More Sussex PR antics

[Gottseidank]

Imagine using the victims of a school shooting for attention and PR. There seem to be no depths to which this pair will not sink

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13178107/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-pay-surprise-visit-sister-teacher-killed-Uvalde-school-massacre-sing-happy-birthday-heartwarming-clip.html

Again, they are far from common. This is a major edit , creating a composite image, ie from other pics, and has been changed 26 times. It’s far from common,

Why do you care? Seriously, this obsession with an edited Mother’s Day pic so social media is so weird

This is a composite image too, by the way. it was used to announce Meghan’s second pregnancy. The photographer, Misan Harriman, gave an interview where he explained how he took it remotely during Covid and digitally inserted the tree into the background. It was published by PA Media also (one of the agencies that issued a kill notice on Sunday’s pictures).

So I can’t see this as as big of a deal as some are trying to make it out to be.

We really aren’t seeing the truth in any of these photos are we? It’s quite depressing.

What? They have never released photos of Harry with a merkin on his head?

@Serenster that is mad. I never knew that photo was constructed in that way!

Interesting double standard

And the top of Harry's head has been digitally transplanted with hair also.

Ahhhh all is well in MN world

KP, and by default W&K have cocked up a pic big time so let's find enhanced pics of H&M to make us all feel better 😭🤣

What about all the photos of Harry with a full head of hair ?
It’s really not as rare to digitally enhance photos as some people seem to think.
Did the late Queen actually meet Paddington ??

But you love pointing out differential treatment of the Sussexes and the Wales…!

You’re literally on a thread about Sussex PR antics. The clue is in the title. But don’t let the facts stop you 😉

I didn’t know this. Most interesting and certainly helps with perspective.

Strange how there was no SM meltdown over this.

I’m oddly upset that the tree isn’t real and they weren’t really there.

But fascinated about “taken remotely”. I didn’t know that was a thing.

And that definitely isn’t the top of Harry’s head

How interesting! Looks like there is a double standard after all, in Harry’s favour after all 😉

It's cringey. Next lap on their we want privacy tour I suppose.

Do inform me which pics of H&M were killed because they were so doctored to be totally against their guidelines?

We're not talking red eye or Harry's hair here!
We're talking about big inconsistencies and a violation of their standards

Harry reminds me of King Cnut.

No, not because of that 😉

But because of his unreasonable demands to the sea.

Stands to reason some of these royal folk take the god ordained mysticism stuff seriously and think they really do have the divine right to do as they want. From ordering the tide back to grief vulturing with great abandon.

@Lifebeganat50

If it was about caring, there would be no photos

So you say this when you see Kate and William at things too do you? Or do you save this little bit of bile just for H&M

H&M have a public profile so like it or not they will be doing things that will be shown to the public. Much like the RF, politicians and other people with a public profile.
You may not like that they have a public profile but that's a you issue.

This one.

Good
It's blurry, can't see it properly, but if it went against their standards it should be pulled.

Otherwise we are going down a very slippery slope and any old doctored image will be fed to us via the media

So looks like it's evens. Both have had it happen once. Both times when trying to protect their and their children's privacy, but still allow the public some access.

Maybe we the public need to take some personal responsibility and act like adults.

Wise sobering words.