Totally agree. I'd go so far as to say that Diana, at 19, probably didn't have a plan to become the limelight when she married Charles. Meghan, in her 30s and a struggling and aging actress in North America moving into her second marriage, I think intended to bask in the limelight being reflected upon her by association with the RF. Hence why she's so routinely accused of using her charitable endeavours (such as they are) for her personal gain: they are useful for making the spotlight shine on her.
Speaking of which, is there anyone else thinking that, after last night's appearance in Las Vegas, Harry's 24 hours trip to London to see his Dad for 30 minutes was a pre-emptive PR strike? In that, there's no way he could weather the PR storm if Charles's diagnosis became known at the weekend -> silence from Harry -> he pops up at a glitzy American awards ceremony in Las Vegas on the Thursday. Harry needs to be seen to be still-Royal; it's all he's got and the only thing that keeps him getting the gigs he gets. He has to kiss the ring from time to time, in order to go play in Hollywood. This week's visit to pater was basically that. Keeping his agents happy.
Which means that his trip to London was for personal gain, appearance's sake (he certainly didn't have any meaningful time with his parent) so he could make last night's appearance look not-appalling. He basically used his dad.
He's totally, utterly lost to this California 'dream', made a pact with the devil. He's basically traded one machine for another. He, like I thought Meghan was from the get go (and initially had quite a bit of respect for her, for it) is hustling and stopping at nothing to progress.
Edited