Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Have you lost faith/trust in the royal family?

224 replies

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 16/03/2024 20:36

Recent events

AIBU to lose faith and trust in what we get to hear about the royal family?

What would restore your faith in the royal family?

OP posts:
hairbearbunches · 17/03/2024 10:25

Just came on to say it really does my head in that some people hold the Queen in such high esteem and say it's all gone tits up now she's gone. That woman presided over nothing but decline in this country whilst making sure her own nest remained feathered. She meddled in policy to ensure she wasn't detrimentally affected. Christ, the Royal households are even exempt, afaik, from the equality act, minimum wage act, and anything to do with race.

There's a line that always makes me think of them, from Indecent Proposal. Woody Harrelson says to Robert Redford at the end of the film "I always thought you were the better man, but I know now I was wrong. You just had more money."

I wish the 'subjects' of this country would just wake up and see it for what it is instead of cap doffing and kow towing to a bunch of people who truly lucked out. It feels like the juggernaut is finally turning, but it really needs to start doing donuts in the carpark!

Gettingbysomehow · 17/03/2024 10:27

I think its time they all retired to live their own lives. The upper classes are all incredibly toxic.
Charles is ok but I don't like William one little bit, Harry has done a good job of destroying the family and as for Andrew, enough said.
Its time to end it.

Artapplicapplications787 · 17/03/2024 10:27

I think some trust was lost when the late Queen EII had to be dragged kicking and screaming to pay more tax and contribute to some of the post fire renovation costs at Windsor.

And again more recently, a huge loss of trust, when it was found that she had been lobbying for changes in legislation that to hide her private wealth.

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/07/revealed-queen-lobbied-for-change-in-law-to-hide-her-private-wealth

Revealed: Queen lobbied for change in law to hide her private wealth | Queen Elizabeth II | The Guardian

Monarch dispatched private solicitor to secure exemption from transparency law

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/07/revealed-queen-lobbied-for-change-in-law-to-hide-her-private-wealth

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 17/03/2024 10:30

I lost more faith and trust in them when I heard of Charles’ affair and the appalling way they treated Diana. Before then the Queen was always there.

The rest of them I really couldn’t be bothered about.

BigPimpinSpendinCheese · 17/03/2024 10:32

keffie12 · 16/03/2024 21:45

The monarchy finished for me when QEII passed. As it has done for millions of us. Monarchy approval ratings are below 50% for the first time ever.

It's time to end the hereditary monarchy. Times have changed. The Republic website for abolishment of the monarchy sign up no's have gone through the roof since QEII passed.

As for H & M, which have been bought up. They have every right to respond to 8 years of daily relentless racism, nastiness, gossip, and lies.

BK and KP have been the main leakers. W office started in 2019 so they could bury the story of W affair true or otherwise.

H was treated like sh*t by his family even before that. They have every right to respond. They did it up front. Not hiding behind "royal sources"

Before you start on about H this and that, Charles wrote a book with his Ghost writer Jonathon Dimberlby in the early 90s.

He also did a documentary where he was interviewed about his life with Jonathon Dimberlby in 1994.

In this, he spoke about his cold and distance parents, school, and how awful his childhood had been.

It was in June 1994, BTW. On that show, he also admitted his affair with Camilla. Though he said otherwise, the affair had never stopped since before Charles married Diana.

For transparency, Diana was interviewed the year after in 1995.

I've never thought they should be perfect. We are paying for their privileged dysfunction.

The Queen II was a different era, solid and stable. That time has gone, and so should they be.

Yes, I do research through the drowned media soaking of vilification towards The Sussexs

Great post.

Add Andrew into the mix and it becomes embarrassing. I'm glad Harry and Meghan walked away. I have more respect for them for it.

Roussette · 17/03/2024 10:43

Freakinfraser · 17/03/2024 09:41

What? I’m fifty and British. I have mever once been asked to pledge allegiance to the monarchy or go worship them. That’s ridiculous.

Edited

No, but your MP has to swear allegiance to the King. MPs who are representing us, have to

wby don't they swear allegiance to the people, not to someone we didn't choose and. can't vote out

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 17/03/2024 10:44

For me also, I recall speaking to my nana and grandad (both were divorced), grandad served in British army and nana worked in London and met her third DH who was in the army and upper class. Neither of them said anything negative or positive about the royal family including George VI, so this is living through WWII etc. You’d think if anything they’d be royalists/monarchists considering their ages but no.

CoffeeCantata · 17/03/2024 10:45

Haven't read the responses here - deliberately, because I want to give my own unbiased answer. Not being rude.

No, it hasn't changed my view at all. It doesn't have much to do with the royals, and more to do with social media. 90% of the hoo-ha strikes me as being the press and SM making mischief and money. I don't give a damn that an informal family snap was altered. The two pap shots of Catherine in cars would indicate that (unsurprisingly) the poor woman is not looking the way she would wish to look while recovering from a serious procedure. Yes, she may look puffy or tired/drawn/stressed - don't blame her at all for not wanting the world's press analysing her every line/shadow/tense muscle etc etc.

They said she'd be back at Easter. Let's hope that happens.

If the crazies turn out to be correct and she's been severely beaten by her husband, has tried to run away from her royal life or is in fact dead, then I'll eat my tin hat, but not until then.

DappledThings · 17/03/2024 11:04

flashmcdoodle · 17/03/2024 10:20

@DappledThings

Sorry what do you mean? You don't buy what?

That it is "unfathomable" and "significant", as I quoted.

Lalupalina · 17/03/2024 11:10

They play the public for fools whilst living off the tax payer. There vast fortunes would not last long if they had to pay for their own security and the upkeep of all their palaces.

Exactly. What a waste of our tax money!

RosePombear · 17/03/2024 11:14

I’ve never had faith/trust in the royal family. I don’t hate them and I don’t care if we get rid of them or if they stay. I don’t understand what people would have faith or trust in? They’re just people and most of them have done some pretty awful stuff. I find it mad that people are losing faith in them due to made up conspiracies and an edited photograph, but didn’t lose faith in them when everything happened with Andrew, surely that’s much worse.

Microdisney · 17/03/2024 11:17

hairbearbunches · 17/03/2024 10:25

Just came on to say it really does my head in that some people hold the Queen in such high esteem and say it's all gone tits up now she's gone. That woman presided over nothing but decline in this country whilst making sure her own nest remained feathered. She meddled in policy to ensure she wasn't detrimentally affected. Christ, the Royal households are even exempt, afaik, from the equality act, minimum wage act, and anything to do with race.

There's a line that always makes me think of them, from Indecent Proposal. Woody Harrelson says to Robert Redford at the end of the film "I always thought you were the better man, but I know now I was wrong. You just had more money."

I wish the 'subjects' of this country would just wake up and see it for what it is instead of cap doffing and kow towing to a bunch of people who truly lucked out. It feels like the juggernaut is finally turning, but it really needs to start doing donuts in the carpark!

Yes, if you actually ask people about their ‘respect’ for QE2, it appears it’s a completely unconsidered combination of forelock-tugging, a feeling of reassurance that the same ageing face and body was always there as a form of continuity in figureheads, a bizarre appreciation for the fact that she literally never said anything and was more discreet than her more than averagely fucked-up children, a largely unfounded belief that she worked hard, and a nonsensical belief in her integrity, despite her shielding of Andrew and her specific use of ‘Queen’s Consent’ to negotiate the royal households’ exemption from equality acts, and to amend legislation allowing her to hide her private wealth from the public.

A mysteriously large segment of the British public seems to like having someone they consider their superior by birth at the helm, though.

Lalupalina · 17/03/2024 11:24

A mysteriously large segment of the British public seems to like having someone they consider their superior by birth at the helm

What makes you think that? Where's the evidence?

I doubt that very much, personally. But I've happily lived in democracies where the head of state is actually elected!

Artapplicapplications787 · 17/03/2024 11:26

Microdisney · 17/03/2024 11:17

Yes, if you actually ask people about their ‘respect’ for QE2, it appears it’s a completely unconsidered combination of forelock-tugging, a feeling of reassurance that the same ageing face and body was always there as a form of continuity in figureheads, a bizarre appreciation for the fact that she literally never said anything and was more discreet than her more than averagely fucked-up children, a largely unfounded belief that she worked hard, and a nonsensical belief in her integrity, despite her shielding of Andrew and her specific use of ‘Queen’s Consent’ to negotiate the royal households’ exemption from equality acts, and to amend legislation allowing her to hide her private wealth from the public.

A mysteriously large segment of the British public seems to like having someone they consider their superior by birth at the helm, though.

I totally agree with this. I couldn’t understand any of the “nation’s grandmother” rhetoric either.

She carried out her duties in a stalwart way and for a long time but I am sure the majority of working woman on here would have been able to manage that equally well with support staff consisting of chauffeurs, dressers, advisors, ladies in waiting etc when out doing the job, and with chefs, cleaners, nannies, gardeners etc back at home.

RoyalDramaLlama · 17/03/2024 11:35

@DistinguishedSocialCommentator I think, from reading your previous posts, that your main problem is putting people you don't know on a ridiculously high pedestal, and believing wholesale the PR puff you have been fed by William and Kate in the past. That is bound to lead to disappointment when they turn out to just be fairly unremarkable people with not a lot going for them apart from either being born into the right family or marrying well. It does them no favours to blow smoke up their arses for the minimal things they do. Kate is either such an amazing woman that she manages to effortlessly pop out 3 children without even breaking a sweat or putting on any weight unlike us plebs with our mum tums sitting in our pj's with bits falling out off us for days on end, or she needs months off work for an operation whereas he can't even show her face on a zoom.call 3 months afterwards. She is either such an amazing photographer that she can get her photos into books, or she is just a mum messing around amateurishly on Photoshop. William and Kate have sat on their laurels while revelling in being 'not Meghan and Harry' but haven't done anything that stands up to any scrutiny. They have made themselves into something they can't live up to. No one forced them or imposed ' perfect Kate' on them.

Microdisney · 17/03/2024 11:42

Lalupalina · 17/03/2024 11:24

A mysteriously large segment of the British public seems to like having someone they consider their superior by birth at the helm

What makes you think that? Where's the evidence?

I doubt that very much, personally. But I've happily lived in democracies where the head of state is actually elected!

I’m from somewhere with an elected ceremonial HoS, not a political role, which works well.

My evidence, quite apart from the continuing longterm levels of support for the retention of a HoS whose only qualification is that of blood, is in electoral politics. Despite most people being left of the Conservatives, they continually vote Tory, the party of the ruling classes and Empire nostalgia. As revealed by Brexit, the underlying message of ‘Make Britain Great Again!’ Anglo-British nationalism is that posh people ought to be in charge, with the monarchy taking pride of place — because that’s who was running things when you had an Empire. Bluntly, you’re still dealing with the myth of Churchill.

CathyorClaire · 17/03/2024 11:43

No.

Never had it in the first place and it's been far more dishonesty than an ineptly doctored photo that's done it.

Midnightrunners · 17/03/2024 11:44

No.

MyopicBunny · 17/03/2024 11:44

Great post @Microdisney

scalt · 17/03/2024 11:54

Freakinfraser · 17/03/2024 09:41

What? I’m fifty and British. I have mever once been asked to pledge allegiance to the monarchy or go worship them. That’s ridiculous.

Edited

I didn't watch the coronation (I refused to do so while we still can, in case 1984 becomes real, and such things are forcibly broadcast into our homes), but wasn't there something about those watching at home being "invited" to pledge allegiance?

RoyalDramaLlama · 17/03/2024 11:56

C1N1C · 17/03/2024 08:35

I don't think the UK or the monarchy are racist. When it all started, everyone, including all the news outlets, were super excited to see Meghan. Harry was the favourite and WE were all curious about this new injection of personality.

The issues people have had are how she wanted the royal family to change to her way of thinking. It just wasn't going to happen. She clearly wasn't happy playing second fiddle... so she no doubt put pressure on Harry to leave, or it could just as easily have been her giving him the strength to leave his 'oppression'.

Then they wanted to leave and do their own thing, but still use the royal titles... I'm sorry, but royalists and anti-royalists alike are all going to hate that! You're cashing in on a birth privilege (which the UK could probably vote on and remove at any time!), to make money and not give back to the country. Being royal is a JOB (OK, a pretty cushy job, but still).

Then they do the Oprah interview and basically slam their freebies. And no, I don't think the comments was racist, even Chris Rock said it... even black people would be curious what the baby would look like!

So for seven years they've simply been whining about how hard their lives are because of the royal family, yet using the titles and that influence at every turn. They want their own lives, yet cling onto that past. If they really wanted to have their own life, they would relinquish all ties, get normal, boring office jobs, and in doing so, they will get back the respect of everyone.

I honestly think that's all the rest of the world want. There's no 'half-quitting'... a rare smoker is still a smoker, an occasional sexist is still a sexist, a passive royal is still a royal. All in, or all out. No logos, no netflix deals, no abuse of titles. Harry went to one of the best schools, Meghan is a beautiful 'actress', they have all the doors open for them. Be a decent (non-grifting) human being like the rest of us and you'll be loved, or at least respected again.

Harry and Meghan are members of the Royal Family. The Royals were responsible for bringing Harry up to be the petulant, spoilt man child that he is. They have delivered us a family of grifters who live off the money we give to the Monarch and never has anyone challenge them or say no. William and Harry are the same. They both hate the press, they both want to be able to do what they want without any scrutiny whatsoever. They both say they want to live an ordinary life but aren't willing to give up the handouts, the unearned influence or the luxury lifestyle. Harry has committed the worst possible crime ( worse than associating with paedophiles, getting your mum to pay off a sex trafficking victim and hidjngvftom the FBI) and has been disloyal to his family. Even though his father said more or less the same thing years before.

MammaTo · 17/03/2024 12:07

Never had it in the first place. I genuinely can’t wrap my head around people that can’t see through the facade they’ve put on for an eternity and genuinely think the royal family give any thought to the general publics well being.

RoyalDramaLlama · 17/03/2024 12:57

DappledThings · 17/03/2024 10:03

Kensington Palace has now lost its status as a trusted source. This is an unfathomable situation for a Royal Family to be in and is extremely significant.
I just don't buy that. I suspect the next time KP release a photo then:
A) a small but vocal group of people online will make some piss-taking memes
B) an even smaller but more vocal group of people online will scour it for inconsistencies and come up with a hundred new conspiracy theories
C) media organisations will examine it very carefully and point out any possible editing but publish it anyway because it will generate millions of clicks/sales
D) the vast majority of people will continue to consider the entire circus irrelevant and not care if it is edited or not and crack on with their lives having given it a quick glance.

Of course they'll publish it anyway, but the reason that photo was published without scrutiny in the first place is because the RF were a trusted source so they just waved through everything they were sent. Now anything sent from KP will be put through screening processes they weren't before. They won't be able to get anything past them where they would have before.

DappledThings · 17/03/2024 13:10

RoyalDramaLlama · 17/03/2024 12:57

Of course they'll publish it anyway, but the reason that photo was published without scrutiny in the first place is because the RF were a trusted source so they just waved through everything they were sent. Now anything sent from KP will be put through screening processes they weren't before. They won't be able to get anything past them where they would have before.

And still I think "so what?" Some media people will have a bit more work to do, the royal family will have yo do cleverer editing or be more open about editing. Still not seeing that as important.

annonymousse · 17/03/2024 13:18

I had no faith or trust in the first place. I like reading about them and I'm semi interested in their lives but at the end of the day my life doesn't change because of their actions. They are just people

Swipe left for the next trending thread