Harrys name appears in P Diddy court docs? Why?

[GoldThumb]

I’m seeing this on TwitX this morning.

Prince Harry’s name appears in PDiddys court docs, in relation to his ‘sex trafficking parties’.

From how I’m reading it, it doesn’t appear to actually say Harry attended, but why would his actual name appear? He seems to be the only example mentioned by name?

I’m assuming this court doc is real, I’m very confused by this?

I don't think there are any naked photos of William in Vegas or wherever.

One of the women at the Harry party was threatening to release even more shocking photos a few weeks ago. I'm pretty sure that naked photos of the King's son would be hard to top really.

I don't imagine everyone who has ever met/been at a party with PDiddy is involved and probably easier to get photos of him with high profile people at parties that weren't dodgy. Anyone with a bit of sense wouldn't be allowing photos at parties with trafficked girls. Of course pervs might not have a bit of sense so might not apply.

Well quite Serenster

I wonder if that is just the tip of the iceberg.

There’s may be a rabbit hole waiting.

I suppose you can't count on people having a bit of sense, he doesn't paint a pretty picture does he. I haven't read the book so didn't know some of those things.

It’s already been mentioned upthread but the photos with William & Harry are from the Diana memorial concert afterparty in 2007 - absolutely nothing dodgy about it!

I imagine Harry has been named because he went on to have an actual friendship with Diddy, it seems William did not.

https://thewest.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-gossip/diddy-wants-to-party-with-prince-harry-ng-ya-325462

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/p-diddy-prince-harry-meghan-17047840

This was completely my view also as to why Prince Andrew is the only man in Epstein’s circles to have suffered any real fallout - he’s an outsider to the US circles of power with, crucially, no real clout amongst them. An easy option they can point to and say “look over there, not here”.

Kelly held back a bit there I think. teaandbiscuits… 😁

Royals also famously can’t/ won’t defend themselves. Andrew tried to disastrously and his attempt is now two TV dramas!

The MailOnline is currently running with this.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239279/prince-harry-lawsuit-sean-diddy-combs.html

Lil Rod's lawyers claim guests were drawn to Diddy's alleged sex-trafficking parties because of his 'access to celebrities such as famous athletes, political figures, artist, musicians, and international dignitaries like British Royal, Prince Harry', court documents filed in New York say.

The Lil Rod submission (not the Mail itself) seems to imply that Harry attended at least one P. Diddy party over and above the Diana Concert after-party - unless Lil Rod is seriously suggesting that there were sex-trafficked girls and young women at the Diana event?! I find that hard to believe. (Although who knows what connections P. Diddy made there ...)

The Lil Rod submission was drafted by lawyers, apparently, and isn't just a self-repped flight of the mushroom fairies. If he has further evidence, he can basically name his price. Although it also means he'd better watch his back.

That Las Vegas madam was most aggrieved to have not been mentioned in Spare. She’s sold Harry’s underpants to a club owner who is making a shrine including them. All pretty silly and sordid stuff. Very undignified for a prince of our fair shores. No wonder his supporters need to make up rumours about his brother to deflect.

Actually wasn’t Meghan named as witnesses in the Virginia Guiffre/Maxwell case? Virginia’s lawyers said Meghan could attest truthfully to the character of Prince Andrew, which, considering she thought Andrew was the Queen’s butler, doesn’t sound like much of a useful testimony. It’s very possible the lawyers in the P Diddy case have simply lobbed in Harry’s name to garner similar publicity for their client. Bringing a claim in the US seems to include these sorts of PR stunts.

[Actually wasn’t Meghan named as witnesses in the Virginia Guiffre/Maxwell case? Virginia’s lawyers said Meghan could attest truthfully to the character of Prince Andrew]

I'm still really confused about this!!
Why would they think this to start with?

It’s very possible the lawyers in the P Diddy case have simply lobbed in Harry’s name to garner similar publicity for their client. Bringing a claim in the US seems to include these sorts of PR stunts.

Very possibly. If all they have are the Diana concert photos of Harry and P Diddy in 2007, that's not evidence of anything dodgy at all. It was a photographed event, with many attendees, for charity.

But the legal submission from Lil Rod's lawyers seems to imply more. Might be badly drafted, I suppose. I expect Harry will put a statement out to that effect.

No idea @OliverTwisted !!
It's never been mentioned again!!!
So odd and confusing!

https://www.newsweek.com/meghan-markle-could-testify-prince-andrew-case-virginia-giuffe-lawyer-1662083

From the Newsweek story (Dec 2021):

"She is somebody we can count on to tell the truth," Boies told The Daily Beast.

He added that Meghan Markle was a "close companion to Prince Andrew and therefore probably saw what he did."

The attorney also listed three reasons as to why the former Suits star could be a potential deposition subject.

"One; she is in the U.S. so we have jurisdiction over her. Two; she is somebody who obviously, at least for a period of time, was a close associate of Prince Andrew and hence is in a position to perhaps have seen what he did, and perhaps if not to have seen what he did to have heard people talk about it," he told the outlet.

"Because of her past association with him, she may very well have important knowledge, and will certainly have some knowledge.

"Three; she is somebody who we can count on, to tell the truth. She checks all three boxes," the lawyer added.

It seemed a bit bonkers at the time and it seems a bit bonkers now (on a few levels). It even mentions the Queen and how they won't seek to depose her. So much willy-waving from lawyers.

But it might have persuaded the Queen to settle it, to try and stop the crazy roller-coaster.

I agree with a pp - this is a ploy to get attention on the suit.

A very very irritating one if you’re the Sussexes.

Harry will be worried if he did attend any party’s other than the Diana concert
As we saw ( unfortunately) from his antics in Vegas he is hardly discreet - and easily influenced
I think he enjoyed leveraging his royal status to meet “celebrities “ ( Diana seemed to enjoy this too )

As someone who is entirely happy - nay; often enthusiastic, to criticise Harry - short of direct eyewitness statements from victims who aren’t making a bundle of cash out of it, nothing could make me think he has anything to do with any of “Diddy’s” alleged sex trafficking or assaults. Literally nothing.

This mention of him has just made a civil case hit the front pages though. They must be thrilled with themselves.

There are load of pictures of William alone with Puff Daddy. So should we assume there was something there?

I think they’re referring to the fact that Harry has actually been named in court documents & not just the photos (which are not in the slightest bit dodgy as their provenance is known).

I really don’t understand, why would they want more attention on this suit though? Why do they want it front page news? What am I missing?

With Epstein, Andrew was the lowest ranking player so they threw him under the bus as a distraction away from the others but surely that wouldn’t work here unless Harry is somehow implicated (which I don’t think he is). Without any sort of evidence (photos, recordings, witness testimony etc) it’s not going to serve as much of a distraction from the others for very long so to me is pointless.

Can anyone please explain because I’m not seeing the parallels between this & Andrew’s situation like some of you are saying.

Why please show me where William has a fully documented history of drugs abuse, drunk and out of order, punching photographers, calling his work colleagues **ki, dressing in a Hitler uniform, chasing girls whilst naked and going on US chat shows proclaiming that drugs are part of like getting off his head whilst Meghan was pregnant and now named directly in a court document, that is to do with party's from 2022 onwards nothing to do with the pictures you mentioned 🤔

Harry has spent his entire life having men in black cleaning up after him and gagging orders to keep people quiet. One has to wonder who invited puff daddy anyway. Willian is not named so your point is mute 😂

There’s no suggestion of wrongdoing by Prince Harry. It’s a sensationalist non story from what we know of it.
Out of everyone Diddy (or whatever his name is) associated with, and they print one name?! Well dodge.