Right, what I do for a living is uphold standards of accuracy so let’s do this point by point:
telling people you need 3-6 months recovery from surgery
KP issued the statement about surgery in mid January and suggested she’d be back to duties after Easter, which this year is at the end of March. 11 weeks all told, if she shows up directly after Easter; just shy of 3 months and certainly not 6
and [telling people] that you are far too unwell to appear for a photo
They have never said any such thing, have you got a source for this claim?
to the point of merging and editing photos
They’ve always done this for group shots, they just got caught this time. We don’t know why it was done.
lying about taking said photos recently.
We really don’t know that that’s the case. We know the photo was edited, is probably a composite of shots, but we don’t know from when. It’s certainly not the Vogue cover replacing Kate’s face or other outlandish theories.
People are right to be scared for Kate.
Why are they?
Then a couple of days later you are suddenly well enough to go to your kids' school on a weekend and pass by the local farm shop . . . really?
They are trolling you!
A couple of days later than what? It’s now nine weeks after her surgery and a couple of weeks before her expected return, it makes sense that she might be up and about.
If you mean a couple of days after editing a photo, again, we have no idea why that photo was edited nor any evidence to suggest it was done to hide Kate’s health. You’re leaping from A to C here. Also, if the Mother’s Day photo was taken “earlier in the week [than mothers day]”, and Mother’s Day was a week prior to the alleged farm shopping, then it’s not a couple of days later: it’s a week and a half. A lot changes in a week and a half!
Finally, there’s no confirmation about this farm shop sighting. A randomer told The Sun, did they? That bastion of news standards and accurate reporting.
::mic drop::
[Edited for a minor typo.]