Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

New Sussex website

1000 replies

MaturingCheeseball · 12/02/2024 21:39

So I see there is a brand-new Duke and Duchess of Sussex website. Very glossy.

But the self-aggrandising! I just read Meghan’s bio and - cringe - it was the worst of LinkedIn. Sometimes less is more!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
AcrossthePond55 · 14/02/2024 17:34

Runnerinthenight · 14/02/2024 14:42

@AcrossthePond55 I don't think they understand very much about anything!

You know, I think Meghann understands quite well how Hollywood works and I think that at one time Harry understood how the RF works but now that he's taken Meghann's philosophy and beliefs as his own he's forgotten the realities he grew up with. The 'problem' is that neither of them seem to get that 'never the twain shall meet'. And in their anger and frustration they're lashing out with ugliness and bile. If they haven't already, they'll soon cross the Rubicon with The King and Queen. I think they already have with the Waleses.

Obviously I come at this from a US POV, so I 'get' why they're doing what they're doing from a 'commercial' standpoint; using whatever you have to get whatever you want. To a certain extent, that's 'The American Way'. Blackening your family name is not included in that, although plenty of people have done exactly that and made millions. But their reputations have been shredded in the process and none of them remained in the 'top tier' of their particular sphere.

The problem is that they are using an institution that has traditions and standards going back, what, a thousand years? And they seem to be acting as if Harry is nothing more than a Hollywood 'nepo baby' who uses a famous parent's name to shoehorn himself (and by extension, her) into a position of fame, power, and money. Maybe if H was the son of the Duke of 'Wherever' this might work with just a few raised eyebrows and some quiet scorn. But not with the RF and not after vilifying them so publicly. The interest in and 'veneration' (tongue in cheek there) of the British RF by certain US people and institutions seems to be an American 'peculiarity', one I obviously share (or I wouldn't be on this thread lol).

But another 'peculiarity' of US business, especially Hollywood, is smilingly using things and people one has disdain for, then kicking them to the kerb when they no longer serve their purpose. H&M are underestimating this in their efforts to maintain their 'relevance'. Will they continue in their philanthropy once it doesn't get them invited to the right parties and no one is paying them to give speeches? Who knows. But it will happen.

Turtlerussell · 14/02/2024 17:37

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

BigWillyLittleTodger · 14/02/2024 17:38

Getthethrowonthesofa · 14/02/2024 10:48

Looking at all the comments across social media platforms, this is starting to become damaging for the monarchy, people are seeing Charles as weak and unable to manage his son, like the queen , managed them on their exit, and protect the monarchy.

where as the royals were in the winning camp with the no comment strategy, this website is a step too far for many people. And opinion seems to be they need to now act. Folks understand it’s his son, but enough is enough,

I actually am also starting to believe that Charles is a weak father and has let Harry away with so much, and that is partially the root cause of him doing what he pleases, as he pleases, with no thought of repurcussions, and behave spitefully when he doesn’t get his own way. I suspect it goes back way further than the exit. Way back to childhood.

the issue the royals have is if they now just do nothing and say nothing, they become tarred by the brush of Harry and Megan, it looks like fear of acting, or worst case even supporting.

as much as it is an awful time for him, I think Charles needs to recognise his own son did this, he chose this time, and that his failure to act is now starting to drag the monarchy down to Harry’s level.

with Charles and Kate out of action, the royals are now reduced to Harry and Megan cashing in. And the palace looking the other way. Again.

My thoughts exactly, I have been a supporter and very sympathetic to the royal family and what H&M have put them through over the years but in all honesty I’m sick of supporting them now, I’m tired of it, why should I defend the Royal family and our head of state when they do absolutely nothing to defend the institution, our country, the commonwealth or themselves. As far as I’m concerned H&M can set up their own American court and have a pretend coronation for all I care now.

Maireas · 14/02/2024 17:39

Thank you, @AcrossthePond55 - an interesting perspective. I have often wondered why a royal couple like Harry and Meghan would be so lionised in the USA. You've explained it well.
What about Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet? Growing up in California - will those titles open doors for them?

Novella4 · 14/02/2024 17:39

I haven’t read the thread but I have asked about a republican topic too .

Id say the Mumsnet readership probably sways republican - certainly you can see that when royalist debates are on the mainstream boards like AIBU or chat .
It was abundantly clear during mournathon.
I suspect the republican input / debate keeps these boards going . They were dead for years and years .

RhubarbGingerJam · 14/02/2024 17:40

He and Meghan are royalists through and through - there's nothing wrong with that in itself .

I think they want the monarchy but they want to be at top - ie King and Queen or equivalent - do no work or no unfun work make money from it and be based in USA not UK.

I can understand Meghan being an American why she thought it might be possible to get near that - culturally she lack the knowledge of what and how RF works she lack any cultural references really - but why was Harry was confused about what it entailed and then publicly moans about hierarchies as if the monarchy being one is news to him.

Maireas · 14/02/2024 17:42

I don't know, @RhubarbGingerJam - he seems to be very badly informed on many issues.

AliceOlive · 14/02/2024 17:45

Maireas · 14/02/2024 17:39

Thank you, @AcrossthePond55 - an interesting perspective. I have often wondered why a royal couple like Harry and Meghan would be so lionised in the USA. You've explained it well.
What about Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet? Growing up in California - will those titles open doors for them?

I took the point to be that they are not being lionized in the US at all. They are being used where/when it suits while the users hold their noses and roll their eyes. That matches with my own perception. The comments from the Spotify guy certainly supports the theory. He let the veil down for a moment.

Maireas · 14/02/2024 17:46

Ok, thanks @AliceOlive - it seems like a risky situation. What about the children's titles?

Mylovelygreendress · 14/02/2024 17:47

Pringlescave376 · 14/02/2024 16:43

Harry as the son of the current king, and brother to the future king, is forever connected to the monarchy whether he likes it or not. And he has always been very clear that he never wanted to leave or reject his title but circumstances made it very difficult for him to stay. Everyone conveniently ignores that point of course.

The circumstances that “made it difficult for him to stay “ were that the late Queen refused to allow the half in/ half out proposal. That’s why they flounced off . Had the late Queen agreed I don’t think we would have heard all their complaints.
But some people conveniently ignore that point.

Runnerinthenight · 14/02/2024 17:50

@Pringlescave376 I pity their dc growing up and reading all of this hatred directed at their parents that’s for sure.

Don't you think it's up to their parents to protect them from all this and not publicly diss the RF, and talk about frozen todgers etc - rather than blame people for reacting to the very public antics of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex? They are the ones creating this shitshow!

AliceOlive · 14/02/2024 17:52

Raincloudsonasunnyday · 14/02/2024 16:18

😀

Maybe it's a Brit versus American thing, but to me "from the desk of" implies someone with a Very Important Job, who has a secretary dealing with correspondence on their behalf. Not someone with an actual desk in a spare bedroom in her apartment, writing her own thank you notes for not-very-important things. It's all a bit of a show - an affectation. She could have thanked me in person next time she saw me (which will undoubtedly be taking the trash out later today, or some such!). It may now be a quaint Southern hangover, but goes to show it doesn't work with everyone (and I'm surprised it works for a Californian).

"From the office of" implies many staff, dealing with different aspects of the Very Important Job that can't possibly be handled by the Very Important Person themselves, who in any event is off doing much more important things: ex-Presidents, senators, congressmen/women, Supreme Court judges etc. As far as I can tell, H&M's office is that Pottery Barn table with two wooden thrones in the stone-walled library in their house, and they seem to be letting go of many staff. I may be wrong, though. I'm sure they do have PAs and whatnot.

Maybe. But I don’t think so. This has been printed across the top of stationery all my life - even designed for children. It really isn’t intended to make anyone come across as important.

I think it’s a bit depressing that someone would view a hand written note with the disdain you describe. The people that still bother with them are generally pretty damn sincere. Maybe just don’t do any more things for people so that you don’t have to be burdened this way. 😉

AliceOlive · 14/02/2024 17:53

Maireas · 14/02/2024 17:46

Ok, thanks @AliceOlive - it seems like a risky situation. What about the children's titles?

Just like RFF, some will fall all over themselves and some will roll their eyes.

Serenster · 14/02/2024 17:53

Pringlescave376 · 14/02/2024 16:52

Thank you for a measured response CoffeeCantata it’s appreciated.

None of us know what they are like for sure though do we? Our perception of them is fed through a prism of ghost writers, journalists and tv production companies, all of whom have their eye on the money.

What we do know is that before all of this happened, Harry was one of the most unstuffy members of the RF who didn’t appear to be high and mighty in the way he came across. You can’t have a successful career in the forces if you put on airs and graces. And Meghan was a hard working actress who was a UN ambassador and did charity work.

You say that we don’t know what they are like, then give us a perception of Harry straight from the Royal PR team.

According to his own account of himself, that same period Harry was a binge-drinking, staff-abusing, deeply unhappy young man, who didn’t want to visit earthquake victims in Tibet and deeply resented large aspects of his lifestyle. The two pictures are hard to reconcile.

Runnerinthenight · 14/02/2024 18:04

Pringlescave376 · Today 16:43

Harry as the son of the current king, and brother to the future king, is forever connected to the monarchy whether he likes it or not. And he has always been very clear that he never wanted to leave or reject his title but circumstances made it very difficult for him to stay. Everyone conveniently ignores that point of course.

What a load of rubbish! You've totally bought into the myth that circumstances made it very difficult for him to stay!!!

What would he have done if he hadn't married an American wife, who clearly had her own agenda and was determined to go back to California? Who scorned everything about the RF and even took the piss out of the Queen (her exaggerated curtsy was disgusting and totally disrespectful! An elderly lady who had been nothing but kind to her!). She was never going to settle for a life of duty like Kate. Even though she wasn't a person of any significance she has such aspirations to grandeur, and she was never going to play second fiddle to anyone.

Talking of fiddle, she has played Harry like one! I'm not sure what "circumstances made it difficult" because any of the circumstances that led to them leaving were all of their own making.

RhubarbGingerJam · 14/02/2024 18:06

Had the late Queen agreed I don’t think we would have heard all their complaints.But some people conveniently ignore that point.

I think we'd have still heard massive complaints - every time they didn't get everything they wanted - but slow drip drip - and like now any mistakes or missteps would always be other people's faults.

Also not sure they'd have managed to keep bullying stuff as much under warp or that they'd have coped with negative press because UK press does go after all the women who marry into the RF which is nasty and Meghan once again seem ill prepared for.

I think our Queen saw the issues with their proposals and their behavior and just shut down an even worse situation.

Runnerinthenight · 14/02/2024 18:07

@Mylovelygreendress The circumstances that “made it difficult for him to stay “ were that the late Queen refused to allow the half in/ half out proposal. That’s why they flounced off . Had the late Queen agreed I don’t think we would have heard all their complaints.
But some people conveniently ignore that point.

They threw their toys out of the pram because they didn't get their own way. Half in, half out could never have worked - complete conflict of interests.

Do you think if the Queen had agreed, they would have been happy? I don't think they would have because it would never have been enough.

Turtlerussell · 14/02/2024 18:12

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

AcrossthePond55 · 14/02/2024 18:14

Maireas · 14/02/2024 17:39

Thank you, @AcrossthePond55 - an interesting perspective. I have often wondered why a royal couple like Harry and Meghan would be so lionised in the USA. You've explained it well.
What about Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet? Growing up in California - will those titles open doors for them?

What @AliceOlive said is pretty spot on "I took the point to be that they are not being lionized in the US at all. They are being used where/when it suits while the users hold their noses and roll their eyes".

Obviously there is a smattering of actual 'adoration', but it's for their titles, not for them as people. And that's what fades. Similar to the D&DoW. They were 'top news' during the abdication crisis and invited everywhere, but they ended up fading into 'genteel obscurity' after time, with just a few loyal hangers on.

As far as PA and PL, I really don't know. This is such an unusual situation and one I can't think of a precedent for. IMHO they would be true 'nepo babies', whose entree would be based mostly on their parent's cachet, if they have any left. Unless of course, they distinguish themselves based on their own merit, of course. I mean, I'm sure there will be always be businesses who value having "Prince/ss A/L of Sussex" somewhere on their promotional material. I guess it depends on what they want for their lives. Will it help them break into show biz or get on a pro sports team? Nah. But the titles might 'help' if they want to get into the fashion industry or some other 'arty' career.

IMHO, I have a feeling that since they're being raised in the US and will (I assume) attend US schools that their titles will end up meaning very little to them in 'practical terms'. I'm sure the vast majority of 'nepo babies' prefer to make in on their own merits. Hopefully A&L will take that path.

Runnerinthenight · 14/02/2024 18:16

@AcrossthePond55 You know, I think Meghann understands quite well how Hollywoodworks and I think thatat one timeHarry understood how the RF works but now that he's taken Meghann's philosophy and beliefs as his own he's forgotten the realities he grew up with. The 'problem' is that neither of them seem to get that 'never the twain shall meet'. And in their anger and frustration they're lashing out with ugliness and bile. If they haven't already, they'll soon cross the Rubicon with The King and Queen. I think they already have with the Waleses

Excellent post. He's so blinded by everything Meghan isn't he? I think William was right to warn him about rushing things, as well as the friend whose name I forget, who got excluded from part of the wedding because he also urged caution.

You have to begin to wonder whether Harry ever really understood how the RF is, even though he grew up at the heart of it?

I do think it's time that the RF drew a line in the sand and I think that Harry is nasty and selfish to do this to his father while he is ill. But then they never gave a damn when the Queen and Prince Philip were also ill, and indeed dying, when he pulled all that shit on them.

It's pretty unforgiveable!

Maireas · 14/02/2024 18:17

Very interesting. Thanks, @AcrossthePond55 and @AliceOlive .

Runnerinthenight · 14/02/2024 18:17

Turtlerussell · Today 18:12

What a coincidence, they ran off just as the bullying was coming to light. It’s a shame that’s been buried - looks like their deflect and distract tactics worked, unfortunately.

I wish they would release the report now that the Queen is no longer alive.

Turtlerussell · 14/02/2024 18:23

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

wildernesssw · 14/02/2024 18:24

I suppose that the Prince-who-wasn't at the Legends of Aviation awards finds a title helps? I expect it opens some doors. Whether they are the doors you want to open is another question.

mrsmingleton · 14/02/2024 18:27

If you recall from that article in the Cut this is the office of Harry and M.

New Sussex website
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread