Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

New Sussex website

1000 replies

MaturingCheeseball · 12/02/2024 21:39

So I see there is a brand-new Duke and Duchess of Sussex website. Very glossy.

But the self-aggrandising! I just read Meghan’s bio and - cringe - it was the worst of LinkedIn. Sometimes less is more!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
Bookist · 13/02/2024 16:28

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 13/02/2024 16:26

No I’m sure I read somewhere it was a condition of her divorce settlement that she stay single and as the King’s Sister. It’s also been pointed out that as too was supposed to have been pre contracted before her her marriage to Henry and then his views on her body and personality and having cast her aside that who would want her as a wife then? Plus her English wasn’t good (but improved) and she almost certainly didn’t want to return to Cleves to her brother and mother who were both very strict, moralistic and the brother sounds unhinged.

Erm, I think maybe you have read The Boleyn Inheritance by Philippa Gregory? It's a good read but you really can't take it as being historically accurate.

wildernesssw · 13/02/2024 16:28

Hmmm, I don't hold much confidence in confessions of the era!

Bookist · 13/02/2024 16:29

wildernesssw · 13/02/2024 16:27

Anyway, this is a bit of a derail, and we will get our wrists slapped by MN! But I do love a bit of historical gossip and speculation!

Yes, very true. Better leave this for another thread.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 13/02/2024 16:30

Bookist · 13/02/2024 16:28

Erm, I think maybe you have read The Boleyn Inheritance by Philippa Gregory? It's a good read but you really can't take it as being historically accurate.

Nope, in a historical book, either Antonia Fraser or Alison Weir or even Starkey.

Bookist · 13/02/2024 16:31

Definitely not Starkey. The other two are still just novelists.

Freefree · 13/02/2024 16:31

@Maireas no I haven't because I don't care about Harry or Meghan, but I also don't get why people pick apart every single thing she's involved with.
There's worse people in the world!

Maireas · 13/02/2024 16:32

Getthethrowonthesofa · 13/02/2024 16:28

I never thought I’d say it, but I genuinely feel sorry for Charles.

after all they went through with them leaving, the clearly arduous discussions to ensure they didn’t monetise being royal. To try to support them making it on their own.

And five years later, here we are, they are going for it, as they have fully failed at their commercial enterprises.

Now blatantly using their royal titles for commercial gain and as publicly as possible, even relaunching the exact same Sussex royal website that has lain Dormant since 2020 ,with simply royal and hrh taken out.

charles will be forced to act. The only thing I can see at his disposal is to remove the Sussex titles and leave Harry as a prince. But I’m not sure that will stop them. They will regroup, and go for it again, with prince and princess Harry.

Yes, it's interesting that they've chosen a time when Charles is ill and William is distracted by Kate's health problems.

Turtlerussell · 13/02/2024 16:33

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Rubyreddgirl · 13/02/2024 16:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SoundTheSirens · 13/02/2024 16:35

Isitovernow123 · 13/02/2024 12:36

And there was me thinking that there was a decent site about living in Sussex, not just 2 people who have had such a hard life…..

Same! I opened it from Trending thinking I'd find out what was going on in Brighton, Midhurst and the Weald & Downland Living Museum.

Maireas · 13/02/2024 16:35

Freefree · 13/02/2024 16:31

@Maireas no I haven't because I don't care about Harry or Meghan, but I also don't get why people pick apart every single thing she's involved with.
There's worse people in the world!

Worse people in the world?
Not the crime of the century?
People know that.
I have no idea why there's such a low bar for Meghan and Harry. Just because they're not master criminals they're above criticism?.

Turtlerussell · 13/02/2024 16:35

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Namechange4976 · 13/02/2024 16:36

This reply has been deleted

Withdrawn at poster's request

Their timings always seem very deliberately chosen to cause maximum damage to the RF and hit them in the weakest spots.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 13/02/2024 16:36

Bookist · 13/02/2024 16:31

Definitely not Starkey. The other two are still just novelists.

Look I don’t want to argue by Antonia Fraser is said to be a historian as well as a novelist as are others. As there’s very few pieces of written documents surviving from the past and that era then research can be hard generally. Either you go down the records route or not. So yes supposition can be the case in past history.

NonPlayerCharacter · 13/02/2024 16:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Is Harry just like Charles, then?

Turtlerussell · 13/02/2024 16:37

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

user8800 · 13/02/2024 16:38

All hanger on royals use their royalty for monetary gain

(Peter Phillips, DofYork daughters, zara Phillips...)

The difference is that it's done internationally and quietly (Peter Phillips Whiskey TV ads in Japan?)

Zara Phillips is a "director" of a race course and "works" 2 days a year for £££££

H&Ms mistake was being so vocal about it and flouncing in such a ridiculous way.

They left just as covid hit. They became an irrelevance far sooner than they would have.

That new website is beyond parody.

Recent health issues for the main royals mean that, had they stayed, put the hours in, they would currently be the main show.

Which is obviously all they have ever cared about.

Gowlett · 13/02/2024 16:38

I’m fine with him as Prince Harry. The title is all he’s got to trade on. It’s who he’s always been (even now he doesn’t want to be). I think if he showed up to any of these award ceremonies etc in the States as just Harry, nobody would have the foggiest…

But her just being Meghan (and Meghan)? She thinks she’s Beyoncé, Madonna, Oprah. Ridiculous! I don’t think kids need their titles either. Meghan is the American school of fake it til you make it, but the problem is she’s just not very talented…

Rubyreddgirl · 13/02/2024 16:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JaneJeffer · 13/02/2024 16:39

Is Harry just like Charles, then?
Snort

FloofCloud · 13/02/2024 16:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

That's not a pleasant thing to say about Lily and Archie

User3353235 · 13/02/2024 16:40

My take is that they already know that many projects are ending and they need to spruce up their outward image for potential new partners or investors. Meghan who is almost certainly a narcissist, needs their accolades & titles written down afresh to give her renewed supply. In summary, it's all smoke and mirrors trying to prop up a burning house. The multimillion contracts they had when the first Archewell website launched have all been cancelled and they're hoping a new website might fool new partners into signing up.

NonPlayerCharacter · 13/02/2024 16:41

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 13/02/2024 16:26

No I’m sure I read somewhere it was a condition of her divorce settlement that she stay single and as the King’s Sister. It’s also been pointed out that as too was supposed to have been pre contracted before her her marriage to Henry and then his views on her body and personality and having cast her aside that who would want her as a wife then? Plus her English wasn’t good (but improved) and she almost certainly didn’t want to return to Cleves to her brother and mother who were both very strict, moralistic and the brother sounds unhinged.

It wasn't a condition per se, but the annulment rested on her being pre-contracted to Francis of Lorraine and therefore not free to marry anyone else.

Caused a bit of diplomatic embarrassment when Francis married because Henry couldn't congratulate him or officially recognise the marriage, since he'd annulled his own marriage on the basis that the pre-contract was still binding.

pitsoffashion · 13/02/2024 16:43

But they ARE Prince Archie and princess lillibet :) Even though they live in California they may as well use the titles 🤷‍♀️ Because they can.

Turtlerussell · 13/02/2024 16:44

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.