Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Megan dubbed "fucking grifters" Part Deux

1000 replies

Qbish · 27/06/2023 12:06

Harry and Meghan slammed by Spotify executive after podcast deal ends | The Independent

The old thread got closed, just as I was trying to quote tweet someone! So I've started this one, because this shitshow is still rumbling on

Spotify executive hits out at Harry and Meghan after podcast deal ends

Sussexes inked three-year $25m deal with audio company but produced just one series of content

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/harry-meghan-spotify-deal-grifters-b2360608.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
ArcaneWireless · 29/06/2023 20:42

I don’t expect OS’s new book to be about H&M.

I expect it to be about the RF and how they navigated matters after the death of the late Queen. Or will he be suggesting the monarchy was on a very shoogly peg before she died?

H&M left. Their ship has sailed.

Not quite sure why he put the coupons of H&M on his front cover though. They were long gone from the institution.

Unless he wants them doing a Royal Hokey Cokey for ever more?

Maireas · 29/06/2023 20:48

Maybe there will be chapters on how dreadful the Platinum Jubilee and HMQ's funeral were for them. Plus how Harry struggled at the Coronation. They never even let him carry a sword. Heartless.

ArcaneWireless · 29/06/2023 20:51

To be fair Maireas anyone else sporting a sword would have had to out-carry Penny M.

Maireas · 29/06/2023 20:52

Impossible. However, who could not look upon her with wonder and joy and say "it's not fair! I want a sword!"?

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:01

skullbabe · 29/06/2023 20:29

There can't be anything left to share about Harry surely.

Precisely - the book is about the Monarchy post the death of Elizabeth and how it navigates a different era. But again because Scobie is writing it people can’t contemplate that this book isn’t about H&M. Many people forget that Omid was a co-author on Finding Freedom and it’s really interesting how his co author (Carolyn Durand) never gets a mention.

We're not stupid, we know the book isn't going to be about H&M. But there will be an agenda, and there will be details that only insiders could know.

As for his co-writer, she doesn't plaster herself across the media so she isn't mentioned as much. And, of course, it is Omid who Meghan had to admit she supplied information to, via a courtier.

OP posts:
skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:03

How does Scobie plaster himself across the media?

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:06

skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:03

How does Scobie plaster himself across the media?

Ha ha ha, really? I'll post a few examples, shall I?!

We chat to Prince Harry and Meghan’s biographer, Omid Scobie | This Morning (itv.com)

OP posts:
OP posts:
OP posts:
Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:19

Here he is on YouTube. I could go on with this, but this is just a small sample of him plastering himself all over the media. You get the drift.

Omid Scobie: The Truth about Prince Harry and Meghan // E82

Everyone has an opinion on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle however how much of it is based on the media and much is based on the truth?In this episode, I'm jo...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Pz3IJEjRNA

OP posts:
ArcaneWireless · 29/06/2023 21:21

I wonder why he was ‘really shocked’ to hear from sources (hours after the event) that no one had been in touch after the near catastrophic paparazzi chase?

No surprises there when you would think he’d already heard it from the stallion’s mouth…

Howsimplywonderful · 29/06/2023 21:28

@ArcaneWireless

Hopefully he can clear that up for us, it is curious.

Iwantcakeeveryday · 29/06/2023 21:34

@Qbish that's his job! @skullbabe was making the point regarding the book FF and the other author not being referred to or scrutinised about her relationship with them in the same way as he is with regards to it.

skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:37

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:06

How is this different to Valentine Low or Camilla Tominey - both journalists in print and are frequently in interviews, panels and even have shows themselves? All of them are active on social media too. He does no more no less than them.

Milcar · 29/06/2023 21:39

Iwantcakeeveryday · 29/06/2023 21:34

@Qbish that's his job! @skullbabe was making the point regarding the book FF and the other author not being referred to or scrutinised about her relationship with them in the same way as he is with regards to it.

The other author doesn't seem to see it as her job to keep such a high public profile, so maybe that is why she doesn't get mentioned as often?

Gracewithoutend · 29/06/2023 21:39

If the chase was so shocking, why didn't Harry warn his father and his brother beforehand that the story was coming out and he was fine. That's the normal course of these events, isn't it? After all, Harry was in total control of the narrative and we only new about "the chase" because Harry did a press release. Otherwise the whole world was oblivious it had ever happened.
How does Scobie know he didn't forewarn his dad? Only one person could have provided that information.

skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:40

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:13

On American TV

(2) Watch | Facebook

But he’s a journalist and a royal correspondent for ABC - he was there as part of his job. It’s even there in the ticker tape at the bottom. Are royal correspondents not allowed to be on camera?

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:41

Oh, and as a PP was not realising how old he is - this is what he used to look like, when he worked at Heat magazine

Harry and Megan dubbed "fucking grifters" Part Deux
OP posts:
Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:42

skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:40

But he’s a journalist and a royal correspondent for ABC - he was there as part of his job. It’s even there in the ticker tape at the bottom. Are royal correspondents not allowed to be on camera?

You said how has Scobie plastered himself all over the media. I showed you. There's loads more, those are just some representative links from this year.

OP posts:
Milcar · 29/06/2023 21:42

skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:40

But he’s a journalist and a royal correspondent for ABC - he was there as part of his job. It’s even there in the ticker tape at the bottom. Are royal correspondents not allowed to be on camera?

Of course. But the other author isn't a royal correspondent for ABC, and doesn't appear so often in interviews, so isn't mentioned as often. Surely?

Gracewithoutend · 29/06/2023 21:44

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:41

Oh, and as a PP was not realising how old he is - this is what he used to look like, when he worked at Heat magazine

Great teeth.

Milcar · 29/06/2023 21:44

The question, as I understand it, was why don't posters refer to the co-author as well as Scobie. The answer being that the co-author doesn't put themselves in the media. Scobie does, including through his job as a royal reporter.

Gracewithoutend · 29/06/2023 21:44

Sorry, I mean he's always had great teeth.

Qbish · 29/06/2023 21:46

Milcar · 29/06/2023 21:44

The question, as I understand it, was why don't posters refer to the co-author as well as Scobie. The answer being that the co-author doesn't put themselves in the media. Scobie does, including through his job as a royal reporter.

And that's the odd thing. Prince Harry hates "royal reporters". But Meghan feeds this one, and that's OK 🤔

OP posts:
skullbabe · 29/06/2023 21:51

Gracewithoutend · 29/06/2023 21:39

If the chase was so shocking, why didn't Harry warn his father and his brother beforehand that the story was coming out and he was fine. That's the normal course of these events, isn't it? After all, Harry was in total control of the narrative and we only new about "the chase" because Harry did a press release. Otherwise the whole world was oblivious it had ever happened.
How does Scobie know he didn't forewarn his dad? Only one person could have provided that information.

No.

The Daily Mail and the Daily Express posted pictures taken of them during the paparazzi chase first thing in the morning. H&M released a statement specifically saying that publishing pictures that were taken under those circumstances was in bad form. The focus shifted to the chase but very few people remember that on the back of the statement - those pictures were taken down by print media (Mail/Express). (they are still archived on the Wayback machine).

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread