Harry - what next?

[TrashyPanda]

Continuation thread for all things Harry, Meghan and all things Archewell.

welcome back everyone!

@Iwantcakeeveryday

It’s a very simple mantra to remember

people in glass houses just shouldn’t throw stones

Simple

You should probably take your own advice. @Roussette barely says anything about William and Kates marriage and yet you and others can say whatever you like as much as you like about Meghan and Harry and the moment @Roussette challenges it one of you rolls out the one and only slightly negative comment as if its comparable to the lengthy and constant dissection of H & M;s marriage and life. It isn't. At all. But once again it shows that those who defend H & M against this nasty vitriol are held to a high standard than you hold yourselves and each other.

Also that it’s a public forum which actively invites new membership so “brand new posters” are to be welcomed, I would have thought. We were all one once.

Where is the OP these days? Not coming back to the thread they started? strange.

They won't be 'brand new'.

my point was a brand new poster zeroing in on a long time poster repeatedly is kind of a give away.

Yes, indeed.

I remember when I joined. I got a feel for the place, I watched and saw the way to post, whilst wanting to express my opinion. Yet, these 'brand new' posters often jump in straightaway with attacking.

As for the two marriages, long may they thrive. I am sure they will.

I have to say that there have definitely been posters who were gleeful at the thought of William having an affair etc, but no one was named and no particular poster sprung to mind for me. So I’m not sure why posters feel the need to declare it wasn’t them if it wasn’t. The trouble with doing that is that someone will inevitably find an instance of where a poster has said something questionable. This then leads to a spiral of “he said she said” and the accusations of posters being attacked. I personally wish posters would ignore arguments or accusations they know don’t involve them. Don’t mean to be policing, although I know I sort of am, it just ruins the threads 🤷‍♀️

i thought mn hq had a new way of stopping nc on a thread.

@Iwantcakeeveryday

I have always said that I hoped that Harry and Meghan stay together, that they seemed in love. I have never mentioned their children either.

so don’t make fake accusations that I’ve done anything different

@smilesy

My problem is the when said posters say ‘don’t do that, I wouldn’t/I never …’ - It’s incredibly hard to sit on your hands reading such hypocrisy

I don’t agree with the sentiment that we should hope for marriages to last just for the sake of it. I hope they do whatever makes them happy!

I must spend the rest of the day examining all your posts for the last year or two for any sign of hypocrisy.

OK. You are not giving up. Once, just once, I said that maybe that's why H&W argued.

You then accuse me of gossiping and trashing them. Gossiping and trashing them would be hundreds of posts. Not one.

I made a mistake. I said I never engaged about the affair rumours.

I did ONCE. One post. About 18 months ago. I apologise for misleading you. And making you so angry with me.

Will you now please give up?

I have covered it now.

i also remember the glee when it was claimed that Kate was moving into the new house in Windsors on her own with the kids as K&W had split. I remember which poster was first in with her article (from hello and 10 years out of date)

Horrible gleeful gossiping.

@Roussette

Do you remember those posts too ?

I am talking about your remarks in general about Harry and Meghan, extremely negative, joining in on all the threads with posters gleeful at any sign of bad news of rthem. You do not police those people the way you police @Roussette which you are continuing to do despite demanding she drop it herself.

why are you keeping on? You said to move on but you can't seem to yourself.

I have said everything I want to say.
You obviously are on a mission to discredit and attack me. I am not engaging with you any more.

Please stop @ ing me. I won't reply again.

I suspect reports of Harry receiving £40 million will be wide of the mark .

I agree.

The entire estate was revealed (after royal foot-stamping) to be in the region of £50-£70m and apparently the queen copped the lot.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/may/18/queenmother.monarchy

I can imagine Will amounts may be passed along via a trust with specific purposes such as education or housing.

That way it can’t be used for anything which could be controversial such as commercial enterprises or legal fees

End of the day Meghan deserves 50% of assets for putting up with harry and vice Versa

No one wants them to divorce. I don't think they will as they have a very co dependent relationship. I don't subscribe to the divorce or the affair nonsense. If Harry and Meghan did split I'm sure harry would remain in California and be present in his kids lives and they would co parent successfully. I don't think either want to perpetuate the cycle of divorce and disaffection.
@Howsimplywonderful Magnificent display of restrain

Keeping in mind the Queen Mother had 6 GC, 4 from HMQ and 2 from Margaret.

Then 8 DGGC from HMQ (although Edwards may not have been born before she died), plus 4 I think from Margaret's kids.

I also think it's wild to think Harry would have inherited £40m. Even allowing for investments to accumulate. When her will , will have been spilt between so many people

I thought Meghan's next project was a book about their love story? Nope, I wouldn't believe any divorce stories.

I could imagine that Netflix may do a suits reboot. The cast are probably available, it seems popular with the Netflix audience.

It’s not for me, but lots of people liked it. Meghan can get a producer credit for it too.

Yes, I should think she's got plenty of opportunities. She's used to that kind of self promotion anyway, with her earlier career - acting, ads, promotions, the blog etc.