plans

Vespanest

Is he even still classed as a international dignitary

But there are much bigger names in the US than Prince Harry

My thought was his name was used because he's very well known but has less money and clout than other big/bigger names and certainly than real international dignitaries.
He's become/made himself (depending on viewpoint) an easier target than many.
Just my opinion.

Not sure about your numbers but take your point about large inheritances . Harry did say that he had wanted to keep his mother’s inheritance for his DC but had to use some of it to set up in the US until deals were set up . He and M have a very expensive lifestyle and although I don’t think he is down to his last dollar , I would be surprised if he is as rich as some people imagine .
The late QM left more to Harry than William as she knew that the latter would inherit the Duchy of Cornwall however I am sure I read that he doesn’t receive that until he is 40 and that the Princess Royal is in charge of it. If I am wrong about that, happy to be corrected.
I do agree that Harry should be careful who he mixes with . We have all seen what happened to Andrew .,

Yeah but they have deeper pockets for suing

Harry's already tied up in a number of course cases

Plus maybe he's the only big name where they have photographic or documentary evidence as opposed to 'hearsay'

either way the way it's phrased in the doc makes me think this is defo an association thing rather than a prince andrew type scandal

Yeah, but how much has he spent?

I know civil court is a different matter but would Prince Harry have been named in a federal case if he had IPP?