Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince William's Absence (Part Two)

1000 replies

MaggieFS · 28/02/2024 09:42

Following on from this glorious thread

William just pulled out of event due to personal reasons http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/theroyall_family/5017144-william-just-pulled-out-of-event-due-to-personal-reasons

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
justasking111 · 29/02/2024 13:25

ItsAllAboutTheDosh · 29/02/2024 13:19

Some MPs have had their security upgraded with 24 hour bodyguards because of credible threats. An MP was murdered last year. To dismiss this as scared poor lambs is beyond disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Jo Cox was murdered in June 2016 nearly eight years ago by a far right extremist, nothing to do with religion. Get your facts straight

"Far-right terrorist Thomas Mair jailed for life for Jo Cox murder | Jo Cox | The Guardian" https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/23/thomas-mair-found-guilty-of-jo-cox-murder

Far-right terrorist Thomas Mair jailed for life for Jo Cox murder | Jo Cox | The Guardian

Unemployed gardener, 53, given whole-life sentence for murder of MP that judge said was inspired by white supremacism

https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/23/thomas-mair-found-guilty-of-jo-cox-murder

upinaballoon · 29/02/2024 13:28

PrincessScarlett · 29/02/2024 13:20

Just been mentioned on BBC lunchtime news following William's synagogue visit. Said he's been asked about Kate, given flowers for her and KP has made a statement saying they are aware of online rumours, there's no change to previous statement in that she will not been seen until after Easter and that she continues to be recovering well.

Edited

Thanks for that. I'm looking here and not at the telly.

I can't remember if William's great grandma is buried in Jerusalem or if she had a tree in the Avenue of the Righteous, so I'm going to google.

I thought that the statement which he put out a couple of weeks ago was worded properly. It was along the lines of 'concern about the number of deaths', neutral.

ItsAllAboutTheDosh · 29/02/2024 13:31

@justasking111 Nobody except you mentioned religion.
Jo Cox is not the only MP who has been murdered. Arness was the most recent one.
On 15 October 2021, David Amess, a British Conservative Party politician and Member of Parliament for Southend West, was fatally stabbed at a constituency surgery at Belfairs Methodist Church Hall in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex.

ItsAllAboutTheDosh · 29/02/2024 13:34

@justasking111 you were right it was not last year, it was in 2011 Arness was murdered.
Mike Freer this year had an arson attack on his constituency office alongside death threats.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68167540

Mike Freer at election count

Hate faced by MP Mike Freer is attack on democracy, says Downing Street

The justice minister is to stand down at the next election, saying he has had enough of threats to his safety.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68167540

Serenster · 29/02/2024 13:40

ItsAllAboutTheDosh · 29/02/2024 12:57

@Serenster it is impossible to know if super injunctions exist. The foreign press report lots of strange stories about the royals that may be made up, or may be true and not reported here due to super injunctions.

No, it’s quite easy actually. Ask Jeremy Clarkson. Or Ryan Giggs. The fatal problem is that to make sure that everyone you want gagged by the court order is bound by it, you have to serve a copy on it. And journalists hate them.

So, if you are a UK based office of a global media company, and get served with the order, you will know that you can’t publish the story, or even the fact that there’s an injunction. But your French/US/Australian arm can. What is to stop you tipping them off? And what is to stop you setting up an anonymous Twitter account to tweet about it? Or tipping off a sympathetic MP who will then mention it in parliament? This is how previous ones have been revealed.

And none of the superinjunctions revealed previously have had anywhere close to the global newsworthiness that a Royal family one would.

laclochette · 29/02/2024 13:42

Superinjunctions are either now not legal or are much rarer following a legal review...can't remember which but there was a good discussion of them on the most recent Private Eye podcast!

(This is not the same as matters of national security being kept secret.)

thefallen · 29/02/2024 13:43

Maybe controversial but I don't think Kate is anywhere near as ill as people fear. She and Billy Idle have never exactly chomped at the bit to work, have they? I think she had a minor procedure and has used it as an excuse to have a few months off from her arduous schedule of a couple of half-days a week showing up and smiling.

Serenster · 29/02/2024 13:44

The reason speculative or salacious stories about the Royal family are published overseas but not here is the UK’s libel laws, generally. Papers are worried about being sued if they print something they can’t prove is true.

If the Palace was constantly at the courts seeking injunctions, we would know. The press would hate it and be determined to make sure it came out.

justasking111 · 29/02/2024 13:51

Jeremy Clarkson lifted his apparently they're too exp to keep going 😂

User7825525 · 29/02/2024 13:53

pinksunglasses · 29/02/2024 11:12

For me, the most compelling ‘clue’ that something is wrong is the lack of response to the whole internet saying that something is wrong!

I think it’s quite unusual for them to not even try to quell this level of speculation. It’s surprising that they’ve not tried to appease people with a generic photo of Kate and a message of thanks for the well wishes. People might not buy it, but usually they’d give it a go anyway! 😅

Interestingly, this exact viewpoint was written in an article from a German newspaper (reputable, not a tabloid). Went looking out of curiosity to see if foreign press was writing something different. Basically nothing new and simply publishing the same updates as the British press. However the German press had a different tone of voice and stated exactly what you did in relation to wild rumours. They went out of their way to emphasise that the Palace is usually quick to quash rumours or untruths and how it was very, very unusual that they are not addressing any of the current questions regarding Kate. It sounds like they know more about the situation but cannot publish anything that hasn't appeared in British media due to their reputable name. Unlike the Spanish tabloids, German publications tend to only publish or paraphrase exactly what has appeared in British media despite not being bound by law.

justasking111 · 29/02/2024 13:54

Guto Bebb used parliamentary privilege it didn't end well.

BirthdayRainbow · 29/02/2024 13:56

EchoChamber · 29/02/2024 04:22

I agree with this. The lack of compassion is quite depressing. He is in a very isolated position really, and one few of us can really truly understand. If Charles dies he has lost all his immediate family and is faced with becoming King without the support and guidance of more experienced senior members. Anne would no doubt be supportive but they don’t seem close or much in tune. Who is he going to turn to? Kate isn’t born into it . He needs someone older and wiser, someone he trusts to lean on. Charles doesn’t strike me as that person really. The Queen had her mother and sister to rely on. She leaned on them heavily. When William becomes King he’s going to have to be his own counsel . It’s a lonely role to perform in isolation.

Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh would be a brilliant support I feel.

Serenster · 29/02/2024 13:58

The palace has basically now said - yes we know about the speculation but what we told you in January still stands. So they are not leaning into the crazy. Good for them.

CurlewKate · 29/02/2024 13:59

"When William becomes King he’s going to have to be his own counsel . It’s a lonely role to perform in isolation."

What will he need "counsel" on?

FrancisSeaton · 29/02/2024 13:59

thefallen · 29/02/2024 13:43

Maybe controversial but I don't think Kate is anywhere near as ill as people fear. She and Billy Idle have never exactly chomped at the bit to work, have they? I think she had a minor procedure and has used it as an excuse to have a few months off from her arduous schedule of a couple of half-days a week showing up and smiling.

I agree

Novella4 · 29/02/2024 13:59

The entire ‘royal’ edifice is enveloped in a fog of secrecy .

Their wills are secret, Andrew’s ‘ business’ record is secret, for years they they hushed up the fact that Edward and the former queen mother were sympathetic to the Nazis etc etc

They have no need of super injunctions although I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they used them - they simply invoke ‘national security’

Personally I have no interest in their affairs / scandals ( few people are stupid enough to believe the PR fairytale nonsense the media spins) but I do strongly object to the secrecy regarding their political interference and their financial dealings
The Windsors live off the public.
We have a right to transparency just as we do with any other public body.
We are not deemed worthy of such transparency however when it comes to the Windsors. They do as they please and to hell with the rest of us

BirthdayRainbow · 29/02/2024 14:01

spriots · 29/02/2024 06:18

Also isn't 3 months with two public engagements kind of an indication that he does get the ability to "escape"? Not permanently obviously but he and Kate take.tons of time off at the best of times, have a lot of privacy at Anmer and go on many amazing holidays.

I dunno, it doesn't seem that awful to me as a life

So you'd love your life and actions raked over by strangers ?

yesmen · 29/02/2024 14:03

SecondUsername4me · 29/02/2024 08:11

The "how can they be finding it difficult, they have no real worries" narrative is quite disgusting tbh.

There are many many families up and down the country who are struggling with various things. Some of these families will be wealthy, some won't. Some of these families will have ailing parents, some won't. Some of these families will have work challenges, some won't.

It's all relative. Making "struggling" or "suffering with MH/stress" only the domain of those you deem worthy of it is nasty. It can hit anyone for anything. It's relatice to your personal circumstances.

But surely ALL families struggle?

Some more, some less, but all families/people struggle.

Life itself is filled with daily struggle.

Adults keep going, it is the price of entry to adulthood.

Unless there is some heightened, extreme issue the the PoW should Keep Calm And Carry On.

By any measure he is an adult, and one of the most facilitated men on the planet. He has an army of people to dress him, cook for him, clean for him, drive for him, fly for him, research for him, write for him, think for him, coach him, whisper in his ear, even die for him. For most things he just needs to show up, bless people with a smile and a wave, talk about the weather.

This is a very poor show from him. He does not come across as a team player in any way, shape, or size.

The king is also at fault - a "slimed down monarchy" in which he keeps all the money for himself has an enormous cost as we now see. For a man who had decades to map out his management of the role he is messing up pretty badly.

justasking111 · 29/02/2024 14:04

Serenster · 29/02/2024 13:58

The palace has basically now said - yes we know about the speculation but what we told you in January still stands. So they are not leaning into the crazy. Good for them.

Nothing to see here, stop frothing KP should have said but they're much too polite 😂😂

ToffeeTalk · 29/02/2024 14:04

Serenster · 29/02/2024 12:41

There is no super injunction. Ironically, because if there was, everyone outside of the UK would be reporting on it instantly. Particularly if it was anyone in the Royal Family (That’s kind of why people don’t bother with them any more…)

Serenster if you read back you'll see that I was picking up a suggestion made by a previous poster. I agree that these injunctions are of questionable use. I nevertheless think that Harry is witholding certain 'inside info' and that William has a reason to be nervous. So he might well seek advice on how to limit what Harry can say, and want that advice in a hurry or panic.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/02/2024 14:05

BirthdayRainbow · 29/02/2024 13:56

Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh would be a brilliant support I feel.

I’ve always thought this, she did accompany him to an event a few months ago but it’s the only time I’ve noticed it, it would be nice if she had attended the BAFTA’s with him, though I think she may have been on holiday. I like Sophie, it would have been a good PR move for her to step in more while Kate is recuperating and made the RF look more solid and united, working together in a time of crisis.

yesmen · 29/02/2024 14:07

ExactlySo · 29/02/2024 08:12

But the late Queen was criticised for never being there for her children and the implication is they developed into a dysfunctional family, all with 'issues' of some kind.

W&C want to be hands on parents. They have 3 children.

If they were not being hands-on parents, people would criticise that.

Princess A is not the angel some people think. Some of her constant work is possibly to get away from her H!

This country is filled with hands on parents who manage to work as well.

All without the back up this crew have.

And by the way, they are not being asked to go down the mines!

Roussette · 29/02/2024 14:09

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/02/2024 14:05

I’ve always thought this, she did accompany him to an event a few months ago but it’s the only time I’ve noticed it, it would be nice if she had attended the BAFTA’s with him, though I think she may have been on holiday. I like Sophie, it would have been a good PR move for her to step in more while Kate is recuperating and made the RF look more solid and united, working together in a time of crisis.

That's far too a sensible suggestion for the Palace! I honestly think they haven't got a clue PR wise at times

I imagine they are reactive and fire fighting as opposed to forward thinking

Roussette · 29/02/2024 14:11

yesmen · 29/02/2024 14:03

But surely ALL families struggle?

Some more, some less, but all families/people struggle.

Life itself is filled with daily struggle.

Adults keep going, it is the price of entry to adulthood.

Unless there is some heightened, extreme issue the the PoW should Keep Calm And Carry On.

By any measure he is an adult, and one of the most facilitated men on the planet. He has an army of people to dress him, cook for him, clean for him, drive for him, fly for him, research for him, write for him, think for him, coach him, whisper in his ear, even die for him. For most things he just needs to show up, bless people with a smile and a wave, talk about the weather.

This is a very poor show from him. He does not come across as a team player in any way, shape, or size.

The king is also at fault - a "slimed down monarchy" in which he keeps all the money for himself has an enormous cost as we now see. For a man who had decades to map out his management of the role he is messing up pretty badly.

Totally agree.

William has a team of about 90 working for him, yet can't seem to grab his role by the balls and do much

MrsLeonFarrell · 29/02/2024 14:17

Serenster · 29/02/2024 13:58

The palace has basically now said - yes we know about the speculation but what we told you in January still stands. So they are not leaning into the crazy. Good for them.

I agree.

William is at an engagement today and apparently mentioned Catherine.

I doubt it will stop the online rubbish though.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread