Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
The royal family
Thread gallery
8
Roussette · 10/12/2023 12:44

Of course we know more about their finances than yours. Obviously not intimate details but there's enough published to know that they are spending a fortune

Maybe they have a fortune. It's all guesswork. It sounds like you want them to be bankrupt

LimeCheesecake · 10/12/2023 12:48

He got another 20million for spare. They got several million from Netflix, he inherited £20+ million. So $10mlion house seems affordable.

jf they were running out of money they’d be doing more paid for work. And that’s the problem for the royal family.

cristokitty · 10/12/2023 12:54

I don't want them to be bankrupt. That would be spiteful. I'm just saying, I don't think either of them have the financial acumen to last the rest of their lives without trading in on the family. I don't think they it to last much longer than they have. They've already criticised the family in interviews and books, there's not much left to say/sell and they're not interesting people without the link to his family.

cristokitty · 10/12/2023 12:55

*they have it

Puzzledandpissedoff · 10/12/2023 13:00

On the subject of money, how can we know that Charles isn't still providing funds, private money or otherwise?

It's true Harry claimed to have been cut off, but he's claimed a lot of things, not all of them true. Add that to Charles's known lack of judgement, and it's not something I'd want to assume either way

Roussette · 10/12/2023 13:05

I think the last few posts sum it up. We don't know.

andIsaid · 10/12/2023 13:37

WinnieTheW0rm · 10/12/2023 09:20

Removal isn't the only option.

They could continue with no titles for the DC (as they did at birth, refraining to use the ones that they were entitled to) and could also opt not to use them for themselves (like Mrs Kent, the primary school teacher)

Show quote history

But why would they do that?

He had an argument with his family.

He wrote a book about what was going on and wht impact it had on him.

But - he is a Monarchist and a Royalist.

He said that clearly.

There is no valid reason for him to stop using his title.

andIsaid · 10/12/2023 13:40

WinnieTheW0rm · 10/12/2023 09:26

That doesn't however cover the option of just not using them

Why should he not?

He is a monachist.

He does not particularly like his family of birth but he believes in the institution.

andIsaid · 10/12/2023 13:45

Rockybooboo · 10/12/2023 09:58

That's true. She's certainly kept quiet about her former husband's friendships with arms dealers and sex traffickers. Yes people who keep their mouths shut about Royal corruption. so that we can all live in the fantasy world that the Royal Family are actually decent.

Edited
Show quote history

Well she a relationship with Epstein too.

He gave her quite a lot of money.

Rockybooboo · 10/12/2023 13:57

andIsaid · 10/12/2023 13:45

Well she a relationship with Epstein too.

He gave her quite a lot of money.

Show quote history

Well yes I agree but apparently we shou ld see her as harmless

New posts on this thread. Refresh page