Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Omid Scobie Endgame PART 5

1000 replies

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 11/12/2023 10:56

A continuing civilised and enjoyable discussion of all things relating to Endgame. Please keep posts on topic - I do not want to have to invoke Ross Gellar again!

Previous thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/the_royal_family/4957618-omid-scobie-endgame-part-4?page=1

Omid Scobie Endgame PART 4 | Mumsnet

Continuing an enjoyable and civilised discussion of Endgame, and all things relating to its contents. Previous thread: [[https://www.mumsnet.com/ta...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/the_royal_family/4957618-omid-scobie-endgame-part-4?page=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
40
rosyglowcondition · 12/12/2023 12:01

@Cosywintertime Yes, I did say that now that he has admitted it was there in an early draft and exonerated them, they can't sue...pity 😂

rosyglowcondition · 12/12/2023 12:02

Brings to mind... oh what a tangled web we weave!

Scoobydoobywho · 12/12/2023 12:06

Going back to the various people that were put forward to help Meghan navigate her way in the Royal family, if she turned them all down because she said"I had Harry". That didn't exactly work out well for her did it. Harry has been as helpful to her as a chocolate teapot.

SidekickSylvia · 12/12/2023 12:16

Meghan kept a journal/diary during her short time as a working royal. I think she wanted to fill it with little snippets of information and conversations with Catherine and/or The Queen, which could have happened if they were the ones helping her. If her plan was to write a book, she would know that nobody's interested in the opinions or small talk of Susan Hussey or The Queen's equerry.

AliceOlive · 12/12/2023 12:19

Scoobydoobywho · 12/12/2023 12:06

Going back to the various people that were put forward to help Meghan navigate her way in the Royal family, if she turned them all down because she said"I had Harry". That didn't exactly work out well for her did it. Harry has been as helpful to her as a chocolate teapot.

I’m really stuck on how deeply offensive it is to have assumed the offer of the assistance of this highly accomplished gentleman was only about the color of his skin. The language “stuck out like a sore thumb” is wretched. Scobie should be ashamed.

https://torontosun.com/news/world/meghan-markle-insulted-after-palace-assigned-her-black-royal-aide/wcm/95b42118-33de-4917-b2b6-c8ad2a7f84db/amp/

Meghan Markle ‘insulted’ after palace assigned her black royal aide

A book mentions how Meghan was assigned the Queen’s black equerry so she would “feel comfortable.”

https://torontosun.com/news/world/meghan-markle-insulted-after-palace-assigned-her-black-royal-aide/wcm/95b42118-33de-4917-b2b6-c8ad2a7f84db/amp/

AliceOlive · 12/12/2023 12:32

And not just “an equerry” as “Meghan’s friend” described him. The Queen’s own Equerry! The Queen herself wasn’t above his assistance, but it was an insult to Meghan?

The comparison to what Catherine may have been offered by her friend is so telling. Embarrassing! I’m sure Catherine was not offered the level of assistance that Meghan apparently declined. Which is it? They offered no help or they offered too much?

Wonder when exactly on the timeline this happened.

Cottonsockkitty · 12/12/2023 12:41

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 12/12/2023 12:42

And not just “an equerry” as “Meghan’s friend” described him. The Queen’s own Equerry! The Queen herself wasn’t above his assistance, but it was an insult to Meghan?

Couldn't she have asked Harry what an equerry is? although he sounds utterly clueless about the family and the institution he's grown up in.

thebellagio · 12/12/2023 12:43

That’s a bit pathetic to release their video less than 24hrs after W&K release theirs, it doesn’t exactly disprove the arguement of “everything Kate can do, we can do better”.

the optics don’t look good for their charity work, it looks one up man ship

Chouxpastryishard · 12/12/2023 12:47

HonoriaLucastaDelagardie · 12/12/2023 11:56

Their complete disregard for the financial support Charles has given them is awful.

Charles hosted and paid for their wedding reception. In FF, they said it had gone way over budget. So there were a couple of adults in their thirties openly stating that they couldn't, or chose not to, stick to a budget, and didn't seem to appreciate how juvenile and ungrateful it made them look.

Why couldn’t they have paid for it themselves anyway? Harry is loaded and she presumably had money from her time in Suits.

Raincloudsonasunnyday · 12/12/2023 12:53

There’s an awful lot of Meghan Markle featured face-on, center-screen in that video, looking benevolent and saintly (some might say Diana-like). Harry marginal, everyone else definitely supporting actors. <shudder>. It’s like the charitable works (such as they are) are there to lift her/them, rather than the other way round.

And, did they really include Uvalde??! Holy mackerel. She’s got skin as thick as a rhino!

Mylovelygreendress · 12/12/2023 12:55

HonoriaLucastaDelagardie · 12/12/2023 11:56

Their complete disregard for the financial support Charles has given them is awful.

Charles hosted and paid for their wedding reception. In FF, they said it had gone way over budget. So there were a couple of adults in their thirties openly stating that they couldn't, or chose not to, stick to a budget, and didn't seem to appreciate how juvenile and ungrateful it made them look.

They actually wanted their wedding in Westminster Abbey. Or St Paul’s . But were told no . And they wanted to live in Windsor Castle . No.
And Harry wanted William to split the Duchy income with him . Again , no .
Clearly all these knockbacks have festered within him .

cheezncrackers · 12/12/2023 13:00

Interesting contrast between the exceptionally slick and über-flattering shots included in M&H's no-doubt very expensively produced video, vs. the natural and unpretentious one of Kate, George, Charlotte and Louis all mucking in together.

Mylovelygreendress · 12/12/2023 13:01

Raincloudsonasunnyday · 12/12/2023 12:53

There’s an awful lot of Meghan Markle featured face-on, center-screen in that video, looking benevolent and saintly (some might say Diana-like). Harry marginal, everyone else definitely supporting actors. <shudder>. It’s like the charitable works (such as they are) are there to lift her/them, rather than the other way round.

And, did they really include Uvalde??! Holy mackerel. She’s got skin as thick as a rhino!

I posted this photograph at the time and was shouted down but here is Meghan checking in with the photographer to get best photos . So much for private visit

Omid Scobie Endgame PART 5
rosyglowcondition · 12/12/2023 13:06

@Mylovelygreendress You couldn't make it up. And the constant pathetic attempts to overshadow the royal family's events is now so boring and predictable.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/12/2023 13:06

I agree with you @AliceOlive . OS has shown some utterly disgusting racism in his writing about this gentleman. This is a man who would have been working his way up the ranks and into the most trusted position beside the Queen for a long time before anyone gave a damn about who MM was. He was by the Queen's side because he was good at his job and she trusted him. Scobie has to attack him, because his existence belies Scobie's claims about the RF being inherently racist. There's some implication that the Palace just wheeled out the black man when the black woman arrived. As if they'd spent 20 years preparing on the off chance for the arrival of a black fiancé If MM simply did not want an equerry, well more fool her, but that's her (stupid) decision. If she didn't want him because he happens to be black, then she's also a complete racist.

OP posts:
Cosywintertime · 12/12/2023 13:07

Raincloudsonasunnyday · 12/12/2023 12:53

There’s an awful lot of Meghan Markle featured face-on, center-screen in that video, looking benevolent and saintly (some might say Diana-like). Harry marginal, everyone else definitely supporting actors. <shudder>. It’s like the charitable works (such as they are) are there to lift her/them, rather than the other way round.

And, did they really include Uvalde??! Holy mackerel. She’s got skin as thick as a rhino!

I think they are still competing, it’s really distasteful. And odd, as now it’s all in their own heads. No one is competing with them.

Raincloudsonasunnyday · 12/12/2023 13:08

Those photos are why I’m surprised she included Uvalde (it is “she”, as he had nothing to do with it from the public’s pov). She got a massive pasting in the US when those shots circulated. Matthew McConnaughy is from Uvalde, went to school there. He was very judicious in his commentary of her when he visited some days after her. Gotta make sure she looks humble in this unobscured shots!

Just who is helping who in that scenario? To me, it looks like murdered children being used by Meghan Markle for personal publicity.

Cottonsockkitty · 12/12/2023 13:13

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

ThePoshUns · 12/12/2023 13:22

The Wales family - highlights the good work of the baby bank.
The Sussexes - highlights, erm Meghan.

Narcassim in action.

Cosywintertime · 12/12/2023 13:25

ThePoshUns · 12/12/2023 13:22

The Wales family - highlights the good work of the baby bank.
The Sussexes - highlights, erm Meghan.

Narcassim in action.

I agree, when the wales do something they highlight the cause, this video though highlights no cause, they are simply highlighting themselves. I’m not sure they understand the difference though,

rosyglowcondition · 12/12/2023 13:27

ThePoshUns · 12/12/2023 13:22

The Wales family - highlights the good work of the baby bank.
The Sussexes - highlights, erm Meghan.

Narcassim in action.

Spot on

garlicandsapphires · 12/12/2023 13:30

ThePoshUns · 12/12/2023 13:22

The Wales family - highlights the good work of the baby bank.
The Sussexes - highlights, erm Meghan.

Narcassim in action.

The Sussex video was a whole load of nothing.
I was no clearer on what they've been doing or the focus of their work after watching it. Visual word salad.

Cottonsockkitty · 12/12/2023 13:31

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

BoreOfWhabylon · 12/12/2023 13:42

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 12/12/2023 13:06

I agree with you @AliceOlive . OS has shown some utterly disgusting racism in his writing about this gentleman. This is a man who would have been working his way up the ranks and into the most trusted position beside the Queen for a long time before anyone gave a damn about who MM was. He was by the Queen's side because he was good at his job and she trusted him. Scobie has to attack him, because his existence belies Scobie's claims about the RF being inherently racist. There's some implication that the Palace just wheeled out the black man when the black woman arrived. As if they'd spent 20 years preparing on the off chance for the arrival of a black fiancé If MM simply did not want an equerry, well more fool her, but that's her (stupid) decision. If she didn't want him because he happens to be black, then she's also a complete racist.

By any measure, Lt Col Twumasi-Ankrah appears to be a most impressive man. Meghan could have learned a lot from him, I think
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nana_Kofi_Twumasi-Ankrah

Nana Kofi Twumasi-Ankrah - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nana_Kofi_Twumasi-Ankrah

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.